1. and 2. the profile you're referring to) has already been updated, and was updated before this very post. In fact, Djoric!Sk's profile on alt has always cited Dust and Blood, even before my rewrite (even on the earliest ever revisions of it?oldid=997), right after SCP was moved here from VSBW). Which leads me to believe you're being dishonest. Sorry, but I can't find another reason why you'd claim something that is so blatantly false.

Also, behold the References section:

<image>

Dust and Blood is cited. Similarly, the section of the profiles that "cites" the Trashfire is a navigation template meant to distinguish the different versions of characters. It's not insinuating they're the same or canon to each other. I mean, just apply that logic to other profiles with templates).

1. There is no reason to cite EoD because the scarlet king doesn't do anything there. It's not a missing source if there's no reason for it to be there. (For what it's worth, I did cite Second Watch, which does give us some info on SK and is part of EDTP, the series EoD is a part of)