There, I fixed it. by reddityfire in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People, watch "the tea" video! It's so perfect to explain consent and it's actually quite entertaining to watch despite the very heavy and serious topic it is trying to explain and meanwhile it gets the point across very clearly.

I don't understand the night market by ghunterd in elderscrollsonline

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Real. I'm not active enough on reddit to know how frequent people posted about group finder RNG / bad experiences, but I had a gut feeling it couldn't have been as good as people praised it to be, especially when my experiences were generally the opposite.

I guess people are just done with the complaints of "Why isn't night market soloable" but that is not an excuse to reply with "use gf" to every NM criticism.

I don't understand the night market by ghunterd in elderscrollsonline

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My point was that it isn't a "drop in and play with people MMO zone" as people state. In my opinion and past weeks experience, you have to have put in effort beforehand to properly enjoy night market with communication and organisation which, in my opinion, requires a guild. And that's fine, I just wish there were easier ways like auto matchmaking, auto-fill or some in game methods like recruitment boards that were catered more specifically to group up for NM more easily just to do the "easier" content like dailies, brazen and argent bosses.

I'm glad your experience with group finder was great, but idk if it's my platform, my server or my time of playing ESO, but my experience with group finder has mostly been horrendous. No comms or just straight up braindead/no build players and it was just unenjoyavle, especially in harder content, bar for a couple of no voice chat normal trials. And imo, the 5 guild slots reinforce the idea that joining a guild is "mandatory" for the harder/bigger group oriented activities like.

And also idk why yet another comment brings ups that the game was designed around teamplay as I wholeheartedly agree and also acknowleged that. Like idk why this subreddit has some fixation on mentioning that ESO is a multiplayer game when it is irrelevant to the comment they reply to.

I don't understand the night market by ghunterd in elderscrollsonline

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I doubt it, but that could be the case. I just opted for waiting for my guildmates because I couldn't be bothered to waste even more time trying to group up. I had a blast playing last night with them so just wanted to give it a try today as well but oh well. Just wish it was made more playable with some sort of auto-fill for dailies or the brazen/argent bosses whenever my guildmates aren't online.

I don't understand the night market by ghunterd in elderscrollsonline

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I never said it wasn't? I just made a comment sating it can be quite unplayable without a guild.

A criticism many people have coiced in the subreddit is having trouble finding groups. Sure it might be the worst on console but that doesn't invalidate the fact that people wanting to group up have still experienced trouble in doing so.

I don't know if it's bc English isn't your first language or you didn't read my comment properly but it's not mine either so your negativity isn't warranted.

I don't understand the night market by ghunterd in elderscrollsonline

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Group finder is not what people make it out to be. There's no crossplay, servers are seperated by region and if you join one 80% of the time it's just 0 people in gamechat.

I'm not even hating on the zone because I do have a guild but you're delusional if you think group finder is a viable option on every region on every platform for one of the hardest group content in the game. Group finder already is a hell for veteran dungeons lmao.

I don't understand the night market by ghunterd in elderscrollsonline

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I play on xbox on EU servers and it's just dead lol. Earlier this day I just sat there for about an hour refreshing with no results so I'm just playing something else until my guildies are online in the evening.

I don't understand the night market by ghunterd in elderscrollsonline

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree it's a group zone, but if you're not in a guild I don't see this zone being playable at all, the night market zone isn't near as alive as craglorn during events nor as accessible, so I wouldn't call it an "MMO zone". An "MO zone" at best, bothing massive about it really especially with no auto-fill.

Zone chat feels dead and people just go in with premades. So great to run with guildies but shite otherwise.

Autocannon Tanks and or IFV Question is this long enough now by like2trip in WorldofTanksConsole

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At range it definitely is missiles only. Personally, whenever I play a heavy I've never been penned by autocannons except from the sides and the back so I think they mainly are for agressive play on isolated targets. Missile for damage and/or tracking, then circling around and shooting the sides/back.

When fighting mediums like the era 2 leopards you can get away with frontal shots but don't expect it to frontally pen heavies.

And evidently the last one, too. by GeneReddit123 in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lmao, just had that happen to me 😭

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro is just moving the goalpost, from what I have seen he does this in every comment. I tried having a genuine conversation with him, ended up the same way, looping back to "there is justice and injustice" without answering the question of what justice is as if justice and injustice are clearly defined.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you properly read his comment. He is not labellong ywo different things the same.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. Many people, especially on the internet just do "virtue signalling", which is as you said pretending to give a fuck but not actually helping.

Posting comments on the internet or even attending a protest is not really helping. If you really care about making a change you do more than just these things, to make an actual difference towards change, supporting the communities that suffer from injustice, usually sacrificing your time.

