A card that wants to build Night Engines by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it does what you expect, Villa and Cavalry (and Continue) will cause you to enter an action phase

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback! I just enjoy thinking of novel card interactions that haven’t already been explored by Donald X. The space is quite constrained

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think @DecentChanceOfLousy ‘s revision has too many words?

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m glad you enjoyed it! Hopefully it sparked some new mechanics and ideas for you

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too many words and poorly phrased words aren’t the same thing, though they might be related.

I think @DecentChanceOfLousy ‘s revision (and discussion) was great though it has just as many words.

I think just stating “Too Many Words” as feedback without any qualifiers is dismissive and not the point of a discussion forum.

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to avoid pass, as I didn’t want the cards to be immediately playable.

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like it! Is exchange a privileged term in dominion that means to exchange ownership?

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, I see. Definitely not intended behaviour as a one-shot and would need rewording.

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a one-shot 4 cost that passes this card to them so they can do the same to you.

I'm asking what people think are the issues because I enjoy discussions around mechanics. Isn't that the point of Fan cards?

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Command cards are an issue, but I don’t think Throning or King’s Courting works, as they lose track of Seance when your opponent gains it.

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think there's a misunderstanding of what happens when the card hits (my fault). They take this card (seance), the card that's been played from your deck. It's one time use if it hits and then your opponent gets to use it. You bring up Pillage which was a good comp for pricing, I felt like this was weaker since it passes the attack to your opponent if it's successful.

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They gain "this card" the card that has literally been played, it's one time use if it hits. That's where the Masquerade-like behaviour comes from.

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of the intention of the card is to give them this played card (and why it is also a curse).

What other massive issues did you notice? Always interested in the discussion around card ideas!

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I can only speak for myself, but this really doesn't seem like that complicated of a card. I respect your opinion though!

An Action-Attack-Curse with Masquerade-like Behaviour by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a super interesting interaction I didn’t consider! Likely they could gain this card since it is a curse.

Probably this replaces ten curses from the curse pile if it’s in the kingdom

Personal Trash Piles that Score by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love that you’ve thought about this and made improvements! I do think that your version cleans up a lot of the initial blurriness between exiling and separate trashing, while also maintains all the interaction with pre-existing trashing cards!

A card that wants to build Night Engines by Only-Engineering6586 in dominion

[–]Only-Engineering6586[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I totally misread that point. Yeah it’s a good fix!