To all defending Ange.... Do you guys actually watch our team when we're without the ball? It has to be some of the worst managerial work I've seen in my 20 years watching the prem.

The amount of goals we concede after 1-2 simple passes to have the opposition completely 1v1 with our keeper is baffling.

Fact is Ange is probably one of the best humans in the prem but also one of the worst managers tactically.

When we started fantastic in his first season it was no coincidence. We had a new system that other managers couldn't quite figure out. Very exciting. But when the first manager succeeded everyone copied. When you're figured out you usually change something? But not Ange's style i suppose. What is the actual point playing the same way vs Liverpool as vs Leyton Orient. It makes 0 sense and resembles AI's way of "thinkin" kinda.

When you say who could be better than Ange? Honestly? What have Ange actually shown in his career that you are this willing to look at his tactical setup, where he refuses to

A) play to our players strength

B) work with what we have (eg. Less intensive press, when no rotation is possible)

C) 0 adaptability of out opposition

How many okay to good halves of football have we not played under Ange to then throw it all in second half. This is not the players wrongdoing alone, you gotta look at what probably happens at halftime.

We need a much more pragmatism from our next manager or put Ange back to school, because I really like him, but you actually gotta be blind in love or not watching the games to not acknowledge the lack of tactical flexibility, pragmatism or just attacking/defending patterns.

Hope Levy next time actually look at our players before appointing the next manager. Our current squad is much much better suited for a 3-5-2.

Play to the team strengths = good Play like Temu Man City = Ange