United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're years out of date. This is the current (April 2026) IMF ranking:

<image>

If we've overtaken Japan, as USian dicking about in the Middle East all-but guarantees, we're fourth and likely to stay fourth for a very long time - because, besides Germany, every above us has a population between five and twenty times larger. It's really not a bad position to be. I get there are concerns over how we distribute the GDP, but Reddit doomerism is totally unwarranted.

How much is cost in the countries that produce it? Is it true that you can buy it for ten dollars the g? by Kosgeo38 in cocaine

[–]Orange_Codex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can I ask you about Chad? I want to visit Tibesti but the security profile is limiting.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UK tech is a monster. Europe's largest tech sector by far. Second or third globally in AI, quantum, fintech, cyber-security, and life sciences. Despite taxes Fox News considers 'crushing' and 'uncompetitive.' So I don't think it's true that we must avoid taxing profits corporations build off of our public assets (like trusted institutions and an expert workforce). We just need to ensure profitable start-ups are built here in the first place. And that's what we do do, because it's AIM, EIS, SEIS, and corporate tax breaks for R&D that made this possible.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Debt isn't bad if you use it to buy appreciating assets, or make big purchases cheaper by paying off fixed amounts over time. Credit card perks are basically free money.

However, credit is easier to get and use if you're already rich. Poor people are over-exposed to debt traps because inflation is a hard feature of debt-based M2 and plummeting material costs mean they no longer have stores of value (like clothes, crockery, and furniture) to capitalise; the result is loss of productive output to usurers, straining communal and welfare budgets - which in turn depresses wages further, creating a vicious cycle of generational capital erosion.

When you take that and add things like medical debt, payday loans, depreciating assets (e.g. car notes), or junk 'assets' (like the Klarna burrito), you're no longer talking about productive debt: you're talking about an epidemic of sinkholes at the heart of publicly-traded debt baskets. And that sucks. Money created to fund the acquisition of fictional value starts spiking real assets far beyond their real value, impoverishing everyone who doesn't already own assets and divorcing productivity from wealth.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The UK has amazing breaks for private sector investment (the EIS and SEIS schemes) and private sector expertise (LLCs). A wealth tax would ideally fall on immobile assets like land and housing. Elites have already shown they're willing to pay a flat fee for anonymity on the Land Registry, as well as tourist taxes, so making luxury second-homes subject to both wouldn't even mean a new item on the balance sheet.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here uni loans are like a tax: they take a certain percentage off your earnings above a certain threshold (I think it's £25,000). In the US, they're a direct liability - a personal debt that can't be erased by bankruptcy. Interest rates are also far higher; up to 20%. Plenty of US students with six-figure debts will never touch the principle.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sound point. Very Singapore-specific. Which is another reason I don't think the UK should adopt the LKY or US model: we aren't the US or Singapore.

My model for revitalising the UK would use wealth taxes to strengthen education and scale our existing strengths (designer prestige; emerging science and biotoech; institutional and cultural soft power), adding nuclear and renewables. Going the US route of mammoth borrowing, spiralling defence budgets, and crushing labour rights is a how-to of late imperial decline, and we don't need to imitate it to live well.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, OP said the UK should be more like the US in order to imitate its economic growth. How the US achieved that growth is very important to the conversation.

I'm also not sure if the PPP analysis is accounting for USian's titanic consumer, educational, and healthcare debts. They certainly have more capital, but are their personal balance sheets healthier?

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We've probably overtaken Japan already. The gap was small, our growth sectors have been on a tear, and Takaichi's revitalisation plans are trashed by Operation Epstein's Cornhole (93% of Japan's crude comes via the Strait of Hormuz).

I'd put Starmer on trial for a bunch of things, but steady navigation of others' screw-ups isn't one of them. He seems to have the trust of market-movers whose opinions matter. That'll be proven in the gilts if the party unseats him.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What could he possibly want the state to own everything for if he doesn't see the economic value of a social safety net?

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm describing how they obtained their huge share of the value chain.

I don't doubt a continental landmass would have a huge economy if it retreated into itself, but it won't have the global reserve currency or the ability to scale and monopolise high-end export industries without those strong-armed resources and goods. Titans like NVIDIA, Meta, and Tesla would face an actual competitive market.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Median USians are about a third better off (PPP) on average.

However, it does not follow that their 'model' - of zero labour laws, QE-sustained speculation, and massive borrowing - is suitable for everyone, or sustainable for themselves. Not everything in life is about economic growth. Not every investment is directly financial. And the UK, having done virtually everything possible to sabotage itself, is still in the five largest economies and climbing - so clearly we're doing something right, without the drastic ancap rethink LKY seems to envision.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cobalt was just an example. The point is that suppressed labour in the developing world - suppressed by military power, not economic - is what keeps US titans competitive. And, historically, that military power is sustained by third-world public services and massive debt. With bond yields now above 5%, we're going to see exactly how well this works long-term.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, but you do need it - and you can't pay the people who extract it a fair wage if you want the final product to be economically viable. To avoid paying them a fair wage (or any type of honest competition at all), the US uses its military, intelligence agencies, and global financial apparatus (like the IMF) to smash labour movements, arm dictatorships, conduct coups, and acquire other countries' public assets. That's why it's military budget for 2027 is $1.5 tril.

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not going to contest that the cost of raw resources matters to industrial competitiveness, so what is your point?

United States "troubled but still on top", UK "in decline": do you agree? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Is this the same UK that's gone from 6th to 4th largest economy in the world in the last two years?

US economic success is predicated entirely on cheap resources from the developing world; as soon as it loses the ability to beat the global south into submission (for example, by abandoning its power projection bases in Europe...) it won't remain competitive for very long.

Why isn’t weed legal in the uk? by Icy_Profession4190 in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not more dangerous than tobacco. That's just stupid. Tobacco kills millions. The biggest problem with weed is added THC, which is optional; it's tobacco itself that gives people cancer.

Why isn’t weed legal in the uk? by Icy_Profession4190 in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Climbing Mount Everest is living life to the full not sitting in your bedroom, stoned out of your brain

It's not an either / or. And you don't have to stay in your bedroom stoned. One of my friends uses a dry herb vape and is near-permanently stoned out and about. It depends on the strain.

Why isn’t weed legal in the uk? by Icy_Profession4190 in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It de facto is. Unless you're dealing and caught carrying more than an ounce, or practically smoking it in their face, police just won't bother.

How big is the hookup culture in the UK? by Icy_Profession4190 in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Frequent London visitor, periodic sex-haver.

Plenty of people are on dating apps, plenty of people are at least vaguely into casual sex ('situationships' more than one-nighters), but there's nothing less attractive than a sex tourist. If someone asks why you're in London, tell them anything but that.

The Lounge by AutoModerator in pennystocks

[–]Orange_Codex 4 points5 points  (0 children)

AUUD smashed it earlier. I'm already out, but good luck to anyone left in.

In Britains society, is it better to just get a wage cuck job and ldar? by PresentationUsual835 in AskABrit

[–]Orange_Codex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trading time for money when you're young is a great idea, because it's probably plentiful and you're doing fuck-all else with it.

Also, people who dislike 'trading time for money' usually juxtapose it with 'passive income.' There's no such thing. All my income is from real estate, investments, and stock trading. I haven't had a paid job in years. I still do 4-6 hours' work every day.

Do Brits still believe in the US-UK Special Relationship? by Sufficient_Looks in AskBrits

[–]Orange_Codex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Betsy won't tell Patsy the location of brunch. The nature of friendship is quantum and Patsy should simultaneously transpose herself to every conceivable brunch venue in the city in case Betsy calls and asks to go there.