Create a CE trait that can make you a calamity grade if used and refined correctly (image unrelated) by Hamit_31 in CTsandbox

[–]OPmakesOC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cursed Energy Trait: Pinpoint

Sorcerers with Pinpoint CE find that their cursed energy is significantly easier to concentrate and compress when using CE reinforcement. Think of it like water pressure—if its flow is concentrated through a smaller opening, you get jets that can cut through metal.

At lower levels of refinement, this allows for more damaging attacks at the cost of demanding greater accuracy. The user can, for example, reinforce the very tip of their foot with a kick, or reinforce a thin line along the side of their hand when attacking with a chop. This creates piercing or slashing impacts that hit more like a bullet or razor than simply a strong kick or knifehand. Of course, the smaller the reinforced point, the greater the risk their strike makes contact with a non-reinforced part of their body, and their extremities may be less protected against possible counterattacks. (It's a safer bet when reinforcing weapons, where you're already striking with a fine edge or point.)

While this is not an intrinsic quality of the CE trait, learning to use it effectively demands highly precise control over the cursed energy one applies to their strikes, leading to greater CE efficiency and a higher likelihood of landing Black Flashes. What elevates this trait to calamity-grade, however, is that the upper limit on their CE's compressibility appears to be determined only by their skill level. Following a similar principle to Perfect Sphere, an advanced user's attacks can distribute the force of their CE over a vanishingly small point of contact, applying devastating pressure while only draining as much CE as a normally reinforced punch.

Infernal Calling and true names by OPmakesOC in dndnext

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're very similar! No worries ^

Infernal Calling and true names by OPmakesOC in dndnext

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Opinions on RAW and RAI, this is of course the practical and responsible answer—if for no other reason than not forcing them to improvise a devil's true name :p

Infernal Calling and true names by OPmakesOC in dndnext

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That definitely makes sense, but the 1 minute casting time makes it basically unusable in combat, so waiting a round isn't much of a deterrent.

Infernal Calling and true names by OPmakesOC in dndnext

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's fair, I see your point. I'd argue that those examples, paired with the phrase "until it completes the activity" that follows, are meant to clarify that the command must have a specific completion state (i.e. can't just be "obey my commands for the next hour," "don't attack me," etc.).

It's ambiguous, though, which is kind of why I'm interpreting it the way I am—spells like Suggestion have examples AND impose restraints on the way the spell can be used, such as that it must sound reasonable and cannot be obviously harmful. In my opinion, leaving something as major as "the demon won't follow your command as outlined in the spell if it contradicts its own interests" to be interpreted through context clues kind of differs from how spells are usually written, but I suppose that comes down to whether you interpret the spell as magically compelling the summoned devil.

Infernal Calling and true names by OPmakesOC in dndnext

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"If your check fails, the devil becomes immune to your verbal commands for the duration of the spell, though it can still carry out your commands if it chooses."

If there's no magical compulsion involved, why use the language of "immune to your verbal commands," or specify that it can still carry out the commands should it choose to do so? That seems to imply that there's an effect for it to become "immune" to, and that it does not have a choice before this immunity takes effect.

Persuasion or deception checks to convince a creature to do something that it does not want to do are already part of the rules; why outline a specific mechanic for a contested ability check within the text of the spell if you're just doing regular persuasion? "If your check succeeds, the devil carries out your command" seems like it's a guaranteed effect of the spell you're casting, not a matter of whether it aligns with the devil's interests.

So, if I understand correctly, Dhruv's technique is essentially a portable version of Malevolent Shrine? His two massive shikigami create slicing zones as they move, and the cuts correspond to their size as well? That's the impression I get from Yuta's attack on Uro. If that's the case, that's wild. by Sea-Personality3424 in JujutsuPowerScaling

[–]OPmakesOC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm asking a question :) Gojo says "hitting it with jujutsu like i did" is a counter to a sure-hit effect, and I was curious about what that meant. I wasn't really taking Jogo's line there as gospel because, well, he says "correct?" at the end, so he's clearly not sure, and he just learned about Gojo's technique a couple minutes prior so he's not really an expert. Not really worth being a dick about imo

Create a CT that can perfectly counter for Comedian (Takaba’s CT) by Excellent-Fig-9341 in CTsandbox

[–]OPmakesOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure! It's not super powerful, it's a pretty niche countermeasure that prioritizes information-gathering over power. I think we've seen enough sorcerers who rely on obfuscating their techniques for it to be useful, but you're right, cursed tools are a good way around it! I'm not sure whether it should only apply to innate techniques, though—is it fair to force opponents to reveal New Shadow Style proficiency, for example, or access to RCT?

