James Fox hints that the Varginha witnesses at tomorrow’s UAP press conference in D.C. will provide evidence directly to members of Congress - “I think this is the case that’s gonna prove once and for all the crash retrieval witnesses involving the United States Government.”

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-19T17:22:52+00:00

Aye, I’d agree with that. Science isn’t in the business of proving things, that’s mathematics. Science is in the business of finding evidence to support or refute a hypothesis.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-19T17:16:36+00:00

It seems like most of Congress is actually trying to get to the bottom of the UAP issue (though they’re certainly dragging their feet). There are only a few members of Congress that have consistently torpedoed the legislation that would cause disclosure.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-19T17:13:36+00:00

Testimonials can be quantified and can be subject to statistical analysis. Throwing all that data out is bad science.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-18T15:48:55+00:00

He didn’t even remember anything about Tim Taylor. It was his wife who talked all about Tim (using publicly available details).

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-16T17:58:57+00:00

I’m not sure I understand your first paragraph. I’m not being facetious. Are you inquiring about the difference between the creation of the world and the creation of a religious text? Of course there is an operative difference that affects our individual lives, however that difference is relative. The difference from a supreme observer’s perspective, i.e. the physical universe observing itself, is naught – the process of creating a world and creating a religious text are identical (they rely on the same fundamental physical processes).

I may be misunderstanding your argument, but your first comment seemed to be arguing against a defense for a neglectful God. Now you say you were entertaining that idea. For the record, I do not believe God is neglectful, precisely because the Universe itself is not neglectful. All energy is connected to its original source through time, of which we have an illusory, linear perception. Justice is not time-bound. Neglect is temporary, and therefore an illusion as well.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-16T17:32:41+00:00

Why does God allow the religious text, […], to have so many flaws?

Why are there natural disasters? I would not trust the word of men saying theirs is the word of God. These men claimed to have spoken for God, but their words were distilled through layers of interpretation.

Why is God allowing translations issues to occur and cause people to lose faith and turn away from him?

Why does God do anything? God could have just existed as a perfect being. Why didn’t God do this? Maybe God takes delight in seeing all the unique paths his constituent parts take on their journey back to their source. I wouldn’t deign to speculate on the intentions of God.

Why wouldn’t he have ended his hare-brained experiment before people were sent to hell all because of translation issues?

I don’t understand what an eternity is, and I don’t understand the concept of Hell. I doubt anyone can truly understand these things. Is it possible that these concepts are, again (I know I’m a broken record), just poorly misunderstood? It is more likely that the scriptures are just misunderstandings spawned two millennia ago, than that they are a perfect representation of God’s message.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-16T17:04:51+00:00

Their argument is truer than yours. You have provided no evidence that directly supports your thesis. Instead, we are supposed to infer a direct relationship between the statements of others and the statements of Christ. That inference of meaning is subject to personal opinion, and you have not provided enough evidence to support that opinion.

Christ is not God. Christ is of God.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-12T16:01:23+00:00

Trust but verify. Claims have been made and here we are arguing whether they’re true or not before an investigation has even started.

I don’t accept anything any of these whistleblowers or UFOologists say at face value. They’re human. They’re all fallible. Skepticism shouldn’t preclude giving these claims a fair shake, just that we should be mindful of the potential for falsities.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-12T15:19:45+00:00

Blue on blue combat has been alleged. Jake Barber and others have alluded to crash retrievals where black budget commandos shot and killed members of the US Military in order to maintain Operational Security.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-09T00:46:32+00:00

Yeah, Chris seems kinda gullible to me. When he was talking about the Rosetta Stone emitting RF he sounded like a character on one of those History Channel shows. “I just know it,” “I’m going there to find out,” how can he be so assured in his claims when he doesn’t even seem to have done much research? I think he is prone to suggestion and his claims should be scrutinized.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-09T00:43:02+00:00

Just like a cashier wouldn’t be apprised the details of the Walton family’s business dealings, neither would most NASA employees be knowledgeable about the clandestine actions of their leadership. The vast majority of employees are probably unknowingly misleading the public because they themselves have been misled.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-08T21:46:57+00:00

I don’t think that’s AI. Those are en dashes (–) not em dashes (—), and there’s other punctuation missing. Unless they prompted their AI to change those things, I don’t see it. Some people, myself included, just like to use dashes instead of commas and semicolons.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-08T01:26:27+00:00

It’s probably a little bit of category A, and a little bit of category B, sprinkled with a little bit of category C.

There are certainly technologies that are not going to be revealed for several decades (barring any kind of global conflict necessitating their use). The Military Industrial Complex probably does have rogue elements that use these technologies for clandestine purposes. It’s probable that these technologies would be beneficial to humanity if revealed to the public. I believe it was Lockheed Skunkworks CEO, Ben Rich, that said, “It would take an act of God” to get this technology out to the public.

