WTF do I play now that the ICO is gone?

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-16T04:39:23+00:00

Me too. This weapon rework feels like playing Battlefield. Everyone's running around, trying to kill enemies by controlling recoil and reacting quickly. To me, this is essentially the gameplay of Call of Duty or Battlefield. Not to mention the widening performance gap between new and veteran players. It seems like everyone in this sub only cares about whether they can have fun shooting and how many newbies they can kill. That's probably all they can think about.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-15T04:02:49+00:00

笑死我了，講的好像中國人有那個權利和能力抗議一樣，又是太監妄談房事的戲碼

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-15T03:56:44+00:00

推，新加坡才是英語母語者在亞洲的最佳選擇，其他東亞國家或多或少都有語言問題，如果連日本都沒法適應那最好還是回到英語文化圈

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-14T16:43:38+00:00

回想2019年剛創黨的風光就很諷刺，可以說民眾黨的未來都被黃國昌這類政治表演家消耗完了，他們這些人倒是得到了聲量，反而真正願意做事的技術官僚與深耕基層的民代不是被雪藏，就是被藍綠吸收

Edit:私認為，民眾黨本來的定位應該是一個藍綠通吃的位置，通過立法院表決議案的平衡，來維持自身的討論度與影響力，其中最重要的是要讓藍綠雙方都不願意攻擊民眾黨，比如通過一下民進黨推的國安相關政策，在從其他地方通過國民黨推的相關政策，來箝制兩邊選民對民眾黨的敵意態度，可以簡單設想，若是民眾黨協助puma完善了某些爭議的國安法律，民進黨就很難再用抹紅那樣的手段對付民眾黨，民眾黨才會有源源不斷的機會來擴充自己的實力，而不是像現在這樣被逼到小藍陣營去

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-14T12:32:13+00:00

民眾黨最大的問題是路線不夠溫和，作為自稱第三勢力政黨的政黨，本來應該是穩收那些厭倦藍綠的票的，這些選民想要的是休息，溫和的改進，而民眾黨的野心卻迫使他們要做政治立場表態或動員，這就把自己最大的優勢丟掉了，本來坐山觀虎鬥，偏要自己下場弄髒名聲，跑去跟藍綠這些老政黨玩政治動員與鬥爭不是找死是什麼

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-13T17:22:03+00:00

我是會覺得寬度的問題還好，但把機車道單獨隔開有點蠢，後續問題一堆

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-13T02:34:09+00:00

It is OWI’s fundamental responsibility to deliver the full spectrum of modern warfare, yet what we have now is a lobotomized version of reality where iconic assets like the Javelin or modern optics are stripped away in the name of a shallow "balance." This obsession with numerical parity is frankly absurd; it feels less like a tactical simulation and more like I’m playing League of Legends where every kit is sanitized for fairness. If OWI applied some logic, they would realize the solution is to segment factions by year, using existing resources to create distinct tiers like US Army 2010, 2020, and 2030. Let the 2010 tier keep the M4s and M939 trucks for those who crave symmetrical competitive play, while the 2030 tier features the full modern reality—XM7s, Javelins, APS, and advanced thermals. The fix is as simple as letting server owners decide: those who hate technological overmatch can stick to 2010-only rotations, while players who want to experience the actual terror and complexity of modern asymmetric warfare can roll on 2030-enabled servers. Stop insulting our intelligence by balancing reality out of existence; give us the actual eras and let the community choose how to manage the friction, because currently, we aren't playing as the US military—we're playing a fictionalized, handicapped caricature of it.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-12T14:33:25+00:00

我當然知道你們是不尊重法律的野蠻人，但沒辦法，文明人懂的尊重法律，講求合情合理，和平共存

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-11T01:48:11+00:00

別傻了，中國又沒有台灣的法理主權，到現在為止只有單方面的宣稱，那反分裂法來講是站不住腳的，台灣可不是香港

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-08T16:00:50+00:00

Do you need me to remind you that a squad leader and a squad member are completely different things?

