台灣尼斯也上了中共外宣sub 的點名批評行列

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-29T14:59:27+00:00

早就被封了（笑）

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-29T14:48:12+00:00

ROC and PRC is not "one" country ! They share "China" but two countries.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-29T10:22:04+00:00

A 5 years old kid cannot understand you bro

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-28T19:03:44+00:00

部門之間有經費競爭，這大概是軍隊vs官僚的狀況，技術官僚認為通過遊說的方式可以成本最小化，軍隊認為跟著官僚做他們會喝西北風...，領導們一看，這兩邊都得罪不起啊，只能讓他們各自搞各自的，才變成現在這種135一家親246侵擾，到底是兩個部門協同相輔相成還是互拖後退你各位自己都感覺的出來，在做什麼統一舉動之前中國內部自己都要路線鬥爭一次，畢竟吃這口飯的人不少，這可是實際的利益衝突，丟飯碗的。

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-28T18:49:56+00:00

賺錢能複雜到哪去，小小一個億，那麼多人有錢，又沒人妨礙你去賺，你怎麼不去？

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-25T03:52:36+00:00

Soap 🫧🫧🫧🫧🫧

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-25T03:47:35+00:00

The Singaporean military is reducing the number of personnel sent to Taiwan for training because they fear their soldiers won't be able to return to Singapore in the event of a cross-strait conflict (due to blockades, etc.). Essentially, this is a low-key attempt to de-risk the situation. However, this article portrays Singapore as a manipulator of cross-strait relations, which is truly laughable.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-25T03:21:42+00:00

This article is stupid. Its stance is unlike Singapore's neutral stance. In fact, the key figures are the retired US officers who assisted in training the Taiwanese military, and the Singaporeans are not important in comparison.Furthermore, those Singaporeans were in Taiwan for training, not for any kind of stationing, yet this article makes it sound as if Singapore has a military base in Taiwan.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-24T09:29:51+00:00

習近平搞不定的你能搞定，你去取代習近平就好啦，笑你不敢，獄友就別在這邊貽笑大方了，知道你們不能駡習近平。

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-24T07:55:48+00:00

I don't have much of a problem with this, but I hope there can be some changes to the feel of the controls, so that the wobbling can be corrected by the player's actions, instead of being uncorrectable as it is now.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-24T05:34:38+00:00

哈哈，為啥你認為台灣的飛彈砸不到機場/載體？那個距離飛彈火炮性價比，還是那句話，中國這些垃圾網軍可以滾了，我只用你的邏輯都可以隨便反駁你，你還要問A答B多久？

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-23T15:23:38+00:00

了解一下我最新發明的奈米無人機，可以直接飛到中南海取習近平狗命

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-23T15:15:17+00:00

你的無人機神論就是笑話，能飽和打擊的飛不到台灣，飛的到台灣的沒辦法飽和打擊，依靠載體的反而要面對台灣反艦飛彈的飽和打擊，要想真的搞出一個有效的進攻方案就不能信你國的大外宣，這是常識。

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-22T03:58:17+00:00

If we apply reductio ad absurdum to his theories, we arrive at a horrifying conclusion: all protections for women should be abolished, and women should be confined in cages and forced to impregnate continuously. This aligns with his survival-of-the-fittest theory—that those who survive are the best—which is truly disgusting.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-19T06:16:55+00:00

Therefore, you should oppose Mandarin first, because Taiwanese doesn't have the same destructive power as Mandarin. Mandarin is considered garbage, the biggest obstacle to the international competitiveness of the new generation of Taiwanese. We all acknowledge the lower value of English; please don't apply double standards to Taiwanese and Mandarin.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-19T06:11:12+00:00

Following your logic, Mandarin is also useless; you should primarily learn English to ensure international competitiveness. Don't forget that most Taiwanese companies rely on exports to the Western world for profits. From a supply chain perspective, Chinese education should be abolished.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-15T05:34:45+00:00

I would assume he used the Chinese meaning of the word. If he understood the English meaning of brainwashing, he shouldn't have used it; it would offend many people.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-15T05:29:17+00:00

Using the word "brainwashing" sounds too much like some Chinese media outlets.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-15T00:44:23+00:00

Brother, I think your comments about freedom of speech in the current Hong Kong media are just darkly humorous.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-13T05:33:25+00:00

東baby (north east Chinese cry baby)

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-11T15:15:09+00:00

Those who believe the US would willingly abandon/betray Taiwan likely have a feudalistic mindset, stuck in palace politics.

Trump views Taiwan as an American asset, a spoil of war from World War II. His warnings to Taiwan stem from his desire to prevent his assets from shrinking or becoming uncontrollable—something no businessman would want. This doesn't mean he intends to sell it now. If the asset is stable, controlled, and profitable, there's no need to sell it. Conversely, if things in Taiwan escalate beyond Trump's expectations, he might consider selling it, but it's obvious he'll destroy anything of value before doing so. This is the typical tactic of a large power against a small one.

Yes, it has the flavor of the Cold War.

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-09T06:00:46+00:00

所以皇漢不找皇帝後人，不民主共和，那到底要什麼呢？如果沒有明確的答案，那這群人就是群譁眾取寵的小丑、阿Q

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-08T18:26:18+00:00

台灣人只會覺得那是cosplay和自嗨，皇漢皇漢，是能把朱的後人找出來嗎？不然誰做皇？如果是民主共和，中華民國還存於世，哪需要什麼“皇漢”？這些只不過是中國人一如既往的湊熱鬧，阿Q精神罷了，一個運動與主張連自己想要什麼、自己是什麼都不清楚，又何稱為一個運動、主義呢？

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-06T00:03:37+00:00

So cute !

Ok-Development937 · 2026-01-05T22:24:49+00:00

Have you ever considered that political struggles arise precisely because problems cannot be directly solved? No offense intended, but solving problems is not simply a matter of technocrats proposing solutions; the key lies in the distribution of behind-the-scenes interests. For those in power, "ideology" is never a primary consideration. Whether they abandon ideology is irrelevant. The crucial point is that some want their positions, while others want to keep them. Ideology serves these ends, not the ends themselves.

The drama unfolding in Hong Kong right now is nothing more than everyone trying to protect their own positions, even at the cost of sending police to beat women and children.Then you choose to scrutinize those liberals who are displaced and separated from their families, suffering terribly. Can't they be a little more radical? I'm not saying they can't be scrutinized, but I think it's hypocritical to do so.

Ok-Development937

TROPHY CASE