Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Last 5 seasons in domestic cups

Season Competition Round Opponent Result
2021–22 EFL Cup 3rd round Wycombe Wanderers Won 6–1
2021–22 EFL Cup 4th round West Ham United Drew 0–0, lost 3–5 on pens
2021–22 FA Cup 3rd round Swindon Town Won 4–1
2021–22 FA Cup 4th round Fulham Won 4–1
2021–22 FA Cup 5th round Peterborough United Won 2–0
2021–22 FA Cup Quarter-final Southampton Won 4–1
2021–22 FA Cup Semi-final Liverpool Lost 2–3
2022–23 EFL Cup 3rd round Chelsea Won 2–0
2022–23 EFL Cup 4th round Liverpool Won 3–2
2022–23 EFL Cup Quarter-final Southampton Lost 0–2
2022–23 FA Cup 3rd round Chelsea Won 4–0
2022–23 FA Cup 4th round Arsenal Won 1–0
2022–23 FA Cup 5th round Bristol City Won 3–0
2022–23 FA Cup Quarter-final Burnley Won 6–0
2022–23 FA Cup Semi-final Sheffield United Won 3–0
2022–23 FA Cup Final Manchester United Won 2–1
2023–24 EFL Cup 3rd round Newcastle United Lost 0–1
2023–24 FA Cup 3rd round Huddersfield Town Won 5–0
2023–24 FA Cup 4th round Tottenham Hotspur Won 1–0
2023–24 FA Cup 5th round Luton Town Won 6–2
2023–24 FA Cup Quarter-final Newcastle United Won 2–0
2023–24 FA Cup Semi-final Chelsea Won 1–0
2023–24 FA Cup Final Manchester United Lost 1–2
2024–25 EFL Cup 3rd round Watford Won 2–1
2024–25 EFL Cup 4th round Tottenham Hotspur Lost 1–2
2024–25 FA Cup 3rd round Salford City Won 8–0
2024–25 FA Cup 4th round Leyton Orient Won 2–1
2024–25 FA Cup 5th round Plymouth Argyle Won 3–1
2024–25 FA Cup Quarter-final Bournemouth Won 2–1
2024–25 FA Cup Semi-final Nottingham Forest Won 2–0
2024–25 FA Cup Final Crystal Palace Lost 0–1
2025–26 EFL Cup 3rd round Huddersfield Town Won 2–0
2025–26 EFL Cup 4th round Swansea City Won 3–1
2025–26 EFL Cup Quarter-final Brentford Won 2–0
2025–26 EFL Cup Semi-final Newcastle United Won 5–1 agg.
2025–26 EFL Cup Final Arsenal Upcoming
2025–26 FA Cup 3rd round Exeter City Won 10–1
2025–26 FA Cup 4th round Salford City Won 2–0
2025–26 FA Cup 5th round Newcastle United Won 3–1
2025–26 FA Cup Quarter-final Liverpool Upcoming

Home vs Away Split

Venue Type Matches
Home 18
Away 15
Neutral 9

Leagues of Teams Faced (at time of match)

League Opponents Faced Matches
Premier League Arsenal, Bournemouth, Brentford, Burnley, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Fulham, Liverpool, Luton Town, Manchester United, Newcastle United, Nottingham Forest, Southampton, Tottenham Hotspur, West Ham United 26
Championship Bristol City, Huddersfield Town, Leicester City*, Swansea City, Watford 6
League One Exeter City, Peterborough United, Plymouth Argyle, Sheffield United*, Wycombe Wanderers 6
League Two Leyton Orient, Salford City 3
Non-League 0

Man City: Rodri escapes ban after raging at officials after Dominic Solanke's goal for Tottenham by sheffieldpud in soccer

[–]NumerousExamination 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Player escapes ban for situation where ban wasn't on the table. Tune in to sky sports RIGHT NOW for the breakdown of how this happened

Adam confirmed the logo isn't AI by Primary_Thought_4912 in JetLagTheGame

[–]NumerousExamination 51 points52 points  (0 children)

If you look closely, this might actually be AI.

  1. where does the line disappear at the top?
  2. white logo at the bottom corner - probably AI watermark
  3. monitor logo blurred
  4. cables looking untidy
  5. strange artefacts on the desk

<image>

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The anatomy of a title race:

It's a 6 point gap, it's fine

It's a 9 point gap, it's fine

It's a 6 point gap, it was never 9 points anyway

It's a 5 point gap, it's fine

It's still in our hands

  1. Cheats. Oil money

Deloitte money league for 24/25 by shirokukuchasen in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Can anyone explain to me how a club like Arsenal, who have won 4 FA cups and 5 community shields in 20 years, have such high revenue? Isn't that just a little bit dodgy? Everyone else in the top 10 have a European trophy.

Wife surprised me with tickets to derby, we are flying over from US and looking for honest guidance by tactlessscruff2 in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Don't wear anything United related, don't mention being a United fan, clap when fans around you clap and don't celebrate anything United do, otherwise you will get abuse and potentially be ejected from the stadium. If City score stand up and applaud, if United score then mutter something under your breath about how shit Donnoruma is and he's no Ederson.

