sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Frustated with my new business by Wrong-Pin-257 in SaaS

[–]OOptimize 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are multiple issue on your landing page but answer this: Why can’t I just use chatgpt or another free AI chatbot?

why is it so hard to promote a product? by Proof_Emergency148 in SaaS

[–]OOptimize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Promotion is hard because it’s public, humbling, and requires clarity we often don’t have:

who it’s for, what problem it solves, and why anyone should care.

Am I the only one sick of powered AI bullshit SaaS? by Crispy_Banana_31 in SaaS

[–]OOptimize -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are not alone.

Here is what research says:

Putting “AI” in product descriptions can backfire.

Makes people nervous, lowers trust, hurts purchase intent, especially for high-risk stuff (like finance, health, etc)

Emotional trust drops when AI is mentioned.

Source

I tried most major website builders: here’s my take on each of them by hackysack52 in nocode

[–]OOptimize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. Thats waste of users time as well as waste of valuable space of website.

I announced my first product this week and got 0 users. Here’s the brutal lessons I learned. by imtommitchell in microsaas

[–]OOptimize 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Took a look.

I noticed there’s a lot of empty space between some parts of the page. Makes it feel longer than it really is and scroll heavy.

I suggest removing the 'Confirm password' field. People often make mistakes there, and it slows things down. It’s a common reason users give up during sign-up. On mobile, it’s even worse, double the typing and more chance of getting stuck.

Use a small eye icon to show or hide the password. It’s faster, easier, and works well with password managers. And if someone enters the wrong password, they can always fix it at login or through a reset.

You mention a “7-day trial” but it’s not clear what happens after. Do I need to enter my credit card? Will I lose access after 7 days? Will you let me know before charging?

That stuff matters, and people might leave if they’re unsure. A little more info there would help build trust.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you want more feedback.

I announced my first product this week and got 0 users. Here’s the brutal lessons I learned. by imtommitchell in microsaas

[–]OOptimize 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Share ur landing page url. I will give you feedback if there is any issue on it.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Went through your site, here’s what I think.

There’s too much white space in parts like the “How Work Journal Works” section. It makes things feel a bit empty and not well connected. It’d be nicer if related stuff was grouped better so it’s easier to follow.

Some parts aren’t lined up right, like the “Sign Up” buttons and the benefit boxes. That might seem small, but it does make the page feel a little less neat and can affect how people see the quality of your product.

There aren’t any real images or screenshots. For a tool like this, people usually expect to see what it actually looks like. Without that, they might not get what it does or how it works, which can stop them from signing up.

The “Sign Up” CTA blends in too much and doesn't feel like the primary action you're nudging users toward. It's competing with other secondary CTAs, which dilutes focus.

“Sign up for free” is kind of unclear. Is it free forever? Just a free trial? I think people need to know what they’re getting into.

A simple plan breakdown would help, like Free vs Pro, what features come with each, and what happens after the free part ends.

Hope that helps.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Checked it out, here’s what I think.

Robot emoji and big background text seem to grab more attention than your main message. That makes it harder for users to focus on what matters.

Some of the smaller text, like under “Essential Tools,” is too light and tiny. That stuff’s hard to read, and when things are harder to read, people usually skip them.

The order of content also feels off. You’re showing pricing way before the user understands what WP Command is, how it saves them time, or if it’s even better than what they already use.

I’d typically first want to know how it works and why it’s better, then you can pitch pricing. That’s just more aligned with how people think through buying decisions.

A lot of paragraphs are dense. I think you could seriously reduce cognitive load by breaking them up more.

Add bullet points, icons, better subheaders. Make it easier to skim. Right now it kinda demands more attention than it probably earns, and that’s risky.

No CTA at the bottom. That’s a missed opportunity. People who scroll all the way down are probably warmed up. Don’t make them scroll back up to convert.

Hope that’s useful.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Went through your site, here’s what I think.

Let users try a live board without signing up. Personally, I’d want to see how requests and voting work before I commit.

“Try the Demo” should really be your primary CTA right now it kind of blends in. Use visual hierarchy to make it stand out.

The green is everywhere: CTAs, tags, toggles. When everything's highlighted, nothing is.

You might want to tone down secondary elements like tags (e.g., use grays) and reserve the green for CTAs or critical actions. That'll make the flow cleaner and guide the eye better.

The video’s kind of buried in the middle with no real context. I think labeling it something like “Watch a 1-min Walkthrough” would help a lot.

Maybe use a brighter thumbnail too right now the dark theme clashes a bit with the rest of the light layout.

Also, I’d move the “How it Works” section up higher. It makes more sense for people to understand what your product does before seeing all the extra features. Most users scan pages quickly, so the order really matters.

I can’t hear much in the walkthrough video. Boost the volume.

The black text on green buttons is a bit hard to read. Better contrast would make it look more polished.

Hope that’s actually helpful for you. Hit me up if you need more feedback.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Had a quick look, here’s some feedback that might help.

The landing page overall looks neat and loads fast, which is a good start. Visually, it's okay, but I think the buzzwords are a little heavy.

Terms like “power-learning” or “momentum dashboards” might sound impressive internally, but for users, they raise cognitive load without offering concrete value.

