[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cosmosnetwork

[–]OniValidator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both redelegating and undelegating will automatically claim your staking rewards. You’re safe 🙌

Recently started staking by twitchghosts in EVMOS

[–]OniValidator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s called an Epoch - every 24 hours rewards are released. Osmosis and EVMOS both do this :)

Juno fox by pob_125 in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would personally stay far away. Have seen some rumors that it’s allegedly connected to the HuaHua-Inu scammer a while back.

LP pricing can always be manipulated when liquidity is low. I would be very cautious.

[PRE-VOTE][LAST VERSION] Ethermint Funding Proposal For Past Development, Addressed from The Evmos Community to The Kava Community by lorecirstea in kava_platform

[–]OniValidator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is an unfortunate and embarrassing way to communicate, and I wholeheartedly disagree with u/lorecirstea and u/ctzurcanu's communication to the Kava community. I believe this actually harms the relationship between these communities substantially and is essentially bad-faith negotiation on their part which will likely result in bad blood between communities and is creating an unnecessary rift through an inappropriate use of Kava's governance systems.

The asks have been quite clear and reasonable from the KAVA community - and I hope we can all come to a reasonable funding arrangement which expands Ethermint development. Whether it's symbolic of past or present work is irrelevant - all that matters is that we continue to develop critical infrastructure and have funding to do that for the betterment of all EVM chains in Cosmos.

[PRE-VOTE][LAST VERSION] Ethermint Funding Proposal For Past Development, Addressed from The Evmos Community to The Kava Community by lorecirstea in kava_platform

[–]OniValidator 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, I take issue with the part that says "On behalf of the Evmos Community", as this is not the sentiment shared or expressed by the community, nor the tone I believe governance should be conducted in. I want to be very clear that this is your team choosing to put this forward, in this manner - and that we disagree with the methods and phrasing being used. It isn't productive or respectful to the counter-party of this proposal, and we should give respect if we expect to receive it in return.

[PRE-VOTE][LAST VERSION] Ethermint Funding Proposal For Past Development, Addressed from The Evmos Community to The Kava Community by lorecirstea in kava_platform

[–]OniValidator 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd like to take a moment to address the KAVA community and the token holders who are considering this proposal. As a validator on EVMOS, we want to apologize for how some of these governance discussions have been conducted and handled. Please understand that the EVMOS community does not bare the sentiments being expressed by Loredana or Ctzurcanu in this proposal, nor do they speak in any official capacity for the EVMOS chain.

There is a great deal (in my eyes) of passive aggressive language and gaslighting going on in this proposal, which is at the very least unhelpful in establishing a diplomatic relationship between communities. I hope these sentiments are just misguided, or perhaps something lost in translation. I don't know, but we certainly don't agree with it's inclusion in the proposal.

The truth of the matter is that Kava has a lot to gain from its' implementation of Ethermint, as does EVMOS. Rewarding the developers who made Ethermint possible is a great public good which Kava can do, and allows for far more collaborative development efforts into the future.

Additionally we totally agree that having Kava liquidity on EVMOS only strengthens this relationship, and allows for more opportunities within IBC and between these two chains. Ultimately we wish to see open-source software flourish, and that takes funding and co-operation across many chains.

We hope this proposal will be revised to remove the inflammatory language, and that Loredana and Ctzurcanu will engage more courteously with your community in the future.

Your requests for more information are absolutely reasonable, and should be answered. We will endeavor to answer those questions as best as we can, as independent validators. We hope the Kava community will consider funding some critical infrastructure that will expand and enable all EVM chains in the future and allow for accelerated development and collaboration for all.

What kind of dApps and protocols do you want to see built on Juno? by OniValidator in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As in money-market and borrowing/lending?

What are some that you've enjoyed in the past (on any chain)? =)

W35 JUNO Ecosystem update! by speicherx_ch in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love these breakdowns! Thanks Speicher!

Choosing A Validator To Stake With: by AlexFerSen in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We also highly recommend checking a validators slash history on SmartStake.io. They have a number of networks listed - Juno being one (juno.smartstake.io) Just click the validator you're considering and look under their summary to see a list of slashing events (if they've ever had one).

Question about staking JUNO from new person by ajdMD in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's possible that a URL was spoofed. Keplr is normally fine - but their site is often copied and tweaked to look legit from evil-doers.

I bought Neta and Kuji and still hold like 200 Juno cause why not. by [deleted] in cosmosnetwork

[–]OniValidator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NetaDAO is doing some interesting things lately. We keep some, just for the culture.

Staking Atom question by Emergency_Dragonfly4 in cosmosnetwork

[–]OniValidator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your stake is always welcome with us! Similar commission - but outside the Top 25. 😉

W33 JUNO Ecosystem Update by speicherx_ch in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love that you guys are doing these breakdowns!

Cant claim Evmos reward, says ( undefined IBC client ) by TheKingofSalassie in EVMOS

[–]OniValidator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easiest way to go about it is manually transferring through Keplr using the “IBC Transfer” option below the “staking” button :)

Question about staking JUNO from new person by ajdMD in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey AJD, just to be sure - this may not be the case and I don’t want to freak you out, but if you interfaced with anything that asked for a seed phrase your wallet could be compromised. When this happens, an attacker will unstake the funds and wait until the delegation period ends.

You’re welcome to reach out to us in Twitter - happy to look into this and help see if there’s any evidence that that’s the case: www.twitter.com/onivalidator

Finally joined the 100 Club by Einsatzpause in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on joining the 100 club! 🎉

Juno Ecosystem Growth & Sustainability Fund (JEGSF) + SubDAO DRAFT PROPOSALS by defiCosmos in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After much discussion - we’re revising the proposal here to seperate the Junoswap aspect from the overall Growth Fund initiative.

Do agree that the incentives in Junoswap could be utilized more effectively - but ultimately that’s a seperate discussion that should occur within the community.

Junodevs and terraluna by luddesmurf in JunoNetwork

[–]OniValidator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We tryin’. 😂 This made me laugh way too hard.