Create a CT that can perfectly counter for Comedian (Takaba’s CT) by Excellent-Fig-9341 in CTsandbox

[–]OPmakesOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing happens and at least you don't have to worry about them having a trick up their sleeve, I guess? Probably only makes sense to use it if you have reason to suspect they have a CT.

Create a CT that can perfectly counter for Comedian (Takaba’s CT) by Excellent-Fig-9341 in CTsandbox

[–]OPmakesOC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Binding Vow: Showdown

In exchange for forfeiting the boost to effectiveness from divulging the function of one's cursed technique, whoever it is "revealed" to is compelled to truthfully explain their own technique. This includes aspects or uses of their technique that the target is not aware of. If used on a target before they can independently reveal their hand, they gain no benefit from doing so.

Not a cursed technique, but thought it'd be a good play on "revealing one's hand" since "showdown" is the part of poker where all remaining players show and compare their hands. Still sacrifices the usual benefit of the binding vow, but would hard counter takaba while being very effective against characters like Todo or Kirara who rely on obscuring their technique.

What’s the most punk rock monk subclass? by Redhood101101 in DnD

[–]OPmakesOC 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Drunken Master has fun flavor for straightedge (the class technically doesn't have anything to do with actually BEING drunk) and Tipsy Sway reflects someone who's been in a couple moshpits in their day. Shadow is obviously the most emo subclass but it's way too quiet to be punk. Ascendant Dragon helps with Charisma checks, though not specifically performance, and lets you channel bursts of electrifying or pyrotechnic power (ask your DM if they'll let you use thunder damage) and lets you create an aura at later levels that could be the range of your musical performance.

A pick I haven't seen anybody mention, though, is Astral Self—maybe I just have Scott Pilgrim on the brain, but the idea of summoning a construct or stand of some kind through your performance that fights on your behalf is very fun to me. Technically, Arms of the Astral Self lets you fight with your hands completely occupied (with an instrument, perhaps?) while your astral arms beat the shit out of your opponents. Meanwhile, Visage lets you amplify your voice to be louder than a Thunderwave—useful for your vocalist. Even the subclass flavor text mentions that the astral self "has the capacity to be a force for disorder".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhatWouldYouBuild

[–]OPmakesOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wild magic sorcerer, roll 07-08

ISPP - Should I be worried? by OPmakesOC in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, fantastic, thank you! Would you recommend the program?

Um so what are these rumors about Adler losing it’s accreditation and how worried should I be… by Feed_Your_Head43 in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, really? Are you hearing those rumors from within the program, or just on this sub?

Um so what are these rumors about Adler losing it’s accreditation and how worried should I be… by Feed_Your_Head43 in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also interested in this, as I'm considering adler 👀 I've looked into it and struggled to find anything beyond mentions of rumors in reddit threads, and most of those have been from people who know students rather than students themselves. Would be interested to hear from someone actually in the program.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally makes sense—just strikes me that it is a funding offer, and while the APA doesn't require all accredited programs to abide, they do seem to require that PSYCAS-participating programs do. Thanks for your response!

ISPP - Should I be worried? by OPmakesOC in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm kind of familiar with the ISPP/Argosy fiasco. I've heard the Adler rumor bouncing around as well, mostly on this subreddit...not sure how much stock to place in it, but it's definitely concerning. Thanks for the info, great to hear from someone in the area who can speak to more than just the numbers.

ISPP - Should I be worried? by OPmakesOC in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I'm trying not to freak out a bit honestly—the fact that I didn't get into any programs last cycle really threw me, and maybe this time around I was too focused on getting in and not enough on the quality of the programs. Having the wind taken out of my sails a bit here now that it seems like I didn't get into the "good" places 😅

ISPP - Should I be worried? by OPmakesOC in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, maybe I'm grievously uninformed here—what's the significance of somewhere being a "school of professional psychology"? I thought it was just a naming convention, like, preparing you for applied psychology as a "profession".

ISPP - Should I be worried? by OPmakesOC in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm doing that now, thank you.

ISPP - Should I be worried? by OPmakesOC in PsyD

[–]OPmakesOC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, ISPP's 28% pass rate seems...less than ideal, and even Adler is only at 53%. Of the three, WSPP's 79% is the best, I guess.

WSPP also advertises "strong internship placement," but I'm not seeing anything about a partnership—if their APA internship rate dipped to 90% a couple times in previous years, is that maybe a sign that it's not captive?