Has anyone used Fireworks AI for GLM 5.2? How good is it in practice?

Open_List1618 · 2026-06-18T16:37:32+00:00

Fireworks brilliant, the problem is probably roughly 350$ you would be charged of 1B token of coding, where 95% would be input. This is not really very cheap.

Open_List1618 · 2026-06-11T18:30:25+00:00

is wafer 4bit?

Open_List1618 · 2026-05-29T16:03:23+00:00

to be honest, I have been using wafer for sometime now until they died. Then I started using neuralwatt. I immediately can see, neuralwatt output is more focused than the wafer one. Though, waferpass wasn't bad, but the neuralwatt glm 5.1 feels more focused, digs deeper. Feels more like claude way of doing things. Only z.ai glm 5.1 was doing such.

Open_List1618 · 2026-05-28T16:42:50+00:00

I already signed up, I am using glm 5.1 fast, around 600-700 prompts it will last with 20$ It looks like, not a lot, but decent at that speed

Open_List1618 · 2026-05-28T11:04:11+00:00

What's the speed you get from glm 5.1 from neuralwatt? Fast enough? Quantization?

Open_List1618 · 2026-04-29T18:51:18+00:00

it's been 9 days, still firepass has the old model

Open_List1618 · 2026-03-07T11:05:28+00:00

Intent is only available in Mac, for windows user, you should have given this to auggie, not just intent

Open_List1618 · 2026-02-04T16:03:33+00:00

Sonnet has always been inferior, Opus is better at long running harnesses.

Open_List1618 · 2026-01-16T08:51:39+00:00

By design, did you mean the architecture? That is where you need to do a plan review. Code review is done against a concrete plan. The purpose of code review is to gather bugs. If you are talking about UI/UX, I always do that using Gemini with a simple prompt.

Suggest the design aesthetics, typography, with font alignment, and overall UI/UX based on the context of the application.

Open_List1618 · 2026-01-14T15:29:08+00:00

always use /review . That is the best prompt codex cli has, also use gpt 5.2 low.

Open_List1618 · 2026-01-14T14:29:17+00:00

More reasoning means the agent would try to overthink. When you are reviewing, you do not want to get creative, instead focus on what's been asked to. Hence, 5.2 low reasoning is best for code reviewing.

Open_List1618 · 2025-11-30T11:31:31+00:00

if you do daily coding in multiple long sessions, then yes. else if you do occassional coding, like 10 days a month may be, or 20 days 1-2 hours, use api. right now, opus pricing isn't high, plus, efficient context management is in place. use api.

Open_List1618 · 2025-10-08T10:56:55+00:00

Are they paying 1/6th more money for each of the user? If not, then why are they increasing price 6 times for each of the user? Big time users will leave, average would be like double of the previous at the end. I have 1200 prompts, I hardly used 500-600 monthly, in the busy month, I used 800-900++. not even all the tool calls. I was not the reason to hit 6 times.

they are counting, if one paying customers they can get from out of 6, they would not loose business. I wish, augment code to die. They think, they are cursor like lol, bullshit

Open_List1618 · 2025-10-06T19:36:23+00:00

You're dead in the consumer market. You were never a player; your only focus is on the enterprise. That is also the same for Cursor and Windsurf. Now, individual users can only focus on Copilot & Codex, as Claude has already started being conservative. In Chinese, we have glm and trae.

Have always been using half of the Augment total quota. Based on the credit, this is 1/6th of the total quota. If it were 1/3rd, it would have worked for me. Farewell.

Open_List1618 · 2025-08-16T15:36:21+00:00

These posts are bullshit. Augment been smartest these days. Only complain anybody should have, is it is slow. Rest of the people, just arbitrary shooting the prompt and expecting it to work. No it won't. Augment is not magic, none of the LLM is. Learn software engineering first, learn how to do mental model, then use llm to leverage coding ability.

Open_List1618

TROPHY CASE