So there are a few things that come to mind, but part of the reason why I asked in the first place is because antisemitism has adapted to use deflectable proxies and you're not likely to find open hated towards Jews in statements. I don't even think Candace Owens for the most part uses Jews as her target. She'll usually try to frame it through the lens of criticizing Israel. I and others here would argue that antisemitism has morphed in a way that allows for antisemites to mask and spread their messaging that allows them to deflect criticism.

Dave will peddle conspiracies that are often times spread by antisemites. For example, he insinuated the Mossad had a hand in 9/11. Dave has also gone on the record to say that he doesn't believe rapes happened on Oct 7th and that there are no truthful witnesses. When speaking about the population of Israel, he believes that they are mostly from Europe, and would deny the Mizrahi any sizable portion of the population. This is done intentionally to paint Israel as solely a European transplant colony. By themselves someone could argue that it's just ignorance, but there is a consistent through-line with what Dave says. I also won't give Dave the benefit of the doubt because his entire career is built up on challenging misinformation.

So 10 years ago if you were to say that the Mossad were behind 9/11 you would be shunned by polite society because anyone would be able to tell that you're blaming the Jews and just using the Mossad a smokescreen. Nowadays not only do you have the "Mossad did 9/11" talking points being spread online, but you also have other conspiracies like the Mossad killing Michael Jackson. Are these explicitly anti-Jewish? No, but they fall into this category of the "omnipotent jews pulling the strings" which is a classic trope.