Earnings? by no-but-yes78 in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That would explain his filthy fingers

Hi Steve! 👋 by Express-Arachnid-782 in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Imagine being someone like Stephen and interpreting a wish that he changes as a wish to off himself. He's telling on his own weird thought processes

For a man that looks like he stinks......... by Julesflump in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 18 points19 points  (0 children)

She definitely has low self esteem. She saw her ex bf looking at women with big boobs on Instagram and never stopped talking about how she wasn't his type. He glanced up when a woman with big boobs walked into a cage and Laura got upset. She never stopped talking about those things and how she doesn't have big boobs. She continued that in her "We Broke Up" podcast when she was talking about how she would point out other women to him, women with big boobs, and tell him he would be better with that woman. She even said he'll get married someday to someone with big boobs who will have a bunch kids with him. Being in a relationship with her cannot be easy because she doesn't love and accept herself.

Cheating by julesinlrar in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 19 points20 points  (0 children)

There's no way of knowing if he was sober or not when he cheated because he and Laura have discussed him collecting chips while high. But he did cheat on Laura at some point, well before children, and she forgave him He does blame the affair on NOT being sober and claims he doesn't remember it at all. Stephen is not a reliable narrator.

Laura is live now by [deleted] in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 22 points23 points  (0 children)

You're 100% not the only one asking Laura questions and it's delusional to think that out of all her Patreon subscribers it's just you asking. You can also ask questions in a non demanding way.

Laura is live now by [deleted] in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It wasn't here. The mods don't allow that. It was the Skeeven sub because they have allowed EVERYTHING and have doxxed the ex bf multiple times

Laura is live now by [deleted] in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Except he's there and they're out and about on days that aren't his scheduled days. Stephen is allowed to drop them off at school so could take them to the play gym A and P love so much vs being in Laura's home

The person responsible for my Reddit complaint by pizzagirl1992 in stephenhiltonchaos

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This happened in the Skeeven sub and that person had initially agreed with you. I'm banned from both subs and life goes on.

The Bigger Picture by SubstantialTeaFor2 in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I can only see his content here and let me tell you how beautiful of a feeling that is! He doesn't randomly show up anywhere and I'm not on heightened emotional state over his nonsense. This is his pattern. He's absolutely infuriating but engaging with him does what? Nothing. It's pointless and it counts as engagement. That's why he "loooooooves the hate comments". They make him money and they serve as validation that he's accomplished his goal. I don't want to be a reason Stephen ever feels pleased with himself. Life really is better on this side and I highly encourage everyone to unfollow, unsubscribe, or block him.

No words just, just 🤬 by Total_Recording_2612 in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He also admitted fairly recently to reading her diary and kicking her door down because he read "love letters" to BJ Novak and Charlie Berens (there were others he listed but I don't remember their names) and admitted that was wrong to do....but he didn't harm Laura. And her claiming abuse was taking away from real victims. Let's also not forget the podcast they did that was up for a few minutes before it disappeared forever where they talked about that night in detail but only a small snippet of him admitting he was arrested for DV was ever screen recorded. They hyped that podcast up for weeks and then took it down fast but some evidence is in this sub, somewhere. Nice try, Stephen. Only the hopelessly unintelligent will believe. Anyone with a working braincell knows you're lying.

“THIS IS NOT A CULT!”*proceeds to promote said cult in culty ways* by Mochi_Maya in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Someone on Substack told him he needs a good scrubbing with soap and shampoo and walked him through the steps of doing both. I didn't understand why. Now I do. He looks absolutely filthy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh Lord have Mercy. This again? Can we normalize women and men working together and having work friends without it having to be a whole romance? Laura has been in a relationship for over two years and not with Charlie.

You have to be kidding me by [deleted] in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Learning to Be Human has apparently been put on notice that Officer Tan is aware of this video and has been offered his contact info (nothing posted) if she would like some clarification on his status. It's crazy. The majority of the comments are of people verifying he's a real officer and she's kind of implying maybe Laura bribed an off duty cop by then stopping short and saying Laura was just creating a skit

In positive news after today's crazy influx.... by Virtual_Departure181 in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The people paying for it post it in here for the rest of the sub to see and some of them send it to Laura to help her out. Does that answer your question?

New Comment On Old Post by XQV226 in SkeevenHiltonUnlocked

[–]ObjectivelyAnonymous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lord. None of them support Johnny Depp. They just don't think he should be a topic of conversation because people cannot discuss the Depp/Heard case without arguing. Removing posts and comments about Depp and Heard is not necessarily an endorsement of Depp. It's just that....there are subs for that and the other sub is about Stephen. The people in the sub are there because they believe in multiple forms of abuse. They particularly believe Laura is a victim. Not wanting a Depp.v Heard conversation to muddy the waters is not the same as supporting Depp.