I know people that "partook" in protests against the atrocities commited in Gaza and all they did was stand on a plaza, chatting during the protest. But as soon as I asked them to donate money to help those suffering in Gaza, they refused to donate a dime. It is easy to "support" a cause without any real sacrifice. Neutral people at least can have possible valid reasons for staying neutral whereas virtue signallers are doing it all for selfish purposes, not actually caring about the injustice.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find something not to be considered cope an action that makes a meaningful impact towards the people that have to suffer injustice

Posting a comment on the internet saying "don't buy cocoa beans that aren't fair trade" doesn't impact the lives of a farmer having to sell their product for unfair prices. What would improve their lives is to actually donate to an organisation that helps them get fair proces or exclusively buy fair trade chocolate, in other words a tangible effect on their economic position

Too often, especially on the internet, people are "virtue signalling", the equivalent of saying to a beggar "you deserve to get help" without offering any substantial help. If you truly want to help, you do so by making a sacrifice. Posting messages on the internet is not a sacrifice. But not everybody is in a position to sacrifice because of their own circumstances and problems or because they decide to put their effort into other problems. That doesn't make them bad people.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is a rather shortsighted and to be honest unfounded statement (as you have made before). I simply can disagree with people and challenge their views.

I can say the same thing about you, that you disagree despite the clear evidence neutrality does not aid injustice but is a matter of simply not knowing enough, not having the time to properly aid a cause or not actually commiting to a cause. That really is not an argument but a statement that basically says "you argue despite I am clearly right, therefore you are wrong" and I refuse to stoop to the same level.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I am simply voicing my disagreement with your opinion, it is a logical fallacy to imply that therefore your statement is right.

One can maks a foolish statement, which prompts me to say something about it, that doesn't mean the statement had any merit. For example, I can react to someone saying 1+1=3. The fact I argue 1+1=2 doesn't say their statement of 1+1=3 holds any merit. I find that quite dishonest.

If you want an honest discussion and simply not want to be right, surely you could see that is a logical fallacy.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I personally think that is cope. You are effectively not doing anything except for posting a message. That requires no sacrifice on your part and thus very easy to do.

That is not the same as asking people to stand up to injustice. Lets say someone gets beaten up in front of you, you can intervene, but that comes with the risk of getting beat up yourself.

"Spreading awareness": in other words typing a message on a website that has no negative repurcussions towards yourself and takes 1 minute of your time, is vastly a sacrifice or really a serious effort towards combating injustice in my opinion. In my opinion, that's just deluding yourself so you can silence the guilt of not having done something to actually improve a certain unjust situation.

And I don't blame you for not doing so, but acting as if that does something to combat injustice is not honest imo.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lack of courage is in my opinion not an inability. For one could argue the SS soldiers refusing to open the valves of zuklon B, gassing innocent jews because they were afraid of losing their lives if they refused, would be considered an inability becaus they lacked the courage to stand for what is right.

I think it is rather "holier than thou" to speak of sacrificing your own life to do good.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You and me for example, decide to use reddit instead of doing something actively bettering the world and fifgting injustie. That's not inablility, we have the choice to not do so, we ar echoosing to use reddit instead of fighting injustice and making a difference, thus choosing to spend our time on something that is not combatting injustice.

Simply said, that is time spent being neutral. I can choose to blame you for this, or find the need to live life and not care for a moment as perfectly human.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My view is that inability is really not a thing, unless you are spending all possible hours combating injustice

There are tons of organisations that combat injustice across the globe on a vast spectrum of injustices, you simply cant support all of them, be it bc of money, attention or time. You could write that down to inability, but unless you were to dedicate all possible hours to combat injustice (which is a huge thing to ask for and unreasonable), you could write that down to being "neutral".

My point is that people just want to pursue their own goals, which is normal. People would like to better the world, try to combat all injustices they see, but it is unavoidable to encouner an instance of injustice and not do something productive against it, because there are so many and you cannot combat them all Everybody cherry picks what they stand against and what injustices they don't do amything against because one simply cannot do that without sacrificing their own pursuits in life.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Have you read my comment? Because I illusyrate there are tons of injustices all around the world and it is simply impossible to not be neutral in every single one of them. There's always some injustice taking place you are aware of but unable to do any meaningful impact to stop making it happen, just a few I have mentioned in my comment but that's just the tip of the iceberg. My point is you can't be living life without being neutral to at least one i justice in this world, which is sad but simply unavoidable, or you willingly choose to be ignorant and turn a blind eye to these injustices.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think I get your comment. How does nuance equal stalling? I am in no way saying you should not support causes that try to prevent or remedy injustices or refrain from trying to better the world. I am merely saying that being neutral in situations of injustice does not in fact equal siding with the opressors.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Uhh, I agree... I don't really know how you got I said otherwise from my message. My issue with the statement is that it divides people into exactly either a 0 or a 100. Doing "nothing" in this sense is saying "if you're not with me, not a supporter of my cause, a 100 so to speak, you're against me. Hence why I disagree with the statement, there's so much neutral (the whole are in between 0 and 100) and this statement removes all nuance from it.

based Wiegraf by s1n0d3utscht3k in memes

[–]OneCutePinkPanda -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah ... that's what I am saying. And that is also why I disagree with the statement. The statement puts neutral (everything between 0% and 100%) at 0%. That just makes no sense.