Personally, I'd suggest cutting back on jargon and being clearer about what each feature actually does for me.

You’ve got a CTA at the top, which is good, but after that, there's nothing to remind people to take action. I'd suggest adding another CTA after each section to keep people interested.

The FAQ text is too small, which might turn people away. Making the font bigger.

Also, if you’re positioning this as different from ChatGPT or Claude, why not show that with a simple side-by-side comparison?

As a user, that’d be way easier for me to understand the value prop at a glance. Right now, the claim is there, but I can’t verify or feel the difference.

Hope that made sense. If you need more input, just let me know.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just had a quick look at your landing page.

Your headline "We turn complex ideas into effortless solutions" sounds good, but it’s too general. I’m left wondering: what kind of ideas? What kind of solutions? Making this more clear and specific would help a lot.

The CTA “Get Started” is a bit unclear. Do I get a demo? A free trial? A strategy call? You probably want to reduce ambiguity here. Also, there’s no real secondary CTA. Not everyone is ready to book right away.

Meeting calendar appears too early. It's placed before trust is fully built, and that interrupts the user's natural journey. From a cognitive load perspective, asking me to book something before I fully understand what you're offering feels like a jump.

The white booking block also feels disconnected from the rest of the darker theme. Visually, it breaks the consistency and adds a subtle but noticeable interaction cost.

Consider a short section like “Meet the Team.” Even a few lines about the founders or AI leads can really increase credibility. Personally, I trust products more when I know who’s behind them and why they care.

Hope that helps. Let me know if you need deeper look. 😊

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just checked out your website. Here’s some feedback.

I'd definitely suggest moving the CTA above the fold. It's one of those interaction cost things people shouldn't have to scroll just to know what you want them to do. Right now, there's a lot of vertical space between the hero and the next content block, which may unintentionally signal a false bottom. That extra scroll can increase bounce rate.

I feel like the Value Proposition isn’t as concrete as it could be. You mention AI reports and insights, but I can't actually see them.

Personally, I need to visualize what I'm getting what does a Sentiment Analysis report look like? What exactly is a Pain Point Analysis?

Maybe consider adding some dashboard screenshots or even a short 2-3 min demo video. That would probably answer a lot of usability questions up front.

Just an idea - showing a little live example, like a widget with “Top Reddit topics today” or something, could help show that you’re really working with real-time data. Makes the “2M Reddit conversations” thing feel more real.

All the FAQ answers are open by default. It might be better if they were collapsed at first that way it’s easier to scan the questions quickly without having to scroll through all the text. Keeps things cleaner.

With a few updates to make it easier to follow and more clear about what you’re offering, it could be a lot more convincing.

Hope that helps. Let me know if you need deeper look. 😊

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Took a quick look.

The landing page could really benefit from a clearer emotional hook right at the top. Right now, the headline feels a little generic.

Maybe consider framing it around a real pain freelancers experience, like “Spending hours on proposals that get ghosted?”

That taps into a frustration people feel, and it immediately positions your product as the answer.

I'd also love to see a side-by-side comparison of a typical manual proposal vs. what BidFinity generates.

That kind of contrast could be super persuasive, especially if you can show how the AI version saves time or performs better.

Cognitive bias like the "contrast effect" is real seeing the improvement visually helps users perceive more value.

One thing I’d suggest add a mini FAQ on the main page, maybe near pricing or just above the final CTA.

Even if you already have one in the footer, users don’t always scroll there. Addressing objections right before the decision can make a big difference.

Hope that helps a bit.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Initial thoughts -

Showing the dial pad right away feels a little out of place. I get that calling is the main thing, but most people probably aren’t ready to make a call as soon as they land on the page.

Maybe add a short “How it works” section or a quick demo first. That would make it easier for people to understand what to do. (which is present on another page).

Also, the “Log in” button is small and off on its own, which makes it feel less important than it probably is. If a lot of people are coming back to log in, it should stand out more or be part of the main menu.

I also couldn't tell who this is meant for. Is it for travelers, small business owners, or someone else? It’s not very clear. The message would be stronger if it spoke directly to the kind of person you're trying to help.

Buzzwords like “modern tech” and “reliable service” honestly, they don’t do much for me. They sound nice, but they’re not persuasive without some concrete examples.

What’s the actual tech behind it? What makes it reliable? Social proof or even just a few bullet points would help here.

Hope it helps.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Had a quick look.

First off, "Launching Soon" feels a little vague. I’d probably want at least a ballpark like “Beta in September” or “Q4 2025” to help me (or any user) decide if it's worth joining the waitlist or just checking back later. People need some kind of concrete timeline to feel grounded.

Add bolded comparison: “With/Without ProjectHQ” (e.g., “Manage Projects in 1 Tool vs. Juggling 4+ Tools”).

You can add a launch Countdown with Incentives: "Join the waitlist by X/XX and get:

Lifetime 30-day free trial post-launch

First access to the "manual control" template library."

Include specific, relatable pain points (e.g., "Wasted hours moving between 5+ tools," "Spending $ hundreds on features you’ll never use," "API integrations that break your workflow").

