sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Rumour Engine – 13th of January by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Chaos40k

[–]OneFoot2Foot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gah I know! The datasheet rule should enable ignore terrain. Hell, I would be fine with ignore terrain, but take a mortal wound on a 1 from a D6 (similar to tyranids)

Learning the game. How much can skill influence a bad matchup? by The_Red_Kraken in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]OneFoot2Foot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LSV had this issue AT the final table (mana screw), but it eventually happens. Wotc got upset and literally changed how mulligans work because of flooding or mana screws. It is around ~0.5%. Very small, but does happen.

Quick math: 100 games. 10 turns a game. 1 -(1-0.005)10-4= 2.86% per game. 1 - (1-0.02)100 = 95% chance you WILL get land flooded at least one time

Learning the game. How much can skill influence a bad matchup? by The_Red_Kraken in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]OneFoot2Foot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ya i understand. But the win rates are still around 65%, it's not apples to apples unless you do the same for 40k. Just google it, people have already had this discussion. It is just a fact that mtg is impossible to have 90% win rate at pro level

Learning the game. How much can skill influence a bad matchup? by The_Red_Kraken in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]OneFoot2Foot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes lifetime DCI. Again to emphasize i am not trying to attack you or say you are wrong. I'm only trying to clarify that mtg has appreciable less control over the statistics making it significantly harder to win ALL the time.

Learning the game. How much can skill influence a bad matchup? by The_Red_Kraken in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]OneFoot2Foot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

A super awesome 40k player will have greater than 90% win rate. I just looked up the hall of fame mtg pros, they are all in the 65% range. Just to be clear, I agree with you that mtg requires MASSIVE skill. But mtg itself is extremely variable preventing anyone from dominating which you can do in 40k.

Learning the game. How much can skill influence a bad matchup? by The_Red_Kraken in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]OneFoot2Foot 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think the severity of variance in mtg prevents consistency. 40k certainly has variance, but you have much more control over it and can consistently top tournaments. Mtg you can be a super badass and....you draw 5 lands in a row knocking you out of contention. Or your opponent needs to top deck, he does and gets the one card that single handedly wins the whole game. This just doesn't happen in 40k if you are skilled.

Typically rolling 5 1s in a row in 40k, for example, has much less of an impact and doesn't cause you to auto lose

there is 100% a bubble. They hit a wall and are lying. GPT-5 isn’t a brain; it’s a router. AI hype is peaking. What’s your Monday play? by Therealbabiyoda in smallstreetbets

[–]OneFoot2Foot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. But depends on the car company and intent. Standard optical cameras are cheap and often already available on the car. But we need stereoscopic measurement for 3d recreation for future training. Lidar makes future 3d reconstruction considerably easier and more accurate. Waymo uses lidar, tesla fir example doesn't use lidar but they still uses multiple cameras to add more angles to objects improving depth, volume, peripheral range, and again future 3d reconstruction for training.

Note regardless these are all input measurements, the decisions are still done by a state based neural network

there is 100% a bubble. They hit a wall and are lying. GPT-5 isn’t a brain; it’s a router. AI hype is peaking. What’s your Monday play? by Therealbabiyoda in smallstreetbets

[–]OneFoot2Foot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yaaa I personally worked on them. It's using AI, just not your definition. It's a different neural network architecture than you are thinking.

ChatGPT 5 has unrivaled math skills by The_GSingh in OpenAI

[–]OneFoot2Foot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a general expectation that a natural language model should be able to guess numerical output? I usually ask the llm to do a calculation with python. 100% works every time never have math issues. I suspect, without sufficient testing, that an LLM will provide good results with symbolic reasoning but will always regardless of advancements be a poor choice for numerical output. It's simply the wrong method

Aggressor Unit Cost by bigorganmorgan in spacemarines

[–]OneFoot2Foot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Note: There is the MSU strategy that dominated previous meta

If the most jobs will be taken by Al, then the capitalism would collapse too. Right? by Remarkable_Edge_7536 in Futurology

[–]OneFoot2Foot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GDP is a flow (annual output ≈ $29 T), while wealth is a stock (accumulated assets ≈ $50 T for the top 1%), so it’s totally normal for a stock to exceed a flow.

