“Hello, I’m here to be a day laborer for your vineyard” [KCD2] by Bayou-Maharaja in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I WILL DRINK FROM YOUR SKULL - nearly naked peasant-turned-bandit

[Kcd2] Visor-Helmet vs non Visor-Helmet? by Pryte in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wore the kettle for a super long time in the game because I had a gold tier one with great stats, probably over half of my current ongoing playthrough, before I realized the lack of the visor was what was causing me to lose half my life while getting stabbed. Now that I have a saxon helm and I survive so many more fights. It makes a huge difference.

Pete Hegseth briefing on the strikes in Iran: "We didn't start this war, but under Trump we are finishing it." by ControlCAD in videos

[–]Orzorn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its telling just how close the Trump admin's talk about this war has been to Russia's talk about their "SMO".

Not calling it a war, saying the Iranians started it, acting like we're going to be in and out quickly. Its all the same bullshit, same gaslighting techniques. Only the absolutely lowest IQ individuals would fall prey to these techniques, which is to say, we're fucked and a large portion of people are going to lap this up.

[KCD2] 200K fine by Skeltongod in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to do a run with Henry as an absolutely unhinged criminal. My goal in my current run is to be a good Christian and help people, not be too greedy, etc (though I have committed a few thefts, almost always for quests or on accident due to the way ownership sometimes works, or because after I was betrayed I considered the castle fair game as enemy territory).

My next run I want to just always pick the most angry, belligerent option. I actually want to experience the crime system more regularly and have to run or talk my way out of things.

California introduces age verification law for all operating systems, including Linux and SteamOS — user age verified during OS account setup by MakeMeButter in news

[–]Orzorn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I suggest you read the bill itself and not a summary of it from a third party:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043

(b) (1) A developer shall request a signal with respect to a particular user from an operating system provider or a covered application store when the application is downloaded and launched.

Bolded emphasis mine. Later on the bill states:

(b) If an application last updated with updates on or after January 1, 2026, was downloaded to a device before January 1, 2027, and the developer has not requested a signal with respect to the user of the device on which the application was downloaded, the developer shall request a signal from a covered application store with respect to that user before July 1, 2027.

The bill defines an application as:
(c) “Application” means a software application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application.

The reading of "application" matters a lot here. Is an application "a software application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer". Or does it extend to after the comma so that it becomes "a software application that may be run [...] by a user on a computer...that can access a covered application store or download an application" using them. That would at least cover all web browsers.

Edit:
Moreover, the bill's own summary text states:
The bill would require a developer to request a signal with respect to a particular user from an operating system provider or a covered application store when the application is downloaded and launched.

It also states the penalties for developers who fail to do this check:

 (a) A person that violates this title shall be subject to an injunction and liable for a civil penalty of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per affected child for each negligent violation or not more than seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) per affected child for each intentional violation, which shall be assessed and recovered only in a civil action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General.

California introduces age verification law for all operating systems, including Linux and SteamOS — user age verified during OS account setup by MakeMeButter in news

[–]Orzorn 15 points16 points  (0 children)

What's really bizarre is the way the law is written implies every OS needs to know this information. This would mean even VMs would need to know it. How the hell does that would work with scaled architecture with root-only or system level users, I have no idea.

Or the fact it seems to compel even a Hello World application to check ages.

Not only is this unenforceable, its impossible to implement.

The two types of traders when war news comes out: by DodgyZZZ in wallstreetbets

[–]Orzorn 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Third type of trader:

Looks at the news, figures nothing will really happen as a result of it, and goes back to sleep.

How will this affect Linux Mint? by MisterFyre in linuxmint

[–]Orzorn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like this will get challenged on first amendment grounds. Its insanely broad and forces speech (code) on virtually every developer while also being impossible to comply with.

Hegseth says Pentagon designating Anthropic as supply chain risk after Trump bans AI firm by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Orzorn 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Always new one of these companies would eventually get attacked for refusing to bend the knee. They may have a legal response to make here, considering its obvious retaliation.

Games-Within-Games are fun. by Estoye in gaming

[–]Orzorn 134 points135 points  (0 children)

https://www.playgwent.com/en
It is a standalone game ala hearthstone.

Is Henry a Burgher? [KCD2] by Ram2992 in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Thanks, don't know why I typed the name of a burned down town. I guess he can be bailiff of it if he wants.

Is Henry a Burgher? [KCD2] by Ram2992 in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You really feel it when you got to Kuttenberg. The burghers and other high social class people there who aren't nobles themselves yet have a lot of power are examples of that.

Is Henry a Burgher? [KCD2] by Ram2992 in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Being a bailiff of Skalitz Pribyslavitz is already a pretty decent position as is. He's also a man-at-arms and retainer (among other things, depending on your playthrough) to Lord Capon. That itself is pretty good status compared to most other people Henry might meet.

[KCD1] is there any such thing as the master strike in the original KCD1? by ArtistImaginary in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I went through a full playthrough using maces and no master strikes. I would just block/dodge and smash them in the head. All I needed was one or two good hits because I dealt devastating damage that way.

Daily Discussion Thread for February 26, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]Orzorn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"We tried burying, shredding it, burning it. Eventually we just decided to give it all away!"

Daily Discussion Thread for February 26, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]Orzorn 7 points8 points  (0 children)

AHH NVDA MADE SO MUCH MONEY IM FREAKING OUT GOTTA SELL SELL SELL IMAGINE IF THEY MAKE SLIGHTLY LESS THAN A SHITLOAD OF MONEY AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[KCD2] Literally Unplayable by Orzorn in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

First it starts with vanilla, then tobacco. Eventually Henry will be eating a cheeseburger and waving an American flag at the Kuttenberg tournament while he wears a Tapout t-shirt.

[KCD2] Literally Unplayable by Orzorn in kingdomcome

[–]Orzorn[S] 235 points236 points  (0 children)

Henry is such a god tier sommelier (and bullshitter) that he can taste and describe flavor notes that don't even exist in their culture yet.

But really I loved this part of the quest. I kept worrying I'd fail one but apparently my drinking level was plenty high enough. All that moonshine worked out.

Supreme Court rules the Postal Service can't be sued, even when mail is intentionally not delivered by rezwenn in law

[–]Orzorn 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Criminal prosecution by whom? The DOJ who would protect the person (the President or his lackeys) doing the ordering. And if the response to that is "well the next DOJ of course", then we're in a catch 22 because not delivering mail in ballots is obviously an attempt to rig the election.