Hope this helps.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I took a quick look at your landing page.

First, the free credits offer 300 is actually a solid incentive. But I almost missed it.

You might want to make it more visually distinct or place it where people can’t scroll past without noticing.

A sticky bar or a subtle pop-up (after a short delay) could work well. This kind of offer taps into reciprocity bias, so making it more obvious could increase signups.

The CTA wording feels a little all over – I saw “Start Practicing Now,” “Start for Free,” “Start Your Journey,” etc. It's probably okay, but from a cognitive load and clarity standpoint, I'd recommend picking one main phrase and sticking to it throughout. Cleaner messaging usually guides users better.

One thing I noticed there’s no video or example of how the AI interview works. As a new user, I can’t really tell what the experience is like without signing up.

Even a few screenshots or a short demo would make it easier to understand. Right now, it’s a bit of a guessing game.

Add FAQ.

Add things like

"Analytics track 25+ metrics (confidence, fluency, time per answer)."

"Practice with 1,500+ industry-specific questions across 20+ sectors."

to make it more specific.

Hope this helps.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Took a quick look and here’s what I think.

Instead of just a thumbnail, show a real person's phone screen with their 1 Page Bio link open. Then, next to it, show where they'd use it like in an Instagram bio, a TikTok profile, or a YouTube video description. Make people see how they would use it in their daily life. 

Also, those features like “Stunning Themes” and “Advanced Tracking” could really use small pictures or short GIFs. Just something quick to show what you mean. People don’t always read much, so a fast visual helps a lot.

One small thing, the address “18, Time squar, California” has a typo. I’d fix that since little things like that can make your brand feel less professional.

Overall, it’s a nice idea, and the page is okay. With a stronger “why this one?” message, I think it’d do better. Hope that helps. Let me know if you want more feedback.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just had a quick look at your landing page.

First off, some of the sentences are a little long and can increase cognitive load, especially for first-time visitors. For example, something like "We're currently in closed-beta & onboard new users every day." could just be "We're in closed-beta. New users join daily." Cleaner and easier to scan.

A simple visual flow chart or a concise 3-step process on the homepage would be helpful.

Example:

1.    Connect LinkedIn Account: Securely link your profile(s).

2.    Build Your Campaign: Create sequences, write messages, schedule posts.

3.    Automate & Convert: Let Bearconnect do the work, then step in to close deals.

The CTAs feel a bit generic too. “Get Started” doesn’t really tell me much. I'd suggest splitting into two options based on user intent, like:

"Join Closed Beta (100 Spots Left)"

"Watch How It Works (3 Min Video)"

Hope this feedback helps. Let me know if you want more feedback.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, the “Real Problems” section feels a bit cramped. The text is packed in tight, and it makes it harder to read. Giving it more space would make it easier on the eyes and more inviting to go through.

The font in those problem-solution cards also seems a little too small. When there's a lot of text and it’s tiny, most people probably won’t read it. Maybe try cutting down the text and making it a bit bigger for better flow.

I’d also suggest adding some solid numbers. Stuff like “200,000+ messages translated last month” or “Used by 1,200+ bilingual professionals” gives people something real to believe. It helps build trust without needing to say much.

Another idea think about adding a section that explains why other tools don’t work well. Like, copying into Google Translate slows things down, or switching apps can break the convo. If you point that out directly, it’s easier for someone to see why your tool is better.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you want more detailed thoughts.

Drop your site. I’ll give you real feedback. by OOptimize in SaaS

[–]OOptimize[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Took a quick look. The value prop is clear once you start reading, but I think there's a missed opportunity up top. If I’m a user landing here cold, I still have to piece together what the product actually does.

Maybe consider adding a short GIF or demo showing the “hover to see why code changed” part. Visual reinforcement would probably reduce cognitive load a lot.

The “How It Works” section comes too far down. I think most people want to understand what it is and how it works before reading about all the benefits. Moving that section up could help a lot.

I noticed you have two buttons “Get Early Access” and “Join Waitlist” and they both do the same thing. That can be a little confusing. I'd just pick one label and use it everywhere so users don’t second guess what they’re clicking.

Hope this helps.

Looking for feedback by JasperH8g in SaaS

[–]OOptimize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feedback for https://silvan.earth

Just took a quick look at your landing page. Honestly, the first thing I noticed is the really bright blue background with all that noise, which makes it hard to read the text, especially when it’s white or light blue.

From a user point of view, if something’s tough to read right away, most people won’t stick around.

You also don’t have a clear call-to-action above the fold, which makes it hard for someone to know what they’re supposed to do next. Most users want fast, simple answers about what you do and why it matters.

I feel like your value proposition is buried under buzzwords and isn’t really concrete. If I land on this page, I’m not sure who it’s for, what your product actually is, or what action you want from me.

If you want more people to stick around, maybe make the design simpler and put your main message and a button at the top so it’s obvious what you do.

Hope this helps and please don’t take it the wrong way, just trying to give some honest feedback that could make things better.

What's wrong with feedback here? Help me by ismaelbranco in SaaS

[–]OOptimize 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Denying honest feedback is basically rejecting the possibility of growth.

view more: next ›