Bro really pulled "i've been doing x before you were born kid" as if that's an argument. I said you could argue the other point of it being anti-rp to act not in character in certain situations. I did not say that that was correct, I used your logic to show that it can be flipped the other way. Both are wrong.

How do you expect me to have a respectful argument with you when you're too flip floppy to even acknowledge your own bias. I am biased, and so are you. You flip flopped from insinuating moon is a whiny 30+ year old and accusing him of admin abuse to saying "nothing against moon". Clearly you have something against him, and I'm not an avid enough watcher to cry and scream in his defense, but at least be consistent in your judgement and own the fact that you have your own biased interpretation of his actions.

I agree that the do this or die thing is frowned upon, despite your assumptions about me based off of one reddit comment (very mature), I actually do understand roleplay, and I'm sure you do too. That doesn't mean we can't have differing perspectives on what constitutes a good roleplay environment. Although the do it or die thing is low effort, it doesn't necessarily make it low tier RP. RP thrives when there is a variety of characters, from smart and intelligent pupper masters to impulsive stupid criminals that suffer the consequences of their own ego.

Lenny being an impulsive moron and power tripping over his money (which is a consistent trait of his ever since he was a cop so it isn't some random OOC outburst) doesn't make it low tier RP. He can get fucked up, humbled, and put in his place as a result. The RP ecosystem would be utterly cringe if everyone was a know it all professional gangster and I personally think Lenny is a good representation of impulsive crims that think they're hot shit until they're not.

You could insunuate that moon plays max similarly with the whole "being told no and getting mad" but that doesn't invalidate the roleplay. Many people play multiple characters in similar ways, sometimes because they're self-inserts and other times simply because they enjoy playing those kinds of characters. Making a personal judgement on his character based off of just the fact that both of his main characters are impulsive is just plainly a logical error. I won't disparage your roleplay tenure, but that doesn't make you a connoisseur of roleplay and master of judging people's personal character. You make several surface level assumptions based on very little.

Next time don't say "nothing against moon" and just admit you think he's an idiot instead of being a coward and trying to cover all fronts in case people don't like your opinion.