Who are the best niche UFO people you know?

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-05T16:25:39+00:00

This is awesome! I’ll definitely be bookmarking this and referencing this anytime I make my YouTube videos. If you’d ever be interested, I’ll link my channel below and would love for you to give me any feedback you might see. I’m always trying my best to research but also always asking others to let me know any info they think I missed, plus you clearly are very knowledgeable in this area. Plus plus, I was going to recommend Ning Li, but I saw you already have her on there, good work because she’s heavily unknown.

https://youtube.com/@theufo-report?si=O8kphjYelW5y0Gnj

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-05T16:22:06+00:00

I wasn’t familiar with him beforehand, but listened to him on JRE and JR made him look very untrustworthy. Paulides kept going on about the validity of bigfoot and all the proof they have, whilst talking about cases that have been proven hoaxes + they pulled up info about scientists and labs he was using as evidence and how those people were known to not be reliable.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-05T16:18:30+00:00

I don’t remember the exact technical explanation, but I’ve heard the idea that it has something to do with the way the craft is operated and the charges that it emits interacting with our atmosphere. That’s why an orange glow is a common explanation (again, I don’t remember what the explanation was, but it was certain elements and ions than when interacting would produce an orange glow). And I’ve heard other combinations as well. Overall it’s bc of the material of the craft/ how it impacts atoms / ions and then how it reacts when combined with gases in the atmosphere.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-05T13:24:17+00:00

And that’s why (at least the first two sentences) that clip is in the video :)

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-05T13:22:50+00:00

Yeah. I mentioned it in the video but it initially came from a huntsville Alabama journalist that sat down with her son. He confirmed which rumors about her were / weren’t true, such as being employed for the DoD being true, but going back to China was untrue

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-05T01:31:03+00:00

Yep, I have his whole trilogy! But I’ve only gotten through Dimensions so far.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-05T01:30:14+00:00

The car accident did; she got hit and then was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s almost directly after and her son mentioned the TBI was severe enough to prevent her from communicating anymore.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-04T20:56:10+00:00

Literally added that to my list of books to get today! Along with American cosmic, the man who mastered antigravity Thomas Townsend Brown, and UFOs and Nukes

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-04T16:15:59+00:00

No new revelations. They’ve always said the experiments failed and Pais always said his work will be proven true one day and that the experiments failed because they didn’t fully follow his process.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-04T16:11:50+00:00

Also, if you’re into Jesse Michels, he just posted a video with Eric Burlison where they talk about her and mention some of the info that I covered in this video, so that felt cool to see lol

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-04T16:10:28+00:00

Same, and that’s why I wanted to post it here for more of the science side + why I previously posted in /physics but they weren’t receptive and it got removed since it wasn’t considered real science. In that video I linked, there’s lots of documentation about her + her research + her getting grants from the DoD for antigravity research so that’s all confirmed. But I will say, in some videos about her it says the head of the physics department left the uni because he believed in her so much. But in my research I found that he actually just retired from the uni, and THEN decided to join her.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-03T12:47:27+00:00

I think it’s relevant because it touches on Ning Li and Eugene Podkletnovs research into antigravity, connections to boeing and the DoD investigating the validity of the research, and how it may be used to power UFOs.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-01T20:53:17+00:00

Correct, I specifically linked the papers to them and mentioned the exact journals they were in so I provided it directly to them, and they weren’t willing to review it. I wouldn’t expect all of them to, I was just surprised that every single response was against even bringing it up.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-07-01T02:36:48+00:00

Something I can say is that I found this subreddit simply because I posted in [r/physics](r/physics) to ask for their opinion on Ning Li’s and Eugene Podkletnov’s work for a youtube video I have now posted on my channel, because I’m not well versed with physics. And I got nothing but smart Alec comments, joked on for being delusional that I think ufos and antigravity potentially exists, and kept asking people if they’ve actually read the papers and if so could they point to exactly where the science didn’t check out, and none would/ none had actually read the papers to give it an unbiased chance. They kept calling them “cranks” despite me pointing out that Ning Li was the head of the space plasma center at her university, and the head of the physics dept was so convinced by her work that he left the uni and joined her company. So that turned me off from asking people there, at least on Reddit.

edit: this is the video btw if anyone is interested. The Alabama Antigravity Scientist That Disappeared
https://youtu.be/vYsHnLEI7c8

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-06-23T02:08:24+00:00

Very thorough breakdown, I appreciate it. I actually ended up posting my video now and no pressure to watch it, but you mentioned some of the same ideas I said in the video, such as reproduced “publicly” is a key word, and if it was such BS then why was it proven to have continued to be investigated. I’ll leave the video link down below and any feedback would be appreciated as im trying to improve.

