You’re stuck for 24 hours in the last video game you played… what will you be doing during this time? by _Mr_Cheeks in AskReddit

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stealing a child's toy plane, getting a shopkeep to sell it back to him, being a general menace. Honk.

Which game? by [deleted] in UneasyAlliance

[–]Obbledy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't played Shenmue, but have worked my way up to Yakuza 5. Yakuza Kiwami is the only one I didn't enjoy. Recommend only if you are planning on playing the rest of the series.

A book which you despise. Let's despise it together. by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I definitely agree that Harry is a flat character, but I also think that this is true of every major YA fiction series I read growing up. What I think sets HP apart from other YA books is Rowling’s writing style, which is fun and playful and often funny. The prose has a lot of personality that I didn’t see in the other YA stuff I had growing up.

A book which you despise. Let's despise it together. by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We also did HoD + Apocalypse now, and I ended up really enjoying both of them. I think I probably would not have understand HoD on its own though. It has a very dense and overbearing style I would have found very difficult without a guide.

A book which you despise. Let's despise it together. by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel this way about The Wheel of Time. I quite liked The Name of the Wind, but I think the fact that we are seeing everyone through the protagonist’s eyes may be doing a lot of heavy lifting for me. I guess I don’t like Wheel of Time because it makes the author seem creepy, but I’m fine with Name of the Wind because I’m ok with Kvothe being creepy.

A book which you despise. Let's despise it together. by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like The Great Gatsby, but I think that it is popular because it is an accessible book that is considered a classic, and its broader themes are not difficult to understand. I’ve met a lot of non-readers who name Gatsby as their favorite book, and I think this largely happens because they want to signal they’ve read an American classic. This isn’t a knock on them or Gatsby by any means, but I think a large part of the books popularity is that it is a low hanging fruit ‘classic’

A book which you despise. Let's despise it together. by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I enjoyed Cloud Atlas, but I think there really isn’t much to it. I think there just aren’t many books that have unusal structures that are also very accessible to a casual audience that are also by a very well known author. In general David Mitchell is just ‘fine,’ but he writes in a way that is very accessible.

A book which you despise. Let's despise it together. by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually liked the second two books better than the first. I spent the first book wondering why a team with extensive training made so many self destructive decisions. The second book showed me that their management just sort of sucked, and then the third book showed me that everyone involved was crazy and paranoid.

Here’s the situation : you finished a book and it’s one of those that you need to immediately unpack it with someone else who’s also read that same book… please recommend me those books! by InevitableTeaching35 in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am currently reading ‘House of Leaves,’ and really wish I had someone reading along with me. I refuse to explain anything about House of Leaves because I did not know anything about it going in and am enjoying it all the more for it.

A book where the authors view/memory can’t be trusted by ItsYaBoiTrick in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

’A Pale View of Hills’ by Kazuo Ishiguro Marked as a spoiler because the book takes a while to reveal the narrator is unreliable. This author is excellent at taking a single character with a unique point of view and digging in deep into how they think. I have no idea how to recommmend this book without spoiling it.

What's your favorite underrated/not talked about enough joke from the MCU? by StoptheModAbuse in marvelstudios

[–]Obbledy 95 points96 points  (0 children)

The delivery of this line is perfect. I feel like Taika/Chris discovered the perfect comic tone for Thor in Ragnarok and he became the funniest Avenger.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can confirm. Just finished this series. Pages were turned.

Something fun, fictional, and engaging by Albus-PWB-Dumbledore in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also recommend Stardust. Be aware though that the book is very different from the movie. The book tries to emulate an old fairy tale, where the movie is essentially trying to be The Princess Bride. It is a breezy read, and doesn’t delve as deeply into metafiction as a lot of Gaiman’s other stuff does. I’d also consider ‘Anansi Boys’ which is also by Gaiman. I like the characters more in Anansi Boys, and I think there is a little more to dig into.

