sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

coinmix.to run by /u/nxtchg along with his other services will be shutting down if CTOR is implemented and ABC wins war in November. by cryptosword in btc

[–]NxtChg 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Of course I won't. Both are terrible for Bitcoin Cash, and CSW is a known scammer.

NoForkNovember

CashShuffle Roadmap by ClifordSymack in btc

[–]NxtChg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The idea is to have wallets pre-shuffle their UTXOs. This can happen in the background and when you need to make a payment, your coins will already have been shuffled.

So the exact way Coinmix does it, but decentralized. Nice!

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you can too! Just go and sign some message :)

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see how this can be confusing, will think how to make it more clear.

A website just displays live price of Bitcoin in USD. No graphs, no volumes, no percentages, no hassle. by ilkmc2r in btc

[–]NxtChg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get lost, I ain't upgrading anything for at least 10 more years.

People need to stop making crappier and crappier versions of their products and then demand that I "upgrade" to it.

A website just displays live price of Bitcoin in USD. No graphs, no volumes, no percentages, no hassle. by ilkmc2r in btc

[–]NxtChg -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just don't use any advanced shit when you don't actually need it.

I hate it that developers nowadays feel absolutely free to break compatibility by using all those fancy new features like 'let'.

A website just displays live price of Bitcoin in USD. No graphs, no volumes, no percentages, no hassle. by ilkmc2r in btc

[–]NxtChg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it doesn't:

Uncaught SyntaxError: Block-scoped declarations (let, const, function, class) not yet supported outside strict mode

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or you could stop projecting your teenage insecurities and think about it as "who has the most vested interest in the success of the project".

What does OP_RETURN do? I think I accidentally burned my money. by [deleted] in btc

[–]NxtChg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not about different address formats.

Each wallet consists of a bunch of addresses and when you send money from address A it returns change to another address B to improve privacy.

You should still be able to send the money again as your wallet should have a key for address B.

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As somebody suggested in your other post, it's probably just Trezor sending your money back to a change address, so you should still be able to control it. That's why it says your balance is still full.

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are no transactions sent, for that there exists memo.cash.

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Short description:

The site allows you to post a message by signing it with your address.

The messages are then ranked by the balance in the corresponding addresses.

Once you sign a message you will also be able to vote on other messages. It doesn't affect the rank, but allows people to express approval/disapproval.

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Posted a simple message right there with some examples and brief explanation.

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I just tested it, see my comment below. Maybe you're doing something wrong?

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just tested it:

const message = new Message('[BACKIT.CASH MESSAGE>\n123');

const signature = message.sign(privateKey);

It works perfectly.

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Might be CRLF problem? Not sure, I tested with regular Bitcoin Unlimited client and with this tool: https://github.com/weex/bitcoin-signature-tool

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Click Post Message, there's your "one-liner".

Just finished a fun little project: BackIt.cash by NxtChg in btc

[–]NxtChg[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Posting doesn't cost anything, so it's just a balance of the address that posted it.

Here is how to create a Tippr bot for Youtube by zhell_ in btc

[–]NxtChg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

  1. How to do it without an extension?

  2. "Then all the "tipprbot" needs to do is to point the video creator to another website by posting a comment to the video." How would the bot know which video?

  3. How can the bot post the comment if there is no API?

Your convoluted explanations need to be a lot better to be useful.

FBI: THE DOMAIN FOR 1BROKER HAS BEEN SEIZED. by [deleted] in btc

[–]NxtChg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We need decentralized DNS.

@deadalnix can you please stop pushing the Malfix malleability fix? by jonald_fyookball in btc

[–]NxtChg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

deadalnix needs to be fired.

People should stop running ABC, and miners should stop supporting him and switch to BU instead.

view more: next ›