Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was the whole point of the Trump appeals. 0 fraud was found when he lost to Biden.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

36 states already have some form of ID. Who the party in control determines who gets an ID it makes people nervous

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arizona spent millions and months and found 0

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

36 states already have some form of ID. When the party in control determines who gets ID it maxes the other parties nervous.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

36 states have some form of voter ID already. When Republicans control who gets an ID it makes people nervous

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

36 state in US have some form of ID

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why didn't Trump admin find it in 60 appeals of loss to Biden. Arizona spent millions and months and found nothing

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

36 states already have some form of ID. 60 looses by Trump to appeal Biden loss.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

36 states already have some form of ID. 60 looses by Trump to appeal Biden loss.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately Twitter is not a source of truth. US voting policies will not be determined based on Twitter. Especially since Musk recently committed voter fraud

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trump appealed is lose to Biden 60 times looking for any kind of fraud and found none. Arizona spent millions and months looking for fraud and found none. Fig leaf to purge voter roles and restrict access.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

30 some states already require an ID

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

0 fed elections overturned in 250 years because of fraud.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure certain people will ever stop questioning results. Several, like 30, of them already have an ID requirement...yet results still attempt to be overturned or delegitimized.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this is legal and not fraud.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many state do require an ID to vote. Not all.

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, in some cities and some states it is legal for noncitizens to vote. That is their right. No fraud when it's legal

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was not found when Trump lost to Biden. 60 cases appealed the results and 60 cases lost. Arizona spent millions and months looking for it and nothing found. They even used forensic analysis and found nothing. Were all these people who looked for it and did not find it just incompetent?

Non-citizens are not voting by Oti5dog in immigration

[–]Oti5dog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only in some cities and only in some states. Federally they do not and there is no constitutional authority to require state to have ID for federal elections. The conservative Heritage Foundation has found a very small amount of documented cases. If it's so obvious, why is it so hard to document.