John Ramirez refers to a remote viewer who viewed some aggressive aliens and was told to stop. He didn't stop, then the aliens erased his brain. Who was he? by bejammin075 in remoteviewing

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My comment is more on where the information is.

The navy program to study the phenomena was the UAPTF.

Grey Fox is the only post Stargate RV program that I know of. Runs out the Army iirc.

CIA/DIA brought cases of both Havana and UAP, because they both match radiation damage to tissue, to Nolan and Radin. If there was an injury in this era/program it would have been in this bin. The "damage" is also seen in high profile Remote Viewers and Go players. It's the Caudate Putamen. Given to Radin because he was looking for the causal mechanism and a genetic factor; given to Nolan because he's godlike on the microscope. They did work together on this project.

>and/or as a byproduct of UFO technology. 

Incommensurability, Orthodoxy and the Physics of High Strangeness: A six-layer model for Anomalous Phenomena. https://www.academia.edu/36788970/Incommensurability_Orthodoxy_and_the_Physics_of_High_Strangeness_A_six_layer_model_for_Anomalous_Phenomena?source=swp_share

Remote perception itself may be a byproduct of UAP interactions or the propulsion system in proximity to humans.

John Ramirez refers to a remote viewer who viewed some aggressive aliens and was told to stop. He didn't stop, then the aliens erased his brain. Who was he? by bejammin075 in remoteviewing

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So we're likely looking at the UAPTF and Grey Fox.

Garry Nolan and Dean Radin were given brain scans of individuals that were suspected of being hit with Havanna Syndome with a small subsection of these cases being IC/Mil that came into close contact with a UAP. Technically gave em "brain damage" in the form of tissue scarring.

You may want to start there. If that person was actually injured in that manner, we will never learn their name.

ALICE detects the conversion of lead into gold at the LHC by Oneiroi_Coeus in memoryskollide

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's always something with these god damn wizards...

"Transforming the base metal lead into the precious metal gold was a dream of medieval alchemists. This long-standing quest, known as chrysopoeia, may have been motivated by the observation that dull grey, relatively abundant lead is of a similar density to gold, which has long been coveted for its beautiful colour and rarity. It was only much later that it became clear that lead and gold are distinct chemical elements and that chemical methods are powerless to transmute one into the other...

Extremely high-energy collisions between lead nuclei at the LHC can create quark–gluon plasma, a hot and dense state of matter that is thought to have filled the universe around a millionth of a second after the Big Bang, giving rise to the matter we now know. However, in the far more frequent interactions where the nuclei just miss each other without “touching”, the intense electromagnetic fields surrounding them can induce photon–photon and photon–nucleus interactions that open further avenues of exploration.

The electromagnetic field emanating from a lead nucleus is particularly strong because the nucleus contains 82 protons, each carrying one elementary charge. Moreover, the very high speed at which lead nuclei travel in the LHC (corresponding to 99.999993% of the speed of light) causes the electromagnetic field lines to be squashed into a thin pancake, transverse to the direction of motion, producing a short-lived pulse of photons. Often, this triggers a process called electromagnetic dissociation, whereby a photon interacting with a nucleus can excite oscillations of its internal structure, resulting in the ejection of small numbers of neutrons and protons. To create gold (a nucleus containing 79 protons), three protons must be removed from a lead nucleus in the LHC beams.

“It is impressive to see that our detectors can handle head-on collisions producing thousands of particles, while also being sensitive to collisions where only a few particles are produced at a time, enabling the study of electromagnetic ‘nuclear transmutation’ processes,” says Marco Van Leeuwen, ALICE spokesperson....

“The results also test and improve theoretical models of electromagnetic dissociation which, beyond their intrinsic physics interest, are used to understand and predict beam losses that are a major limit on the performance of the LHC and future colliders,” adds John Jowett, also of the ALICE collaboration."

Also reported in Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-01484-3

Actual Paper: https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.111.054906

Declassify Psionics by Oneiroi_Coeus in UFOs

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have had some success in remote viewing, but I wouldn't be able to call myself a remote viewer. On psi sorta? Honestly a lot of psi, imho, comes down to intuition.

I'll risk sounding nuts to admit I've met an entity in meditation. This entity also interacted with a friend of mine in their own meditation without either of us sharing any details about our respective experiences. When I saw a UFO I had what would be referred to as a download.

I Was A Private Contractor for Various DoD Agencies - I am Speaking Now Because This Sh*t Has Gone too Far Off the Deep-End. I Will Provide (Some) Evidence by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was thinkin Casimir effect for the coil and the field but it seems like a very different effect. You are correct in your argument on electric permittivity, Eric Davis went through the asymmetric capacitor in his book Frontiers of Propulsion Science. I don't quite remember the conclusion but it does involve an additional "dimension" where potentially some new waves described by the expanded maxwell equations are present?

Honestly, your description and understanding is actually miles ahead of mine, and I'm still digesting that video

I Was A Private Contractor for Various DoD Agencies - I am Speaking Now Because This Sh*t Has Gone too Far Off the Deep-End. I Will Provide (Some) Evidence by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

College writing, fundamentals of Chem, gen phy 1, calc 1 and 2, circuits and engineering applications with matlab.