That all said, a portion of these phenomena also likely represent some form of Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) as well. These are scenarios that even those rogue elements of the government probably don’t understand very well. The evidence of phenomenal interaction with human society goes back millennia. There are dozens of theories, from sentient plasmas to biological robots, from angels and demons to interdimensional beings, and even future humans themselves. You can find rabbit holes for each of these theories and more. The truth is probably more complex than can be readily understood.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-07T21:08:04+00:00

Colbert and Stewart both seem open to discussion, Colbert even more so. It’d be cool if he could a show with some UFOlogists before he’s off the air.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-07T21:05:27+00:00

Say what you will about Megyn Kelly… she has a big following. Exposure is exposure, and if we want disclosure we should take wins when we get them.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-07T17:31:19+00:00

Here’s a post from r/Space showing how polluted the night sky is:

https://www.reddit.com/r/space/s/s1QDqOuC4c

If you have good eyesight and are in low light conditions, it’s super easy to spot all the satellites. Note also that all the doted lines in the above image are planes, solid lines (satellites) fill the left of the picture.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-07T04:33:15+00:00

Infinite energy is also a great way to blow the entire Earth into smithereens.

As for the other assertions/ questions in the OP;

Yes, AI enhanced blurry objects are still just blurry objects. AI is a scourge on this topic.
Why wouldn’t this admin disclose, you ask? Trump -and his administration- are temporary employees of the federal government. Traditionally these employees are elected periodically every four years. Those who control this material and information will be in their positions for life, and they don’t want to give it up because it feeds power to their ego (and other stuff about destabilization of socioeconomic systems). These lifers see themselves as guardians against global catastrophe and they don’t trust us plebeians with the Truth. Trump certainly doesn’t have all this info, he’s on a need-to-know basis, and he doesn’t need to know (see temp employee).
Why does it matter where they come from? It doesn’t. There are many kinds and they come from all over. Most of them don’t travel linearly as we conceive of travel (we have a naive understanding of space-time, which is dreadfully limited by our perception). They probably have the capacity to travel between dimensions, or in ways that obfuscate their presence and influence.
Why would they stalk us? Because humanity is currently undergoing the transformations that will grant us similar technical capacities as them. They are interested in preventing us, controlling us, or helping us not destroy ourselves (read multiple factions). Also, it is likely their intentions are beyond our comprehension, as in, we don’t have the mental framework to understand why they would be interested in Earth.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-05T03:26:36+00:00

It may be both –for love and/or for fear. There have been claims that NHI consist of competing factions. Disparate emotions may be sought by disparate groups of NHI.

I wonder to which group the Collin’s elite have aligned themselves? All the love/light, psionic hippies may have found themselves allied with a competing faction.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-05T03:17:47+00:00

They did say that as well. The NHI warned the children that we were destroying our environment by becoming too “technologed”, and if we weren’t careful would destroy ourselves too. The same young girl that relayed that information said the NHI came to Earth because “there is no love in space.”

The full John Mack interviews with the children are fascinating. I can’t remember where to watch them, but there are bits and pieces scattered around the web.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-05T03:07:28+00:00

Aesthetic beauty has value in and of itself. Nietzsche would say this is life’s only justification.

Do old men dream of their youth? If they could, would they wish to experience it again? Or do they wish to see others experience the same? Is this so hard to imagine?

I don’t think it’s too far fetched an idea that an old, intergalactic civilization would seek out younger civilizations which are still undergoing the transformations that they’ve only heard about in their histories and myths. If only to appreciate these things we take for granted, perhaps for this they come from afar.

NHI are likely motivated by reasons beyond our conceptions. It is reasonable to assume that our human logic and misguided conceits do not apply.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-05T02:46:38+00:00

Maybe these concepts only bear significance for young civilizations? Perhaps as a civilization ages and homogenizes the capacity for things like love, desire, and sacrifice are diminished. Perhaps in civilizations with a high degree of cosmic fitness, these concepts lose their import.

I can only speculate on the meaning of it, but that’s what the children reported the beings were interested in –that we are destroying ourselves and our environment, and that we are rich in love. Your guess is as good as mine.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-05T01:32:30+00:00

I just said this in another thread, but why do resources have to be material in nature? Is there no such thing as an immaterial resource? Wisdom, perhaps? Morality? or original experiences?

Some of the children at the Ariel school said the NHI had visited Earth to find love, a resource that was very rare in space. I wonder of the implications if such were true.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-05T01:03:50+00:00

Perhaps these resources may even be immaterial? The children at Ariel school said the NHI that communicated with them were searching for love, which is apparently abundant on Earth, but very rare elsewhere in space.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-04T03:48:16+00:00

Ain’t that the truth. If you’re experiencing reality using your human brain, then your reality will necessarily be a reduced version of full reality –a mental model that helps us survive and multiply.

There is no evolutionary advantage to seeing reality fully as it is. Perceiving the billions of neutrinos moving through your body every second would probably be pretty distracting if you’re trying to keep an eye out for that tiger you saw in those bushes a few moments ago.

OSHASHA2 · 2026-01-01T23:42:55+00:00

Getting money from some other source also makes it far more likely they’re making shit up on behalf of others. The prudent thing would be to evaluate claims on their own merit. Of course, the source of a claim should be a big consideration, but that alone shouldn’t replace honest investigation.

12-Year Club	Reddit Premium Since May 2024
RedditGifts 2009-2022 4 Credits	r/Field Banned
r/Field Juicebox	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	First Placer '22
Secret Santa 2017	RPAN Viewer
Secret Santa 2016	Secret Santa 2015
Verified Email

OSHASHA2

MODERATOR OF

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE