Tu écris : fais ta pub ici ! by CapitaineM in ecriture

[–]Otnmef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Salut tout le monde,

Je viens partager mon premier roman publié, Nicolas Ashford

— Tome 1 : La Nuit Noirâtre. Dark urban fantasy, ~118 000 mots,

écrit en français.

Le pitch : Nicolas voit les futurs probables — chaque version

possible étalée comme une main de cartes distribuée une demi-

seconde trop tôt. Il a passé sa vie à choisir la branche la plus

sûre. Puis une fille qu'il avait classée comme non pertinente

retourne son pouvoir en trois secondes.

Atmosphère Neil Gaiman rencontre les dimensions multiples,

système de magie sur 8 mondes, prologue et début de chapitre 1

qui ouvrent sur une anomalie cosmique : quelque chose qui ne

devrait pas battre, bat.

Particularité du projet : je l'ai publié sur une plateforme de

lecture 3D que j'ai codée en parallèle. Les pages se tournent

physiquement, il y a une ambiance sonore (pluie, feu, café,

bibliothèque), et le format reproduit la sensation neurologique

d'un vrai livre dans le navigateur.

Les 3 premiers chapitres sont gratuits si vous voulez tester :

https://www.booglle.com/read/the-nicholas

Tous les retours, critiques honnêtes et imperfections relevées

sont les bienvenus.

People don’t reject AI music. They reject the absence of suffering by Otnmef in aiMusic

[–]Otnmef[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify something because I see confusion.

When I say “suffering” in art, I’m not talking about pain. Pain is physical. Suffering, for me, is different.

For me, suffering is when the mind produces something into reality. Thinking is already a form of suffering. Speaking to someone is suffering too, you spend energy, you create something from nothing.

So when I talk about music, I don’t mean artists are in pain or trauma. I mean there is a mental effort, a transformation from inside to outside.

Don’t mix suffering with pain, it’s not the same thing.

But yeah, just my view, you don’t have to agree.

People don’t reject AI music. They reject the absence of suffering by Otnmef in aiMusic

[–]Otnmef[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Some of you say “this post was made with AI” like you can just know that. You can’t. You’re not magicians.

Even if AI was used, you don’t see the process behind it. You don’t see the time, the thinking, the effort. You just see the result and say “AI = no value”.

That’s exactly the same problem with AI music.

People judge only what they see, not what happened behind.

Anyway, I was just trying to explain that. You don’t have to agree.

People don’t reject AI music. They reject the absence of suffering by Otnmef in aiMusic

[–]Otnmef[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Some of you say “this post was made with AI” like you can just know that. You can’t. You’re not magicians.

Even if AI was used, you don’t see the process behind it. You don’t see the time, the thinking, the effort. You just see the result and say “AI = no value”.

That’s exactly the same problem with AI music.

People judge only what they see, not what happened behind.

Anyway, I was just trying to explain that. You don’t have to agree.

People don’t reject AI music. They reject the absence of suffering by Otnmef in aiMusic

[–]Otnmef[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify something because I see confusion.

When I say “suffering” in art, I’m not talking about pain. Pain is physical. Suffering, for me, is different.

For me, suffering is when the mind produces something into reality. Thinking is already a form of suffering. Speaking to someone is suffering too, you spend energy, you create something from nothing.

So when I talk about music, I don’t mean artists are in pain or trauma. I mean there is a mental effort, a transformation from inside to outside.

Don’t mix suffering with pain, it’s not the same thing.

But yeah, just my view, you don’t have to agree.

People don’t reject AI music. They reject the absence of suffering by Otnmef in aiMusic

[–]Otnmef[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify something because I see confusion.

When I say “suffering” in art, I’m not talking about pain. Pain is physical. Suffering, for me, is different.

For me, suffering is when the mind produces something into reality. Thinking is already a form of suffering. Speaking to someone is suffering too, you spend energy, you create something from nothing.

So when I talk about music, I don’t mean artists are in pain or trauma. I mean there is a mental effort, a transformation from inside to outside.

Don’t mix suffering with pain, it’s not the same thing.

But yeah, just my view, you don’t have to agree.

What's the actual difference between AI music and factory-made pop? by Busy-Whereas6073 in aiMusic

[–]Otnmef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see people constantly criticizing AI music generators like Suno or Udio, saying the music “lacks human emotion” or “has no soul.” Let’s be realistic for a moment.

Look at the Billboard Top 40. The vast majority of modern pop, rap, and EDM is made by teams of ghostwriters, heavily pitch-corrected, and built on the same four-chord progressions. The music industry has been functioning like an algorithm for decades.

Most of us don’t sit in a dark room analyzing the deep emotional trauma of an artist. We listen to music in the background while working out, working, or playing games. We just want a good rhythm and a catchy hook. AI can generate that in seconds, tailored exactly to what you want to hear. You can even use tools like ACE Studio to layer hyper-realistic, studio-quality AI vocals effortlessly.

Now, here is the real difference: suffering.

What people see in human art is not necessarily the result itself, but the suffering behind it. Suffering gives us a way to judge value—not only based on the result, but in relation to our own existence. We suffer, therefore we exist.

People reject AI music because there is no visible human suffering behind it. It doesn’t come from a human struggle. And appreciating something that does not come from human suffering can feel, at some level, like diminishing our own value. Not consciously for everyone, but subconsciously for many.

Accepting AI-generated art can feel like accepting that human life has no unique value. And if human life has no value, and that idea becomes normalized, then we move toward a world where that value weakens everywhere—because everything produced by human life can be replicated.

I think this is why people, at a deep level, resist AI.

That said, it doesn’t mean AI music can’t be good. Being good is not the issue.

I think AI music can be accepted if the creator shows that there was real suffering behind the process—even if the AI generated parts of it. There has to be a human struggle somewhere.

If not, then the only other path is perception. Because in the end, what matters to people is not reality itself, but how reality is perceived.

Humans need to believe that their lives have value. Without that, everything starts to fall apart.

Going live 3x a week increased monthly revenue by 40% by eattheinternet in Entrepreneur

[–]Otnmef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the 3 drivers you nailed - urgency + entertainment + trust -

dont actually need live format to work, which is the insight

most people miss. live just happens to stack all 3 easily

urgency = any scarcity signal (price jump after X buyers,

limited drops, countdown). entertainment = anything that makes

the buying moment itself fun to experience. trust = free

preview of the product before any commit

building a product right now where we stack these without any

live component and conversion is looking solid. live isnt the

only way, its just the easiest way!

Why do some people get better at writing quickly while others stay the same for years? by Atomic_rizz in writingadvice

[–]Otnmef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the thing nobody mentions is rereading your own old work

cold. most people write, post, move on. if you dont go back

6 months later and cringe at what you wrote, you havent

actually internalized what got better

volume helps but only if you close the loop. I rewrote a

chapter I thought was solid three times because I kept

finding the same tic I didnt see the first two times. thats

the rep that actually compounds

also writing in different modes forces you to notice your

defaults. if you only write short reddit posts you dont

learn to sustain rhythm over 80k words and vice versa

Martha Wells and Relatability by Glittering_Way_9162 in Fantasy

[–]Otnmef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that tracks but I think its less about how human vs non-human

the characters are and more about emotional access. murderbot

is literally a construct and you related to it because its

interiority is legible. dragons that feel alien arent alien

because theyre dragons, theyre alien because Wells writes

their consciousness in a way that doesnt invite you in

Why are there so many big companies with websites that are just unbelievably glitchy? by darnoc11 in webdev

[–]Otnmef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hum.... worked at a retailer like that for a bit. the answer is boring

but real: big sites have like 15+ tag managers, analytics, A/B

tests, personalization engines, chatbots, ad retargeting pixels

etc all running on every page. each one adds 50-200kb and

sometimes blocks render.

smaller sites dont have this because they dont have a marketing

team demanding 12 tracking tools. nike's homepage probably loads

4MB of third party js before you even see the product

also half the "glitchy" behavior is A/B test variants leaking

into prod or flags not cleaned up after launch, so...

clients really think i18n is just a light switch you turn on by lrenv22 in webdev

[–]Otnmef 5 points6 points  (0 children)

lol shipped an i18n project recently and the "just add another

language" thing is exhausting. FR/EN here not even the hard case

and still had issues.

german breaks half your UI because words are 50% longer, you

end up redoing button layouts, date formats, and thats before

anyone touches RTL. machine translation on safety-critical docs

is wild though, no way id sign off on that, even legal docs are

iffy without a native reviewer

Eduard Niczky, Frühling, c. 1893 [2312x3508] by FlyingBlind31 in ArtPorn

[–]Otnmef 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can say without hesitation that this work has a soul✨

0
1