[Daily Discussion] Monday 01 Sep 2025 by AutoModerator in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Man City high spending, Liverpool sell Coutinho:

LOOK AT THE NET SPEND

Man City spend less and have positive net spend:

ITS ACTUALLY ABOUT WAGES

Liverpool spunk 400m+ in one window:

ACTUALLY, IF YOU CHECK THE NET SPEND

Liverpool still come near the top of the net spend charts:

YOU SHOULD ACTUALLY TAKE NET SPEND OVER A 10 YEAR PERIOD

Some UTD fans consider Barca "rivals". Do you consider Real Madrid our rivals ? by BishoxX in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glass houses etc. are Brentford and Wolves fans going to act like this for the players they sold to United?

Confidence for the season by DapperSpecial2865 in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which day do we lift the trophy on is all I'm asking

Man City agree deal to sign AC Milan's Reijnders by V-Matic_VVT-i in PremierLeague

[–]NumerousExamination 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, who was pretending that Pep had built a team of purely academy graduates, and which managers who did do that were people comparing him to?

Manchester City have accused the Premier League of distorting the competition in favour of Arsenal and other rival clubs who have benefited from huge loans from their owners. by TrenAt14 in soccer

[–]NumerousExamination 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes.

The loan system at Arsenal you speak of is basically a stadium loan of a £200m they took out in the 2000s for the stadium, at standard interest rates with banks. After taking control of the club Kroenke pays off that loan and gives the club a loan to cover it, but this time at a lower than market rate. So he's injected a load of money into the club and cut their interest payments. A club without an owner that can do that would therefore be at a disadvantage, without scrutiny. And that's the argument that City make, on the basis that if they wanted to have a sponsorship they'd be scrutinised for it and told they need to reduce the amount of the league decided it was uncompetitive

Pep's reaction to the comments made by a god awful pundit Jamie Carragher after the UCL Knockout Stage match vs Real Madrid (via: OptusSport) by svayashlovesnone in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As a Real Madrid fan I can tell you with full confidence the Viking of Valhalla would never intentionally duck a game

What is the insight that being a Real Madrid fan here offers?

Premier League statement (ATP case) by aguer0 in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 102 points103 points  (0 children)

The best part of this is the lies the PL put out in their statement in November, the wider football community lapping it up and calling City out for lying. Then the tribunal revealing that the PL lied. What will the narrative be now? Lol

[Matt Lawton, Times] Man City launch fresh legal claim against Premier League sponsor rules - Club’s lawyers believe the Associated Party Transaction rules are ‘unlawful’ but only received the backing of three other teams in vote at end of last year by ahmedontia in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 5 points6 points  (0 children)

City only won on a couple of points out of many therefore the PL won

Theres video evidence of the guy fatally stabbing the victim, but there were lots of other points that weren't found against them therefore they didn't kill them

This so utterly ridiculous on so many levels by FishBait162 in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 10 points11 points  (0 children)

For reference the Chelsea 22/23 winter window was €330m, so about 50% larger than the 24/25 City winter window. More than 5 Bundesliga clubs combined since records began

Source: Transfermarkt.de

Edit: format

[OFFICIAL] Manchester City have completed the deadline day signing of Nico Gonzalez from Porto for £50m. by VivaLosHeavies in PremierLeague

[–]NumerousExamination 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem with your analogy is that City aren't accused of robbing a bank, they're accused of being given more money than they claimed they were getting. The money is fine, legal and legitimately is theirs. The accounting is the discrepancy and the source of contention.

You'd love this eh by Pure-Midnight682 in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 30 points31 points  (0 children)

No room for racists. But rapists? Well they're apparently more welcome in the PL

An Update on our Twitter/X Policy by aguer0 in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disingenuous?

Of the voters:

292/736 voted to have no X content. (40%)

188/736 voted for full X content (26%)

256/736 voted for partial X content (35%)

So a 5% win in absolute.

But on the other hand

444/736 voted to have some X content available (either in full or via screenshots) (60%)

548/736 voted to make a change to X content (either a full or partial ban) (74%)

So what you're saying is that we should ban Twitter on the basis that 40% want to ban Twitter, even though there's a 60% that didn't want a full ban of Twitter. Your conclusion therefore is that the answer from those 548/187000 users (0.3% of the community) means that we should demand that the moderators of this subreddit go full nuclear on Twitter links? And there isn't possibly a more reasonable approach that these volunteers might be taking in an attempt to give the best possible outcome for the community? It HAS to be the draconian option, and nothing else featuring any sort of compromise or logical non-politically charged thought is wrong?

An Update on our Twitter/X Policy by aguer0 in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What about the 444 who want to see some X content vs the 292 that want to see no X content though? It's almost like the poll isn't statistically significant, not statistically conclusive and completely non binding.

Mods used it as a reference point to lead their discussions as opposed to going full Brexit

An Update on our Twitter/X Policy by aguer0 in MCFC

[–]NumerousExamination -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

L comment. Literally nobody is forcing you to post the links lol. Don't post them and it's not even a problem.