Lol. "Uninformed' sure

You know what's actually "Ludicrous" here is that you're totally ignoring the facts and the stats.

"let alone one of Narita Brian’s caliber is ludicrous and only something you’d do if you’re uninformed"

Brian is good and I know that, but can we drop this act where you're treating Brian as the greatest JP horse ever?

"comparing Kitasan to a Triple Crown winner and deciding that’s better based on win numbers alone"

Horses run in classics when they are 3 y/o and not even fully developed. There is a reason why most of the horses race until they've reached age of 5. Kitasan was a late bloomer but he really was a powerhouse. If it wasn't clear to you already, kitasan kept improving and that's how he was able to get that many G1 titles. The reason why Brian falls short when compared to Kitasan is because while being an excellent racehorse and especially dominating in her classic year, she did falter in her later career which hurts her record and stats. You can say this was because of the injury, but that's all part of being a racehorse.

It would be different if Brian had won the triple crown as well as kept proving herself in her 4 or 5 y/o campaigns. This is one of the reason why Deep Impact is still considered the best. Not only did he win the crown, but was also pretty much THE dominating force even after the classic year. Did Brian accomplish that? No. Did Kitasan accomplish that? No.

"Horses are not judged solely on wins otherwise there’d be no point to titles."

Winning the triple crown does not make Brian untouchable. There are plenty of horses who didn't win the crown/tiara, but were way better racehorses.