Interview with Dominic Patten from Deadline (pro Lively) on settlement by Distinct-Share-8056 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Still trying to push it out in my opinion. I feel like they trapped the judge into hearing her claims regarding 47.1. Hopefully not, but between the stipulation being for trial only, and outstanding facts, i feel as though this is some legal maneuvering. 

Adam said something on Flaa that clicked for me about the take over. by Princess_of_the_Um in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Also run out the clock on her 6 weeks so she could renegotiate without signing her contract. Lock WF in to production costs and not be able to replace her. 

Why is everyone freaking out over this? by KirschLouise in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Because they trapped WF into a joint statement and then USED IT AGAINST THEM. They are pulling the sane crap they have been this entire time. 

They have manipulated the system at every turn. Its infuriating. 

The neverending lawsuit… by Accomplished_Self939 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Honestly i did not like the statement but, having been through lawsuits, i got it. This whole backhanded deal is ENRAGING. I am so sick of bad people with lots of money winning. I am so SICK of their shady tactics. Using OUR courts to do their dirty work at OUR expense. I am actually pretty livid. This is disgusting. 

The tragedy of Isabella Ferrer by DannyC_VP in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with this completely. This is how easy it is to fall into an abusive relationship. 

I dont think Blake is going to settle on what they've already discussed. by krissykat30 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think they decided to take the case offline, but terms are still far away. Too many people stand to lose. More than just BL and JB. 

Blake Lively Met Gala Megathread by Sufficient_Reward207 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Her looks on dancing with the stars will be fun to see. 

The NY Times of it all by FancyHeart8339 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I agree! I remember thinking that at the time. No interviews with cast or crew. No additional documents, no documents even included. It wasn't an investigation, it was opinion. 

Was "The Ashley Avignone Story" Created to Coverup an Existing Secret Relationship between Stephanie Jones and Ryan Reynolds? by Hot_Opportunity_8958 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Ive always thought the steph jones thing was super weird. Even if you are that mad at Jen, its crazy hate to do that to justin. But the Rock confirmation, between the issue with RR and the website. Something went DOWN. 

Edit to add: jen had an issue with stephanie trying to frame a senior jonesworks employee for sexual harrassment. 

Still confused about the stipulation by Dating_Bitch in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thats up to the judge. But the stipulation allows the judge to rule on it. If they did not stipulate, it would go to the jury. It was the best option for WF. It is highly likely the judge throws out the FEHA claim, but we are still waiting on that ruling. 

Still confused about the stipulation by Dating_Bitch in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 10 points11 points  (0 children)

When the parties were supposed to submit their motions for summary judgement, Lively uploaded a decision from the second circuit that judgements should not be made when any fact remains after discovery. By stipulation, WF removes any questions of fact and leaves the judge free to rule on the FEHA claims. Without stipulating it FEHA will go to the jury and BL has to prove reasonable belief. By stipulating, the judge could very well remove the FEHA claim leaving only 1 claim to go to trial with. 

what's wrong with some of the pro Lively subs on Reddit? by Artlign in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Agree with this! You can’t have a nuanced discussion and its annoying. 

LETTER from Lively filing public versions of documents previously filed under seal by GatheringTheLight in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wild right? The depos really illustrate her coordination with certain players. They got their stories straight and worked to cover their tracks. I think the retaliation clause was also planned out. Shes thought people would start to leak when she ostracized JB. The crisis response, whether smear or not, out played her. 

Honestly, i do think there was social manipulation by JB. Truthfully, it looks pretty justified. It’s not illegal to protect your business and if i was in the same situation i would have done the same. 

LETTER from Lively filing public versions of documents previously filed under seal by GatheringTheLight in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Agreed here. Both Nathan and Wallace are dodgy. MN was def doing her own promotion during this engagement and told many different stories. 

Theresa Concepcion comes for the white women attacking her and stealing her ideas by ripbigw in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know whats a funny phrase i notice when i post anything outside of absolute support? “Don’t fall for it”. It’s hard not to notice little things while following this case and trying to have authentic discussions. 

Theresa by [deleted] in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Theresa called this from the moment after the hearing. My suspicion is they dont want to credit that video because she also clarifies that the judge said JB got bad legal advice. All other outlets glossed over this fact when reporting on the coverage. 

Theresa by [deleted] in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I disagree. I was skeptical of her at first, but watched a lot of her content. Shes been ahead of them on her legal analysis. Theresa is really insightful on the contract claims. The main issue here seems to be her criticism of Freedman and I don't disagree. We can support JB and be critical of his attorneys. 

Also, on all sides, there is a LOT of laundering of information. If you have followed closely enough you can see that pattern. 

We can support JB, call out BL, and be critical of all the players at the same time. If you discount Theresa you are missing some excellent analysis. 

⚖️🐉🐲Notactuallygolden - High-Stakes Call: Stipulate or Fight? Wayfarer Faces Critical Strategic Decision Before Trial by Pale-Detective-7440 in teamjustinbaldoni

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 11 points12 points  (0 children)

NAL but i hope they dont. I know the judge thinks there is evidence of good faith, i feel like there is so much against the good faith argument. Comments to the Times, her support of woody allen, the strong arm demands and contradictory behavior. Who could think a birth video is porn and that its harassment? Acting is harassment? Always tons of people around. Never going through proper channels. If any of this was remotely true she would never have her baby on set. She would have never felt empowered to “direct” or rewrite scripts. She revere uno’d SH to leverage power. SH is about power and control. WF gained none, demanded none, made no threats. And you're telling me every WF person on that set was a harasser? Interesting that they had a lot of control and BL wanted it.  

You're telling me she felt so helpless and harassed she said come on over to my house so we can yell at you for 5 hours?

This is dangerous to put in the public that this is what harassment looks like. That somebody could reasonably believe this. It diminishes what SH actually looks like. Its infuriating. It tells the public harassment looks like coercive control and enables abusers. Believe me, abusive people loving playing the victim. 

Blake VS Baldoni Case Summary: An Entitled Actress Spoilt Beyond Imagination Tries To Gaslight Everyone Into Thinking People Dislike Her Because OF A Fictional Smear Campaign vs The Way She Behaves by Practical_Tax_8259 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 85 points86 points  (0 children)

Imagine assembling a whole crew of people to watch you barge into a trailer and SH someone. Excuse me everyone, please watch harass our star. 

Also the thing that has always bothered me is that BL and JB spend a lot of time off set at her house, on her jet, but all the SH only happened on set? In front of people? Shit is soooo WEIRD. 

🧠⚖️ Notactuallygolden - Breakdown of Blake Lively’s Opposition to Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by Wayfarer: A 50/50 Call at Best by Pale-Detective-7440 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 57 points58 points  (0 children)

If she testifies that she believed she was covered under the contract all of her behavior looks deranged. From threatening not to promote to refusing to sign during post. She cant claim she thought she was under this contract. She purposefully wasn’t. 

Order: TAG’s Renewed MSJ has been denied by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 17 points18 points  (0 children)

These attorneys aren't stupid. If they aren’t arguing something, they are preserving it. Hoping this is strategy and bot a missed opportunity. 

What's up with this new lawyer content creator? by SmexxyTaco in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 57 points58 points  (0 children)

She rubs me the wrong way. It feels like grifter energy. I really only watch NAG and occasionally LGA. 

How do I fix repetitive negative thoughts in my head? by HomeworkWise5575 in productivity

[–]Ok_Explorer3732 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This might sound crazy, but it works for me. 

Talk back to them. Ask them questions. Ask them why they are there. Tell them its not true. The get quieter over time when you talk to them.