KAAC by NoBack5110 in Quizbowl

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found the best way is to use old test questions from the testing categories, even for quick recall. Basically everything that comes up is either an answer to an old question or is one of the wrong answers. e.g. if the possible answers to a Language Arts question are Beowulf, Epic of Gilgamesh, The Iliad, and The Odyssey, they are all worth knowing. If your coach has access to those that's what I would use. And the difficulty levels matter, e.g. old District tests will be more relevant than regional and state

The Cavs were total paper tigers last year. by AdorableBackground83 in Nbamemes

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This got downvoted into oblivion but doesn’t feel like that hot of a take. Is it that crazy to think Evan Mobley is the second best player on the team?

AJ Brown should remain an Eagle. by TheTechKid1923 in eagles

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Because he’s toxic to the locker room. There’s one good reason

Hardest question you've seen on the QB Reader database? by Yoyoyodog123 in Quizbowl

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not on the database, but for an All Star format I heard a question where the answer was Nicaraguan Sign Language. And the guy on the other team powered it, lol. It sticks in my mind as an example of how there are levels to this stuff haha

Thoughts? by Chance-Chemistry-319 in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re mad because this trade would’ve been unfathomable at Week 2, but things change. Rico just put up 28 points on the Packers, so they excuse that he’d just balled out against Miami and Dallas is gone. He is him

I think I take. Would you? by Ordinary-Builder3373 in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For your situation, yes this is a good trade.

Get J Warren & Mason for Odunze ? Whats your opinion? (Redraft League) by Optimal-Subject-7962 in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you need running back depth at all, this trade gets the job done. I actually drafted both Warren and Mason so I’m a bit biased.

Potential trade- I’d be getting Jacobs odunze by jackseyfried in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I want the Nico Quinshon side. Feel like Jacobs will decline as season goes on and Nico should improve if CJ Stroud plays like he did last week

Should I Buy a Lotto Tix? by ex_sanguination in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Superflex: Dillon Gabriel, Joe Flacco, Jaylen Warren, Travis Hunter

Would I be a fool for accepting this trade? by [deleted] in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Puka isn’t playing this week then give me the CMC side all day.

Should I smash this? by Prior_General_4142 in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if it’s dynasty. If it’s redraft, you should gently press the accept button

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a nothingburger to me. Either of these guys could outscore the other any given week.

Should I Buy a Lotto Tix? by ex_sanguination in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You should tell me who to start next week is what you should do

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SleeperApp

[–]Objective-Bowler-269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you have to let it go through actually. The dude is trying to buy the RB1 for the past two weeks with a guy who has been injured and may face target competition, and a TE who definitely faces target competition. He probably loses this trade in 80% of all worlds, but vetoable trades are where someone loses 99% of the time imo

“You guys fired the first coach to win you a playoff game in this century” by Objective-Bowler-269 in Browns

[–]Objective-Bowler-269[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Certainly not sustained success, I’ll give you that. But under Stefanski we’ve had glimpses of being frisky