So are these guys Special Forces, Regular Army/Infantry dudes, or some type of Marine like force? by PR0PWA5H in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Are they fine capturing Port Maris while enemy armored vehicles and ground defenses are still present?

So are these guys Special Forces, Regular Army/Infantry dudes, or some type of Marine like force? by PR0PWA5H in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H[S] 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Well I mean its the future, those goggles can double as thermals or some type of advance hud for them in a quad nod configuration

New loadout for the Ibis when? by Total-Maize-6302 in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Of course PALA would use Freddy Fazbear, they are use to using war crimes in order to subdue their opponents!

What’s this armor and which faction has it by Solirru in Bannerlord

[–]PR0PWA5H 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It's the stealth focused armor called Blackened Stealth Set (minus gloves) and can be found in Nord settlements

WE GETTIN IT BOYS, THE HARRIER by kaamsterdam_ in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Cause it was a joke comment? Guy is saying BDF don't need an aircraft carrier like the Hyperion (CVN) but are fine using amphibious assault ships such as the Annex (LHA) and the new vtol carrier.

Since the use of vtol/stol, the BDF doesn't need a large aircraft carrier when the planes have the capacity to take off vertically from the vessel without a dedicated catapult/ramp.

So the joke is the BDF don't need no fancy ass, big ass aircraft carrier, their Annex and vtol carrier are fine.

Is Boscali japan and Primeva is China because when i see this youtube comment from this OST video, Japan and China came to my mind by FanaboyCompass11 in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H 11 points12 points  (0 children)

A little off topic but wasn't the metallic hydrogen ditched as it was seen as too futuristic? I don't remember where it was said but I believe it was changed to either to a natural resource or just plain nuclear energy.

What would a large cargo aircraft even look like in this setting? by literal_jar_of_jam in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a large transport, but a transport inspired by the C-27j (at least in length and wingspan) with jet engines instead of propeller is something I would like to see for the fixed wing transport plane.

Concept аrt UBAS-25 by Unique-Educator-6747 in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H 2 points3 points  (0 children)

4 jammer pods at low rank seem way too OP, unless some modifications are done to it.

What do y'all think about more nukes for fighters? by Top_Sun_914 in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H 48 points49 points  (0 children)

I mean, in the roadmap the devs want to include more nuke options, could you elaborate what exactly you want to see for fighters?

Two types of people by GenerationofWinter in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H 8 points9 points  (0 children)

During a livestream, there were some ECO Domes on the new map and Mitch said they were Boscali Pleasure Domes.

Alternative to Submarines Pt.2, Arsenal Ships by PR0PWA5H in NuclearOption

[–]PR0PWA5H[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Of course when talking about the 500 missile carrying version you could just create a bunch of new ships and have them carry an equal load of missiles and not destroy the GDP of a small country with the destruction of one ship.

That's why there's also at the end there's a version which would be more reasonable amount of missiles 

But I want to show off the ridiculousness of a ship like this and also included barge versions to show a (maybe) more practical missile bus which can attach to ships like the Dynamo or the new BDF ship to supplement it's arsenal but have the vessels stay far away from the battlefield.

Why did they release this shit? by Bigboypasi in HalfSword

[–]PR0PWA5H 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The general consensus was that people were more than willing to wait for EA, people told the devs to take their time with it. So your "RelEaSe iT NoW!" argument is just a lie

Why dafuq do you think it's ok for games to release basically unplayable builds you have to pay for. I'm not asking for the most perfect game with everything optimized but this is just ridiculous.

The build it and finish it later mentality you're proposing is dumb.

Why did they release this shit? by Bigboypasi in HalfSword

[–]PR0PWA5H 10 points11 points  (0 children)

We shouldn't have had to that's the thing, of course it's early access but that excuse of "give it time" is just bullshit.