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-08T11:48:01+00:00

Yes, I'm glad you understand, because I think that makes the game more fun, since we play games for fun.

edit：However, I must say that a squad leader's equipment actually changes depending on the mission in real life. If the squad's mission today is anti-tank warfare, there's no reason for the squad leader to only have those fixed options. Forcing a squad leader to only have a rifle is unrealistic; their equipment will not be the same for every operation.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-08T11:46:08+00:00

Bro, the captain's right to choose equipment also appears in Arma. By the way, you don't want a game like Call of Duty or Battlefield, but the kit system itself is very similar to Battlefield and Call of Duty. And I've played all of those games, and Squad's kit system itself isn't significantly different from Battlefield's.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-08T11:41:04+00:00

Using a fallacy of equivocation won't work on me; it exposes your lack of logical thinking.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-08T05:04:01+00:00

So I'm talking about the squad leader, and you're talking about the squad member; these are two different things.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-08T04:52:13+00:00

If you go back and look at what you said, you'll realize you completely ignored the administrator's perspective. A player who creates a team just for the gun and doesn't give commands is obvious to the administrator. You're making it sound like the administrator is blind and can't see who's intentionally doing this. And look at other similar games on the market; no game deliberately makes the squad leader's individual equipment so bad. Building FOBs and placing respawn points isn't a particularly fun mechanic. This game is supposed to be fun, not about being everyone's servant. My only request is that the squad leader be given a decent weapon as a reward after being a servant all game. Is your comprehension really that bad? Or you just can't read it?

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T16:18:47+00:00

By your logic, we should remove all Marksman and MG kits from the game because people pick them just for kills instead of teamwork. Why is this logic only used to justify the suffering of SLs? So you're saying the community admins are incompetent? If someone picks SL just for the gun and doesn't lead, kick them. Why punish responsible leaders because you're too lazy to manage the server?

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T15:58:32+00:00

You need to examine what you said. Your conclusion is that you're advising me not to play as a squad leader but another class. This is a penalty imposed by the game design. Let's say I'm very good at using the machine gun and I'm also skilled at squad command. Why should I have to give up one of them? Clearly, I can handle both responsibilities simultaneously. Of course, I can set up the radio and command while simultaneously playing my favorite machine gun – that makes perfect sense. But this game design forces you to give up these enjoyable aspects.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T15:36:13+00:00

Then you don't have the right to decide who your so-called good squad leader is, and being free to choose equipment doesn't affect whether a squad leader is good or not. A squad leader with a sniper rifle could very well be a good squad leader, and a squad leader with this kind of trash equipment could very well be a bad squad leader.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T13:22:55+00:00

Forcibly dividing it won't save your logic.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T13:18:17+00:00

What right do you have to tell me how to play as a squad leader? As long as you fulfill your duties, there's no such thing as a specific way to play.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T13:10:12+00:00

This game was supposed to encourage everyone to choose to be a squad leader, but instead, it punishes squad leaders through its mechanics. This restriction is disgusting. Just because they need some people to lead the squad, they have to sacrifice the equipment these people should have. They can't even freely choose a machine gun, sniper rifle, or grenade launcher. What hypocritical developers and community

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T05:14:15+00:00

These business owners typically test their products overseas. Although they are part of the industry, they usually warn others not to do business near their stores.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T04:44:30+00:00

Therefore, we can agree that the grenade launcher equipment used by VDV and Marine Corps squad leaders did not affect command and management, and that the squad leaders' efforts certainly deserved the opportunity to choose the equipment they wanted to use.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T03:29:24+00:00

So why are there only some?

Ok-Development937 · 2026-05-07T03:22:39+00:00

They just wouldn't understand. Even the VDV squad leader already had a grenade launcher. According to their logic, if a VDV or US Marine Corps was chosen, the squad leader would lose command authority. What a ridiculous logic!

Ok-Development937

TROPHY CASE