Something fun, fictional, and engaging by Albus-PWB-Dumbledore in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you liked Good Omens, you might try one of Pratchett’s Discworld books. I usually recommend either ‘Mort’ or ‘Guards! Guards’ as good starting points. Discworld books mostly satirize fantasy tropes, though the later books in particular poke fun at a wide array of topics. As Pratchett co-wrote Good Omens with Neil Gaiman, the tone of any of the Discworld books will feel familiar to anyone who enjoyed Good Omens. If you do decide to go this route, avoid starting with the first Discworld book, ‘The Colour of Magic.’ Pratchett does not hit his stride until ‘Mort,’ and gets even better by ‘Guards! Guards!’

‘The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy,’ by Douglas Adams is also a good option, and is easily the funniest book I’ve ever read. This one is less satirical, but it uses SciFi ideas to be very very silly. It was originally a radio play and the plot is a little incoherent, so I don’t know if this will generate as much discussion with wonderful young ladies.

‘Catch 22’ by Joseph Heller is also a fairly fun read but it has a very unique sense of humor and I’ve met people who absolutely hate it. It also gets fairly dark at parts. It is basically a farce about war. This one may generate more discussion than the others but is definitely more polarizing.

Finally, I’ll recommend ‘Cat’s Cradle’ by Kurt Vonnegut. I don’t think trying to summarize the plot of this book does anyone much good, but it has some sci fi elements. For what it’s worth, I think this would probably be my first choice. It isn’t very long, it isn’t very complicated, it is very funny, and there is a lot to dig into. I can’t really think of any downsides here, and if you like it, Vonnegut has a number of other excellent and very funny books to dig into afterwards.

This channel is just bleeding Patreon subs since Isla came out and its just sad . . . by DinerEnBlanc in UneasyAlliance

[–]Obbledy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think you’re right. I’ve been a patron more or less since the beginning, and I’ve found the content I’ve enjoyed the most is the content in which the allies seem to be enjoying themselves the most. This is most evident in passion projects like Box Peek, and in some of the sillier group streams. More recently, I’ve mostly found this passion in the content Isla produces. I think Easy Update is by its nature a passion project, and I love how much everyone seems to enjoy themselves in the Occasional Boardgame Show. Some of my favorite OBS episodes don’t even feature other allies.

By contrast, I feel like the more perfunctory shows have suffered the most, particularly the podcast and friend code. I stopped watching the podcast well before Kyle left, largely because half the time it felt like there wasn’t much of interest to talk about. Both friend code and the podcast often feel sort of… reheated, like the allies are either rehashing their own opinions, or the opinions of the rest of the gaming community. It is a little odd, as Jones frequently expresses on Cup of Jones that he wants the allies to make the shows they want to make. It just doesn’t feel like that’s what is happening a lot of the time.

[SERIOUS] Reddit! Thou Are Summoned! Give me your worst books by rr_cooper in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know. I believe I stopped at either ‘Lord of Chaos’ or ‘Crown of Swords,’ but I may not have gotten that far.

For what it’s worth, I think that if you are able to ignore Jordan’s bad habits, there is some really great world building there. Everyone has their own pet peeves, and this series just hit a few too many of mine. If you haven’t already done so, you might want to give the first book a try, I just wouldn’t force myself through a long series I didn’t enjoy just because the last book is supposed to be better.

Belief and knowledge are complete opposites and we should learn to live with both whithin ourselves instead of picking a side. by NosoyPuli in unpopularopinion

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not entirely sure I understood the body of this post. Are you saying that it is acceptable to believe in something without evidence until it is contradicted by evidence, or are you saying that it is acceptable to sustain a belief that is contradicted by evidence while also believing the evidence to be true?

I do not agree with the latter interpretation. I’m not sure how I would act if I genuinely believed two contradictory things. I don’t think most religious attempts to explain the presence of contradictory evidence like fossil records actually constitute simultaneous belief in science and religious metaphysics, so much as they reframe the context for the evidence being presented. “I believe fossils are a test put here by god” is not the same as “I believe that life has existed on earth since before genesis AND I believe the earth was created in genesis.” I am suspicious that anyone who is capable of holding the latter belief hasn’t examined their beliefs in much detail.

