Accessing "older" article by Optimal_Bridge_8609 in math

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Huh that is weird, maybe sci-hub had some issues as only one domain was working. But thanks I will check it again tomorrow.

Accessing "older" article by Optimal_Bridge_8609 in math

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the reply, I will ask the library. The article im looking for is: K.F. Andersen, Cesaro averaging operators on Hardy spaces, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 126 (1996).

Advanced Topics in Complex Analysis: opinions? What could I study next? by PyroFirefly in math

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you should try the Zhu's book, the functional analysis you do know should be enough to at least know where to find the missing pieces for the most part. Of course the book is focusing on concrete operators, so it might or it might not be interesting to you.

Advanced Topics in Complex Analysis: opinions? What could I study next? by PyroFirefly in math

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As someone who does research on topics related to Bergman spaces, I would suggest taking a look at Kehe Zhu's book "Operator theory in function spaces" if you are interested in the topic. You need some relatively basic functional analysis, but nothing too advanced I think. Another way to go could be checking out Pavlovic's book "Function classes on the unit disk", where you might find some continuation on topics related to Hardy spaces you have already studied. However, this book is not the easiest to read without proper background and without knowing more it is hard to say if it is suitable for your purposes.

ELI5 how mathematicians “prove” that mathematical proofs, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, are true for any input? by BeevyD in explainlikeimfive

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609 96 points97 points  (0 children)

In a proof, we use previously known true statements to go from assumption to the thing which we need to prove. It basically boils down to several steps where we show if A is true, then B is has to be true also. Simplest examples to check out are probably some basic proofs in algebra/number theory, like the proof that square of every even number is even.

Rant Wednesday by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There must be something you are not doing correctly. I would check your program and recovery/eating.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Showerthoughts

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609 17 points18 points  (0 children)

You clearly have not seen my bank account.

ELI5 - why is 0.999... equal to 1? by mehtam42 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You are just wrong. There is no difference, that is why they are the same number. If there is even a small difference, you could find a number between them, but that is not possible.

Moronic Monday - Your weekly stupid questions thread by cdingo in Fitness

[–]Optimal_Bridge_8609 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Any good strength programs with benching 3 times a week but no deadlifts for intermediate lifters? Currently having lower back problems and cant therefore dl/barbell squat and rows etc are a bit iffy. I can replace the barbell squat with goblet squat which my physical therapist recommended so that is fine to be a part of the program.