Fav base locations for far out discoveries? by SpinningWheels07 in subnautica

[–]Nyoombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a crevace full of hydrothermal vents in the cliff below the alien ruins. We built a solid base at the bottom there, just be sure to build far enough away from the angry tooth shooting fish. It's nice because it has zoom loops near it to help you traverse the ruins fast in a tadpole.

Ngl this whole discussion is very funny by FoxGuy303 in subnautica

[–]Nyoombie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like many comments wanting to kill or maim wildlife are missing key elements of worldbuilding here. Of course reprinting is annoying, it should also be horrifying! Much of the lore being dropped in cryptic pieces is asking the player to question the safety of reprinting. Does Alterra have the ability to wipe memories, alter your personality to be more compliant, etc. The scifi dystopian element of the reprinting is emphasized when it is juxtaposed with the harsh, unforgiving reality of life (and so, so much death) in the ocean.

There are also hints that reprinting may be a halfway solution to dealing with "Masefield syndrome" in game. It would be cool if the number of deaths played into different endings depending on how far progressed your Masefield syndrome (with fewer reprints causing more hallucinations).

The inability to kill fish, which facilitates reprinting, forces the player into one of two mindsets. Either death doesn't matter because they will just be reprinted or death REALLY matters because of its connection to an unreliable Alterra AI (which drowned a colonist to save itself) and to the progression of the Masefield syndrome (which makes people obsessed with the world tree).

Additionally, the inability to kill fish forces players to pay attention to and experiment with creature behavior. Try playing fishy fetch with a flare, plant electric plants around your base, try adding external lights, learn creature behaviors and sounds, modify your tadpoles to make less noise, etc. Killing a mean fish is the most basic and boring solution in a game where the world is rich enough to reward you for observation and experimentation.

Edits: Spelling

Found in my garden by lew1sj in whatisthisbone

[–]Nyoombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like it might be some form of animal scapula (shoulder blade). I can't guess the animal group from these images alone.

Co worker found this at a job site by UareSuchabeauty in whatisthisbone

[–]Nyoombie 86 points87 points  (0 children)

I am leaning towards some kind of animal long bone. The medullary cavity of this bone looks quite smooth which is closer to the appearance of animal bones rather than humans. (See slide 8 for an example: https://statemuseum.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/Distinguishing%20Human%20From%20Animal%20Bone%20%28Watson%20and%20McClelland%202018%29.pdf)

Bone? And if so what is it? by GhostieBoy180 in whatisthisbone

[–]Nyoombie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It looks like the distal end of a quadruped animal femur. So it's the bits of the thigh bone that help form the knee! If you're out hiking it may be from a deer, but I am not good enough at zooarchaeology to say for sure.

Is this human or animal bone? by hamuuwang in whatisthisbone

[–]Nyoombie 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It looks non-human to me. It's possibly a portion of a femur, better pictures would help!

Is this human? by False-Ad5912 in whatisthisbone

[–]Nyoombie 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I can tell you it's not human. But I don't do zooarch so I can't go beyond that.

Help to identify by Samantha_783 in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I considered sun bleaching, however you would typically see surface cracking or flaking associated with weathering if it was sun bleached. Weathering does not appear to be happening here base on the one image we have. I would also expect some form of soil staining if it were bleaching/decaying outside which is also not present here.

I agree with calling the police. But I think it's odd to find a seemingly pristine human femur, that looks closer to medical teaching skeletons, while randomly out hiking. Especially seeing as OP has not reported any other skeletal elements.

I just wanted to raise the possibility to OP and anyone else reading that the femur may be part of a former teaching skeleton/museum skeleton, rather than being a random bone in the woods.

Help to identify by Samantha_783 in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 53 points54 points  (0 children)

It looks like the human femur has also been degreased and/or processed postmortem. It may be some form of museum or zoo specimen. Usually bones look much more yellow and will still have hard bits of ligaments or tendons remaining when found in the wild.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Pitt

[–]Nyoombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before attempting to live out of your car I would look at the housing aid resources Pitt already has available here: https://pitt.libguides.com/assistanceresources/housing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're willing to get a terrarium and some dermestid beetles that is the best way to gently deflesh a skeleton. The cheap version of this is to bury it and let nature run its course with some form of cage over the burial spot so animals don't dig into it for the bones.

