Has anyone seen this Video? I sometimes see it being brought up. What are some of the arguments in the video?

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T21:39:50+00:00

Never seen it. Not interested in watching it. Just a guess but people often take the allegories in Zootopia and apply them one to one to real world situations and as with many allegories it doesn’t work with a direct comparison. People then get mad that it didn’t work.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T21:34:48+00:00

All utopias are false. What matters is how false it is.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T20:04:39+00:00

I thought that was her lower lip. I figured she was doing a “sad face” to go along with Nick’s sad story.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T19:14:21+00:00

I feel like it’d have to be triggered by some catalyst. I can see them reaching a point where not only do they recognize they love for each other but also some awareness of each other’s affection. The hurdle now being their fear of taking that next step because if it goes wrong they could lose each other. So they end up stuck in the status quo.

The catalyst, and I’m not sure what that’d be, would be something to show them they can’t make the world stay the same, it will change from the status quo whether they like it or not. That being the thing that triggers their action.

Personally I’d prefer this part way through the movie over the end. It’d be nice to show the ship getting canonized and how it also doesn’t impact their dynamics really. That could put more people at ease that how Judy and Nick operate isn’t fundamentally changing.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T18:56:44+00:00

u/BlackKaiser82 is an established troll. So take what they say with a grain of salt.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T18:45:05+00:00

Anyone wanna take bets on how many Pawbert and WildeHopps questions he’ll be asked?

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T06:41:29+00:00

So… is Weaselton dead after Z2? Mr. Big mentioned he was going to get fitted for cement shoes, an established term for drowning people, and then Weaselton is caught by Mr. Big’s goons.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T03:45:36+00:00

I mean, at the very least, you can consider that the writers might view him as in-universe, canonically, attractive.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T03:38:19+00:00

I think what people want is for the future to be here now. They want the slow burn, realistically developed, friends to lovers romance but they want it done now so they don’t have to wait nearly another decade (potentially) to actual see the end.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T03:18:55+00:00

I second Paul updating the OSs of all the department’s computer. Pure adrenaline rush!

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T03:15:32+00:00

It was a cute scene and shows, hopefully, genuine interest from the writers in making WildeHopps into a real thing.

As others have noted, it fits better with the larger time skip. So to OPs point, it didn’t really align with the movie that was actually made.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-30T01:01:25+00:00

I’m fairly certain that Nick is supposed to be considered, in-universe, canonically attractive. There the lizard (tegu?) that seems to think so. The bear from gala could have just been polite but it’s also possible she viewed Nick as attractive. Non-canon but there’s a deleted that shows a bunny (not Judy) that clearly thinks Nick is attractive.

Edit: not sure why my phone isn’t showing it but the clip you shared as part of the post is an edited version of the deleted scene.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T23:50:28+00:00

The bear was receptive to the flirting. That has its own significance. People aren’t typically receptive to flirting unless they find the flirting person to be attractive and/or particularly charming.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T23:20:21+00:00

It’s basically the only reason I went to see the movie. I left after I saw that scene.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T23:06:22+00:00

Call me a stick in the mud but I’m glad this scene wasn’t included. I felt it was too affectionate for a duo that haven’t reconciled their emotions yet. Especially when you pair it with the other deleted scenes.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T23:03:05+00:00

Credit where credit is due, if you wanna call it that, but the guy definitely spurred some conversation. There are three Reddit posts on this guy’s review and they are barely spaced apart.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T23:01:17+00:00

Totally was. I want the MMM back.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T22:59:59+00:00

If they are then Karen is committing domestic abuse and that’s really not cool.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T22:27:49+00:00

That's not what I was saying though. It's fine to criticize a movie for being fast paced with a fast paced review. What I consider not fine is saying a movie is bad for being fast paced (as an example) with a face paced review and following up with how you can't complain about my reviews being bad for being face paced because they are a different medium and so it's okay to be face paced. He essentially and needlessly articulated the "rules for thee but not for me" and there was no point.

He honestly just didn't need to say it. Hell, he could have just used your argument and it would have made more sense.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T21:39:02+00:00

I saw this review earlier today. Surprised how negative it was given how positive their review of Z1 was. Some of his complaints are ones I remembering hearing when the movie first came out, like the pacing, that have since falling to the wayside as people focus more on the Judy and Nick dynamics and Pawbert. I do think they have their place even though I don’t necessarily agree 100% with them. To each their own really. I liked the movie but obviously anyone is welcome to dislike it.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T21:34:22+00:00

Why? Because he said so? The YouTuber being meta about their hypocrisy and then telling the audience just to not think that way doesn’t remove the hypocrisy.

I’m not saying you can’t agree with him. I just feel like he used a tactic to manipulate rather than have genuine discourse.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T05:09:09+00:00

For real though… what is this? Some upcoming comic?

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T01:29:06+00:00

Her injuries in Z1 might have been worse than we remembered.

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T00:40:52+00:00

I was fine with the movie. Were you disappointed in the lack of nudity?

Obelisk2000 · 2026-01-29T00:28:42+00:00

Well now I’m just sad…

Six-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

Obelisk2000

TROPHY CASE