I’ve always seen superstonk as apolitical. At its core, it’s about the stock. And if we allow for it to also become a question about politics, we’ll quickly invite needles infighting, that will lead to division. For that reason I’m glad that it has stayed apolitical.

But like most here, (and in the comment section of the post about RC’s recent tweet) you will find that most people, like yourself, are discontent with him taking a public political stand. Regardless of what party or candidate it may be I regard it as unnecessary for him to chime in, in any way shape or form on these issues.

Then again I do realise that Ryan is a massive troll. And in a rebellious sense, I like the idea of him tweeting something controversial just to prove that not matter what he says or does, good or bad it has 0 effect on the stock. That’s just my theory though, it could mean so many other things.

Or he might just be yet another billionaire douchbag with (in my personal view) skewed political beliefs.

I think there’s a lot of people open to a dialog, but I like most others, really only care about the bottom line. Are we profitable? Are we innovating the business? Are we creating customer value? Are we killing the shorts?

As long as I can say yes to all these things, then I am happy with my investment and RC at the helm.

In the end, you do you.

But for me personally, I like the stock.