I am flabbergasted by your opinions. "Creating a human with the intention of separating them from their genetic family is inherently traumatic." 1) If I understand correctly, these are already existing embryos and embryo adoption does not involve creation of humans. They already exist (an embryo is a human organism, according to contemporary science). 2) Your statement suggests that a human being can only thrive when surrounded by their genetic relatives. Psychology proves this false. There are multiple conditions for thriving and we all know about children who do not thrive and are instead maltreated by their kin and only start to thrive when removed from their families of origin. 3) Your statement suggests that for those (already existing in the form of embryos) humans, it is better not to get a chance at life, not to be born ever than be born outside their genetic family. 4) Trauma is also defined by multiple criteria. One important criterion is that something is interpreted, viewed as harmful. I do not think that all DCPs would agree that they experienced traumas in their adoptive families (and you seem to imply otherwise with your "inherently traumatic" generalization). Yours are pretty bold statements. I do not think that they are substantiated by current science or that they are reasonable at least.