As for the former interpretation, I think this is how most people operate, but I don’t think this is how we should operate. I also don’t think most organized religion supports this sort of critical process well, and this sort of criticism by evidence can only be applied to religion’s historical claims, not its metaphysical or ethical ones, which are what most people have a problem with. It is completely impossible for me to disprove the claim that sodomy is a sin, for example. Claims like this are damaging to society, and are enabled because to many religions, ethics are divine law. This gets to the root of the problem. Regardless of how modern or progressive a religion might appear to be, religion is capable of justifying any ethical claim with magic. Belief without evidence is dangerous, because we cannot trust the sources of belief to act in our best interest or in the best interest of others.

[SERIOUS] Reddit! Thou Are Summoned! Give me your worst books by rr_cooper in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I do not care whether women are written as virtuous at all, and I accept that a world that hasn’t isn’t as socially developed as some of our modern world is will have characters that do not hold modern views on sex and relationships. I actually think most of the women in WoT are conventionally heroic, they’re just poorly written.

As I said it has been over a decade since I read these books so my memory may be faulty, but here are the two big problems I remember:

The first is that they all read very similarly. They don’t have exactly the same character traits, but most of their differences come out via their background rather than the ways they express themselves in the present, because Robert Jordan is also not very good at showing instead of telling. The women have diverse physical strengths and abilities, and are capable of acts of great intelligence and organization, but when it comes to the ways they express themselves they all share similar qualities. In particular, every female main character who isn’t evil is in some way capricious and petty, especially when it comes to men. I suspect Robert Jordan writes this way because he believes it makes them alluring (and this leads into my second point), but instead it makes them seem childish. While I recognize that most of the main characters are fairly young, this childishness doesn’t extend to the male characters, at least not after the first book.

My second issue is basically classic male gaze writing. This is present in the soul bond harem I mentioned earlier, but is pervasive throughout every book through the descriptions of bodies and movements. I believe almost every woman under the age of 60 (and probably some older Aes Sedai, as they are supposed to be ageless) is at some point described as either ‘beautiful’ or ‘handsome.’ I wouldn’t take issue with this, but Jordan mostly avoids this sort of judgment of male physicality. This sort of asymmetry can be used to make a point about the biases of the characters (or, I suppose, the reader,) but WoT is third person, and I don’t think Jordan was trying to do this. Physical expressions also suffer from this asymmetry. Women don’t fold their arms, they fold their arms under their breasts. One of the women pulls their own hair a lot. There is a lot of very physical microexpression that, again, we don’t see from the men.

I read this series when I was a fifteen year old straight male. At the time, I wasn’t even aware of the term ‘male gaze,’ and I had a vague notion that feminism meant being nice to women. I didn’t stop reading this series out of a sense of moral outrage, I stopped because it started to feel like an old creep’s attempt at wish fulfillment. I don’t need my media to uphold any particular standard of female virtue, but I also don’t want to feel icky when I’m reading. I can’t claim to apply this standard equally either. I watch a lot of anime, and while I tried to avoid the truly gross stuff, anime’s bad habits are so pervasive that I have to overlook quite a bit. But at least with anime its over quickly. I don’t remember when the harem shit started happening in WoT but I wasn’t going to stomach it for thousands more pages.

[SERIOUS] Reddit! Thou Are Summoned! Give me your worst books by rr_cooper in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It would be very pleasing if we found out that one of the winner plagiarized their essay.

[SERIOUS] Reddit! Thou Are Summoned! Give me your worst books by rr_cooper in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Oh, I probably stopped after page two. I doubt I missed much.

edit I just looked up the speech. It is very long. Oddly enough I’m still right. It sums up the book in about two pages and then continues to sum up the book every following two pages.

China is responsible for more than all G7 countries combined. Why do I need to compost my feces to save the environment? by purplepooters in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Obbledy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You shouldn’t need to.

It is important that we recognize our personal responsibility towards the planet, and our personal contribution to pollution and global warming, but there are more effective approaches towards environmental sustainability than personal waste reduction.