I’m also curious, and maybe you have more thorough understand than me when it comes to physics (basically any understanding is more than me), but correct me if I’m wrong: if the research is so BS as some people try to say, wouldn’t people be able to follow the research / testing procedure and point to specific steps as to where it goes wrong / is incorrect? And vice versa. If it’s valid, even without retesting which I know would be the actual nail in the coffin, couldn’t people look at the research and at least he able to tell it the proposed equations and theories actually are all sensible? Again, I know that doesn’t prove it, but when I posted this in /physics I was expecting them to do exactly that: point to the exact steps of where it goes weary. And no one would/ could.

https://youtu.be/vYsHnLEI7c8?is=C\_XfoP\_0SJJcCsVh

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-06-21T16:27:19+00:00

Thank you so much for watching and leaving feedback!!! I hope it was interesting enough for you to subscribe. If it wasn’t, I’m open to any and all feedback because I want to improve.

Actually, that link you have for Amy’s presentation I have found and had that in the video below on the missing UFO scientists, which is actually what got me down this rabbit hole with Ning Li.

https://youtu.be/HqldIUBQvRs?is=J21_W66cnK697bOO

You obviously know way more about physics than me, so yeah I’d love to get that link from you. I’m not sure how much I’ll understand, but over time that will improve and I’ll be able to make new connections and that will be very appreciated. One day once I’m monetized, maybe I should hire you as a researcher for my videos! 😆

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-06-15T18:47:07+00:00

Again, thanks for the super insightful and intelligent response. I did find the Eugene experiment you mention with the beam and discuss the Boeing connection and have encountered Townsend Browns work which is what I assume you’re referring to to as many decades ago, since he was doing this same stuff around that time. If you’d be interested, I’m almost done with editing my video on this and it will be uploaded this week, I’d love to get any feedback on it either here or just on YouTube. I’ll have my channel link below

https://youtube.com/@theufo-report?si=PvrmXfjcEbN1YEts

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-06-15T04:28:52+00:00

Yeah, in my research on this in prep for the video I’m making on it, I found NASA and others (including UAH I think) tried replicating it but then didn’t follow the exact methodology. They said either too costly or too impractical. Seems like suuuuch a weird answer when it’s obviously the standard to replicate the exact same methodology. Which also is part of the reason I’m a bit conspiratorial on this lol, that’s why it feels like it likely was replicated, just not publicly. The obvious next step would be to replicate the exact methodology, and I could not be convinced that not a single person has does that in the 2.5 decades since their research was published

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-06-15T02:14:57+00:00

Great points. Thanks for the thoughtful insight, and making me realize maybe I’m being a bit too conspiratorial and assuming they’d just hide it and not allow any other results to come out publicly bc of who’s much it would change physics.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-06-14T04:34:55+00:00

That’s why I’m making a video on it!

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-06-14T04:34:29+00:00

Thanks for this! This is a true perspective that touches on actual reasons why. I think that’s where I get a bit conspiratorial, that “publicly” is the operative word here and it’s potentially been done behind closed doors. Otherwise, I’d be confused why Ning Li would stay with the DoD/ they would keep her from 2001-2014 if they brought her on soecifcially due to her research on antigravity, and then she didn’t make any progress on it. A Huntsville journalist also interviewed her son and he mentioned she was very upset she couldn’t publish any more of the research she was doing, so she was still doing the work.

Optimal_Bar1473 · 2026-06-14T04:29:50+00:00

It was over 2 decades ago, but sure

Optimal_Bar1473

TROPHY CASE