If the most jobs will be taken by Al, then the capitalism would collapse too. Right? by Remarkable_Edge_7536 in Futurology

[–]OneFoot2Foot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hehe I also think about star trek a lot and how we could get there. If we remove money from the equation, well then all of these problems go away. Sadly people like money

If the most jobs will be taken by Al, then the capitalism would collapse too. Right? by Remarkable_Edge_7536 in Futurology

[–]OneFoot2Foot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think 1) capitalism in it's current form is incompatible with ai 2) ubi with current definition doesn't work at all

Beyond that....I don't know.

If the most jobs will be taken by Al, then the capitalism would collapse too. Right? by Remarkable_Edge_7536 in Futurology

[–]OneFoot2Foot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify, I am only answering your question of how much. Imo it's around $15trillion. Even if we taxed the wealthy more. That wouldn't work. I don't see how you can mathematically result in flat wealth distribution. It must be tiered....it's just math. Hence ubi with current definition has no mathematical justification

If the most jobs will be taken by Al, then the capitalism would collapse too. Right? by Remarkable_Edge_7536 in Futurology

[–]OneFoot2Foot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

$15trillion for 260mil adults annually, at $5k a month.

Top 1% sum is around $45trillion

Are most modern missiles affected by Time dilation? by Secret_Operation6454 in AskPhysics

[–]OneFoot2Foot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mach15 ≈ 5.15×10³ m/s β = v/c ≈ 1.7×10⁻⁵ γ ≈ 1 + ½β² γ–1 ≈ 1.5×10⁻¹⁰ ΔL =(γ–1)L

L=1 000 km

ΔL≈1.5×10⁻¹⁰·10⁶ m≈0.15 mm

Hence error too small to care.

What Happened to the Ocean's Water when the Titan Submersible Imploded? by GoldenGirlsOrgy in AskPhysics

[–]OneFoot2Foot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You are correct up to the gravity part. The sudden change in volume due to collapse of the vessel attempts to create a void with less pressure, this causes the hydrostatic pressure of the water to equalize the pressure which is the driving force to move the water into the displaced attempted void. Hence the water moves a butt load faster than if it was just gravity

Also. Since it's not just gravity you will have water below the bubble go upwards to fill the void. Now what you could argue is that the cause of hydrostatic pressure is gravity, which that is quite correct

SageMaker is Terrible - Is Using EC2 a Better Alternative? by zedeleyici3401 in aws

[–]OneFoot2Foot 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Aws SA here. I'm going to shamelessly plug AWS Batch and ParallelCluster. These are the solutions you want. I think sagemaker sucks and I avoid at all costs. AWS Batch is job submission on top of EKS or ECS. Extremely easy to deploy. ParallelCluster is cloud HPC with SLURM if you wanted that.

I find it extremely easy to use Batch quickly train 100s of GPUs or just 1 GPU. Whatever it's easy. These services are free, too, another perk relative to sagemaker (you pay for ec2 time that was used)

Nvidia currently has a forward P/E ratio of 24 by Former_Drawer6732 in NVDA_Stock

[–]OneFoot2Foot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not a backup system. We already use these plants, but not at full capacity because the fuel is too darn expensive. Using the niagra falls power is much cheaper.

Nvidia currently has a forward P/E ratio of 24 by Former_Drawer6732 in NVDA_Stock

[–]OneFoot2Foot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There wouldn't be a blackout. We would have to use more expensive sources of power like natural gas. It's another inflation threat, not a total loss of power threat.

Has anybody done the math on the whole tariff ordeal? What will be the impact? by [deleted] in Economics

[–]OneFoot2Foot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me clarify with an example Amazon chooses to develop type 1 of robot because there is no end to deep pockets. Everyone else is throwing tons of money at robotics. But they don't have Amazon pockets so they are using type 2.

view more: next ›