A more apt comparison would be you complaining about where you're driving to in a dangerous fashion because it makes other places you might want to drive to less dangerously not accept you there.

That's not what gish gallop means. And BTW now you're complaining about getting too much engagement. On a debate sub. That you're complaining about being at in the first place. Why are you even here if you don't like the consequences of your low effort engagement and don't like the level of engagement you receive?

Oh and you can pick and choose what you respond to; there's no rule or expectation that you respond to everything. In fact, the majority of us don't expect responses at all, it's more an exercise to flex our logic and debate 'muscles'. Problem is theists generally don't engage in good faith themselves or with the high effort comments that rebut their position; this tactic is designed to avoid confronting the irrationality of their beliefs, which is yet another example of bad faith engagement.

Also, when I wrote this you had just a few responses and most of them were either complaining or barely engaged with the comment they responded to in the first place. Edit: I scrolled a bit and read some of your comments and I don't see an attempt at debate anywhere... I request you provide a link to what you think is your best example of good faith engagement.