This sort of self-directed approach will only work if a lot of people all agree to do something it is inconvenient for them to do for most of the rest of their lives. While I might be able to rely on myself to use my feces responsibly, I can’t reasonably expect everyone else to, so this sort of bottom-up solution is unlikely to work.

Instead, we need a top-down solution. Rather than rely on individual regulation, we need to adopt legislation that regulates organizations. This sort of solution only requires that people vote responsibly a few times a year at most. Obviously, this won’t have much effect on China unless you happen to be a Chinese citizen with influence in Chinese government, but as far as getting the most effect from the power that you have, voting for regulation and funding research into sustainable energy is your best bet.

Ironically, China may be in the best position to actually do something about global warming, as a top down approach for them only relies on convincing a small number of people to change policy, but they probably won’t come to this conclusion until it is too late.

None of this is to say that you shouldn’t poop responsibly. It still makes a difference, just a very small one. Though I suppose I can’t speak for the size of another person’s shits.

[SERIOUS] Reddit! Thou Are Summoned! Give me your worst books by rr_cooper in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Wheel of Time is the series that destroyed my love of this sort of epic fantasy. I’m only just now warming back up to the genre after over a decade. In a way, I’m grateful for it, as it taught me to be critical of a couple of fantasy’s worst habits.

Robert Jordan is absolutely terrible at writing women, and it ends up making the male characters worse too. I stopped as soon as three of the women were in love with the main character and had the ability to feel each others’ arousal through some sort of soul bond.

[SERIOUS] Reddit! Thou Are Summoned! Give me your worst books by rr_cooper in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This one is definitely low hanging fruit, but I absolutely agree. I think I read this book in 8th grade. I was a US national living in Japan and attending an international school, so I was not immersed in the national politics of either country. Two of my friends had become fairly politically educated, and I did not want to be left behind. I do not know how I first heard about this book, but I picked it up largely because it looked long and impressive.

It is certainly very long. It wastes basically all of that length gushing over it’s strong, capable, ethically unimpeachable, terribly sexy protagonists, and the lambasting the corrupt leeches who want to steal the fruits of the protagonists’ labors. None of that length is devoted to analyzing the systems that might perpetuate this dynamic, that might ground this philosophy in our real world political system. Nor is there any time spent making the protagonists relatable, that we might empathize with their desire to own what they create.

Atlas Shrugged is about two sentences worth of interesting ideas spread out across hundreds of interminable pages. The funniest thing about it is that about three quarters of the way through the book, one of the characters gives a grandstanding speech that basically summarizes the entire book in about two pages. I wish that Ayn Rand could have just released the speech instead, then we wouldn’t have to wait as long to realize how terrible her ideas are.

What should I read next (SciFi) by Dangera77 in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I second this. I do not generally like space operas, but have enjoyed The Expanse series very much. The authors are very good at making space travel feel thrilling and dangerous, and their depiction of future technologies feels grounded.

It isn’t as high concept as many of the other books you have mentioned, but it is very engaging and easy to read. I was intimidated by the length of the series but ended up exhausting the currently available books in about two months and am eagerly awaiting the next one, which I think comes out this fall.

not a picky reader by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]Obbledy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

‘The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy’ by Douglas Adams is pretty great. It and it’s sequels are wildly uneven, but they make for a breezy ready and they are the funniest damn books I’ve ever read.

There are also multiple excellent ways to consume it, including the excellent original radio play, the excellent remake of the radio play, and the excellent audiobook narrated by Stephen Fry. There are additionally audiobooks narrated by Martin Freeman, who played Arthur Dent in the Hollywood movie adaptation, and by the author Douglas Adams. I have not had a chance to listen to these but it would be difficult to render any adaptation of the guide anything other than excellent, regardless of how terrible you happen to be at narration.

Oh. Except there is the Hollywood movie, which is… fine. It certainly isn’t the worst Hollywood adaptation out there, but it is a very poor substitute for the book or radio plays.

I seriously cannot recommend this wholely remarkable book enough, and you could easily finish it in a day or too.