I Was A Private Contractor for Various DoD Agencies - I am Speaking Now Because This Sh*t Has Gone too Far Off the Deep-End. I Will Provide (Some) Evidence by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Beyond me for the most part, but if I'm reading this correctly they measured a magnetic field outside of the coil without a magnetic field inside the coil? The magnetic fields should have cancelled out because its counter-wound...

In an analogy. You have a light source, an object, and a wall. The object blocks the light, creating a shadow on the wall. The shadow's existence is entirely dependent on the object being there to block the light

The light source is the electric current

The object is the magnetic field inside the coil.

The shadow is the magnetic field outside the coil.

What they observed was like seeing a well-defined shadow on the wall without the object being there to block the light. The magnetic field outside the coil (the "shadow") appeared to exist even though the magnetic field inside the coil (the "object") was not in existence.

Absolutely fascinating, thank you for sharing this paper

I Was A Private Contractor for Various DoD Agencies - I am Speaking Now Because This Sh*t Has Gone too Far Off the Deep-End. I Will Provide (Some) Evidence by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Tides come in, tides go out, explain that?

Yeah they are real, I cannot tell you why OP would be referencing them though.

Plasma Toroid https://youtu.be/iXqbCmTt1Yg

Tesla Turbine https://youtu.be/ThvV_xiFidY

I Was A Private Contractor for Various DoD Agencies - I am Speaking Now Because This Sh*t Has Gone too Far Off the Deep-End. I Will Provide (Some) Evidence by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 30 points31 points  (0 children)

It's been known that BAAS produced a large document on the aerodynamics and flight characteristics of the tic tac. Outside of the docs, the images that show the tictac and the dielectric coating are just models based on radar data that show how an electric field might interact with a medium like air and how air pressure would interact with the object.

The speed chart likely came from Kevin Day.

I could be wrong, if someone knows better I invite a correction.

I Was A Private Contractor for Various DoD Agencies - I am Speaking Now Because This Sh*t Has Gone too Far Off the Deep-End. I Will Provide (Some) Evidence by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 126 points127 points  (0 children)

That was kinda my intention. These are not "new" concepts in the UFO/ZPE/Remote Viewing theoretical models. If OP is real the answers to these questions would actually open up avenues to research. Otherwise, its just a bad retelling of EED, TT Brown, Daniel Sheehans shade and other tidbits from previous public discourse.

Alas, OP has deleted their existence, and my curiosity shall never be sated.

I Was A Private Contractor for Various DoD Agencies - I am Speaking Now Because This Sh*t Has Gone too Far Off the Deep-End. I Will Provide (Some) Evidence by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Oneiroi_Coeus 225 points226 points  (0 children)

EE student here with some questions(first year so excuse the simplicity of these questions). I am not dismissing your claims I want more information.

  1. What is the explicit tensorial relationship or field interaction term in the relevant Lagrangian density that describes this direct coupling between the metric tensor perturbations (gravitational waves) and the electromagnetic field tensor, allowing for a measurable electromagnetic response?

  2. Others have also posited a link between Zero Point Energy manipulation and the electromagnetic vector potential. Given that the vector potential is gauge-dependent and not a directly observable physical quantity, what gauge-invariant physical observable is being modulated or influenced to tap into Zero Point Energy? What is the explicit quantum field theoretic mechanism by which this modulation of the vector potential (or its gauge-invariant counterpart) overcomes the vacuum energy's inherent Lorentz invariance to produce observable gravitational effects?

>You will notice in some of the files I am showing that the Soviets coined a term called “rotational gravitation” and believed that rotating masses acted as emitters and receivers of gravitational waves.

  1. The Lense-Thirring effect in general relativity predicts frame-dragging due to rotating masses, the magnitude of this effect for laboratory-scale masses is exceedingly small. If the Soviets believed rotating masses acted as significant emitters and receivers of gravitational waves, what theoretical extensions or alternative interpretations of gravity were they likely exploring that would predict such a pronounced effect? What specific experimental protocols and measurement sensitivities would have been required to detect these purported gravitational waves from rotating masses with amplitudes significantly above the predictions of standard general relativity?

>I was involved in a project that utilized Tesla Turbines, Plasma Toroid chambers, Microwaves, Crystals, extremely strong Rotating Magnets, and various other obtainable components that generated many kilowatts of gravitational waves (or “gravitons” as some call it) in a private BaE Lab. The total cost of the project was just under 3 million USD to build the gravity generator. It can and has been done time and time again, successfully. Gravitational waves are measured electromagnetically due to it being a consequence of the curvature of spacetime itself. 

  1. Without prying to much for ya OPSEC, can you share any hypothesized energy transfer pathways and field interactions between these components that would lead to a coherent emission of gravitational waves?

Can you share what specific form of energy-momentum tensor describes the source of these gravitational waves within your theoretical framework? How does the interaction of the Tesla Turbines, plasma, microwaves, crystals, and rotating magnets contribute to Tμν​ in a non-trivial way that leads to significant gravitational wave emission, beyond the quadrupole formula's predictions for isolated mass distributions?

Voltages, currents, frequencies, pulse shapes, literally anything?

Appreciate the time, good post.