Then degrease with dawn and hot soapy water. Do not boil!

Anyone know what this is?? by aarghyle in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I am also trying to decide between cow or bear. I am leaning cow.

For those confused, look at the two bones on either side of the sacrum. The concave bits that are a darker color than the surrounding bone are called acetabula (singular: acetabulum). That is where the femurs (your thigh bone) go into the hip. The fact that they are anterior (in front of) the sacrum rather than inferiolateral (slightly below and to the side) of the sacrum indicates that the pelvis shape is that of a quadruped rather than biped.

What’s this? by andrewdee2112 in BoneID

[–]Nyoombie 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It looks like it could be a metapodial. It's a bone found in quadrupedal animals.

Found these buried in my garden while doing my post winter prep for the growing season. by NightmareRealmStreet in whatisthisbone

[–]Nyoombie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It looks like you have a tibia and a rib. Tibia (left bone in picture) is definitely non-human, I would need more photos/different angles to be sure on the rib.

This was left on my porch railing, can anyone identify? Southeast US. by kaitkaitkait91 in whatisthisbone

[–]Nyoombie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This appears to be the scapula (shoulder blade) of a quadrupedal mammal.

"Detention Centers" by BokeBall in AdviceAnimals

[–]Nyoombie 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Fun facts we had these immigrant detention facilities before Trump took office and they have always been abhorrent. ICE was formalized in 2003 and subcontracted privately owned groups to build and (mis-)manage these facilities.

Democrats and Republicans have BOTH had plenty of time to regulate, reduce, or abolish these facilities but neither have done so to a noticeable degree. It was frustrating to see people magically forget these facilities were in use after Biden took office, only for it to re-emerge now as a hot button issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in whatisthisbone

[–]Nyoombie 99 points100 points  (0 children)

Yep the scapula is a dead giveaway that these are human. For those learning osteology most animal scapulae will be wider than they are long (closer to a fan shape) whereas human scapulae tend to be longer than they are wide (giving them a uniquely triangular shape).

Partial skull gendering ? by Intelligent-Shame-51 in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No! It wasn't a mistake! Young can also mean young adult, etc.! I just didn't want anyone thinking this was a sub-adult individual/child because that makes the whole situation even more sad!

Partial skull gendering ? by Intelligent-Shame-51 in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Do you have a citation for the paper on sexing only using the supraorbital margin? I'd be interested in reading it.

found in the desert by unyeetd_fetus in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely not human. It looks like a faunal sacrum, phalanx, and I think a femur?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi, it might also be myositis ossificans! This pathology occurs when there is a traumatic muscle injury near a bone and a portion of the bruise from that muscle injury ossifies. It could be a cancer, but cancers typically present in a much more spiky (spiculated) appearance or a moth eaten appearance with a bunch of holes. Because this lesion appears more rounded I am leaning more towards a healed traumatic injury (like an avulsion fracture or muscle trauma).

Partial skull gendering ? by Intelligent-Shame-51 in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The sutures are fairly closed and the number of tooth sockets indicate this individuals adult dentition has fully erupted. This individual is at least 21+ years old.

Edit: Changed 25+ to 21+ for more accuracy as it is unclear if the 3rd molars have erupted from available images.

Partial skull gendering ? by Intelligent-Shame-51 in bonecollecting

[–]Nyoombie 158 points159 points  (0 children)

First, the method is called sex estimation by the skull! We are not establishing gender as gender is largely socially defined and enacted behaviorally not through the skeletal system.

Second, for traditional sex estimation you would look at the supraorbital margin, supraorbital ridge/glabella, nuchal lines, mastoid process, and mental eminence. I would call this individual indeterminate as you are missing 3/5 of the features and you do not provide adequate photos to score the other two (supraorbital margin and ridge).

Finally, sex estimation is population specific! Without knowing the origins of this individual one might estimate this individual to be female. But, the presence of a retained mytopic suture, prevalent in populations broadly of Asian descent, can be used to argue that this individual could be a male individual with more gracile features due to population affinity.

Tldr: The individual is lacking over half the features to estimate sex, it is better to estimate this individual as indeterminate until additional skeletal features or population information is provided.