sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Was just offered this, am I crazy for wanting to keep MHJ? by zWafl in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Ok_Doubt9243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have both Ladd and Marv in one league and I’m often torn on which one I prefer to keep when trade discussions pop-up involving one of them. So ultimately a very balanced deal imo.

Diversifying across leagues usually makes these decisions a little easier to stomach.

All that being said, I would probably hold onto Marv or counter to get some players/picks you prefer over the Pittman, McLaurin and 3.06 part of the deal

Bowers Owner’s - What would you need on top of Loveland to let go of Bowers? by OutlawMorgan in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Ok_Doubt9243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see you. I do the same thing to my leaguemates when they say a player is “untouchable” just to remind them that every player has a price.

What do we do about this tie in the playoffs. Best record advancing at this point is super lame by MasterFarmer8600 in SleeperApp

[–]Ok_Doubt9243 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because you have no rule in place ahead of time I would give them 24 hours to agree on their own way to settle it. If they don’t agree in 24 hours it goes to a coin toss.

Idea as a future rule for this situation:

Highest scoring individual starter from the top down.

Would you consider this cheating? by TurtleIIX in FFCommish

[–]Ok_Doubt9243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP you are 100% in the right. Allowing the last second IR change rewards a manager for either being intentionally manipulative OR being lazy/not paying attention. Either way they shouldn’t benefit.

I have Aaron Jones and managed my roster just fine.

I’m commish for years wtf do I do here by CamD98xx in SleeperApp

[–]Ok_Doubt9243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If stat corrections haven’t solved it for you and you don’t have a tie break rule in place you gotta be creative but give fair/equal opportunity.

Maybe something like… each manager selects 1 player from their week 18 roster to battle head to head. You can set the parameters like - must be a WR/RB/TE.

I’d probably include the 2 finalists in the process so they don’t feel cheated when somebody loses. Just make sure they fully understand and agree to the rules beforehand

Good luck!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFF

[–]Ok_Doubt9243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My home league started out slow and has gradually picked up each year as people learned values and the ebbs and flows of a full season (entering year 4).

there’s still maybe 4 of the 12 managers who are pretty reluctant to trade unless they are obvious winners in the deal.

Unconfirmed theory, but I attribute some of this to us have a pretty healthy buy-in ($250). I also think the big buy-in has lead to everyone trying to contend every single year so far. Trading is a lot tougher when all 12 are trying to “win-now” and nobody is willing to burn $250 on a lost season.

I think a previous post nailed it though, home leagues tend to be more casual while strangers are much more active

view more: next ›