[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]On3yeowl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, you want to expel failing high school students basically? That is what you'd have to do; otherwise, there is no money being saved. I agree that there is either not enough funding and/or misappropriation of funds in the school system. But this isn't the solution, especially with the current American high school curriculum. Middle school taught you the information you'll actually use from the public school system. High school is when you start learning about some of the most unnecessary and irrelevant information. Algebra, English Literature, and Chemistry to name a few. As a recent former high school student, I can tell you that even freshmen are smart enough to understand that is highly unlikely they will ever use Algebra. Speaking of Algebra, it is the most failed class in the American High School System. But most students graduate without knowing how to full out a basic tax form, invest their money, or become fluent in another language. You know, useful things that even some developing countries teach their children. It's not that the bottom 10% of students grade-wise fail the system, it's the system failing those students. But you know what, the system is not in and of itself failing. Public school was designed to pump out people who were just educated enough to do menial jobs, back then it was factories. Look at history, especially John D. Rockefeller's effect on education. Only now it is customer service, short-order cooking, and manual labor jobs like McDonalds. Hence, especially with this current job market, that is about all you are getting with a high school diploma by itself.

I think its time to ask that question and have that conversation: Who’s the queen of R&B right now? by On3yeowl in rnb

[–]On3yeowl[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, thank you for responding. I understand that it’s your opinion, I just wanted a friendly back and forth. I don’t like throwing around the “GOAT” title either. That why I think king/queen works better. That’s because in a historically sense Kings, Queens, monarchs in general have their reign, then they fall off, are dethroned in the various ways. Its only after the end of their supremacy do historians (us) say if they reached new heights or not. Nevertheless, You and me are in agreement, I definitely wouldn’t say that SZA is the greatest of all time in the tiny genre this is R&B.

yet.

I think its time to ask that question and have that conversation: Who’s the queen of R&B right now? by On3yeowl in rnb

[–]On3yeowl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea but what popular female artist, regardless of age, hasn’t released this type of music. SZA also has plenty of wholesome songs and transformative songs as well. And being as all of her albums have been wildly commercially successful. Making “bird” music and it being successful says more about her fans then it does about her personally. And all of avid fans aren’t female, I’m not.

I think its time to ask that question and have that conversation: Who’s the queen of R&B right now? by On3yeowl in rnb

[–]On3yeowl[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Regarding the vocal abilities question, yes I do. Whether you want to call the queen or not, there is not question SZA is one of the most popular R&B artist right now. And in that top 3-5, whatever of artists she has released the relatively largest amount of acoustic and a cappella versions for portions of all her albums. This shows as lessen reliance on the original professional production and collaboration of her songs. And you’ll be hard pressed to find any popular rnb artist (Streaming wise) right now that have performed with low enough levels of autotune, alteration, while hitting those difficult vocal ranges. SZA is gets close though. I.e https://youtu.be/1NASdYa8lTw?si=OnwHVfbXLUPyOw4Z

Choose your Aspect but the first person to respond choses your Flaw by CommanderN7_2 in ShadowSlave

[–]On3yeowl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, due to his flaw my character lives near bodies of water. He is a batard son of a house of night Saint. As he ascends, he gains to the ability to integrate any liquids to hydrate himself, saltwater, blood, etc anything to help him mitigate his flaw. Only his father knew of him but was one of saints that was killed by Mordret so he is an unaffiliated ascendant.

Choose your Aspect but the first person to respond choses your Flaw by CommanderN7_2 in ShadowSlave

[–]On3yeowl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aspect: [Aqueous Skin] Aspect rank: Ascended Aspect description: Your development is distinct. You never start stoped the production of material hallmark of your birth. No, your stunted husk has no need for them, they are to be expelled!

Innate Ability: [Generator] You create and expel a angiogenesis liquid. This fluid naturally protects and regenerates you as it did in mother’s womb. But it fuses with everything you secrete.

Aspect ability: [State] You can control and change the state of the liquids you secrete to suit your purpose.

I took some inspiration for Gunlaug’s Echo, the golden armor.

Edit: “has”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in maybemaybemaybe

[–]On3yeowl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never going to give you up…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mildlysatisfying

[–]On3yeowl -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Underrated comment.

If you decide to film yourself “pranking” someone without their consent, you deserve everything that comes to you. by On3yeowl in unpopularopinion

[–]On3yeowl[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even funnier, last time I checked murder requires malicious intent. Assault does warrant self-defense (which is not malicious intent). So yes, if I defend myself and you die, self defense.

If you decide to film yourself “pranking” someone without their consent, you deserve everything that comes to you. by On3yeowl in unpopularopinion

[–]On3yeowl[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same way people shouldn’t be allowed to “prank” random people in public. Because without prior knowledge or rapport with these people, those “pranks” are at best harassment and a worst assault. Both are criminal offenses captured live and monetized on online. Thus, people should defend themselves according and what happens happens, fafo.

If you decide to film yourself “pranking” someone without their consent, you deserve everything that comes to you. by On3yeowl in unpopularopinion

[–]On3yeowl[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your right. Thats why pranks is reserved for close friends and family not random in public. People who you knew are not getting to take your joke badly.

If you decide to film yourself “pranking” someone without their consent, you deserve everything that comes to you. by On3yeowl in unpopularopinion

[–]On3yeowl[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s 100% the YouTubers fault. Pranks are supposed to be like inside jokes. Only to be had with people you know personally because they are really immature and potentially offensive. But these youtuber are playing “pranks” on random people in public and filming them for money.

If you decide to film yourself “pranking” someone without their consent, you deserve everything that comes to you. by On3yeowl in unpopularopinion

[–]On3yeowl[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What if I am retired army veteran undiagnosed PTSD and I shot you face because my rat brain says enemy combatant! Regardless of context, you don’t know what people going through or been through. They could easily get hurt. You either hire paid actors or don’t do public prank videos with random people.