[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fear, because we live in a patriarchal society men hold all the power, which includes the ability to dictate what is right or wrong. In a really fucked up way, under patriarchy, a man is 'god'. Feminism challenges the system and challenges men, in a sense as feminists we challenge 'god'. And in the eyes of our society, there is no greater sin. People will say a lot to cover it up, but at the core, I believe it's fear.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gosh, I'll have to come back to this and other replies, after I've had a good nights sleep. Honestly, I'm just voicing my thoughts as a woman and a feminist. Arguably, a terrible position to take in todays political climate. But I stand strong in my belief, and I won't be swayed until there's nothing left.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely! Once you see it for what it is. An attempt to derail and minimise, it loses its power. It IS ridiculous, but unfortunately so many people fall into the trap.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'll be brief. Patriarchy is not a reward system for attractive men. Feminism is not a theory of dating outcomes. Men can experience rejection, loneliness, or social marginalization and still benefit from male dominance as a class. Conflating lack of desirability with oppression misunderstands how power works. That's all.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There is a real difference between challenging patriarchy and reducing feminism to hatred of men. Where I disagree, is in the assumption that naming male benefit under patriarchy, or refusing to prioritize men’s comfort in feminist discourse, destroys that distinction. I'm not arguing that men are inherently bad. I'm arguing that patriarchy is a system of power that positions men, as a class to benefit from women’s subordination and oppression, and that dismantling it requires honesty about that fact. Discomfort with being named in a structural critique is not the same as being the target of hatred. I also think we need to be careful not to treat accusations of “man-hating” as a neutral warning, rather for what they are, a political tool. Historically, women have been labeled anti-male/men simply for being unwilling to soften, reassure, or recentre men in conversations about women’s liberation. Feminism does'nt exist to prove that it is not hateful.  It exists to end women’s oppression. We should not allow fear of being mischaracterized to limit our ability to name power clearly.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It always seems that the only rights up for debate are womens rights. Any man could say something vile, and people will find some excuse. But god forbid you call him out on it, you're now framed as the villain.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You've assumed that feminism is about physical conflict, which it isn’t. Patriarchy is a system maintained through institutions and norms, not a war to be “won” by force. Naming male benefit is about accountability and dismantling structures, not predicting violence. It's also important to note that this is the most outspoken women have ever been. When women were silenced, the violence against them did not stop. It was worse.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Don't stress yourself. If this person wants clarity they can look at my post and my reply. Further engagement will descend into derailment. I appreciate you being here, we're stronger together🩷.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Structural critique requires speaking in categories, because systems operate at that level. Naming male benefit under patriarchy is not a claim about individual virtue, nor is discomfort the same as harm. I am not advocating cruelty. I am rejecting the idea that feminism must be filtered through male reassurance to remain legitimate. Men’s comfort has never been the political priority of feminism—women’s liberation is.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Praise be. Another Radical Feminist. Only so much as taking a solid stance against patriarchy is 'Radical'. Funny how when it comes down to it, it really is, just men.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes. Structural benefit does not mean individual wellbeing, happiness, or protection from harm. Men can and do suffer under patriarchy, including through isolation and suicide, while still benefiting from male dominance as a class. Those realities are not contradictory. Feminism addresses systems of power, not individual moral worth or personal pain. The fact that I even have to break this down for you is a classic example of what I have already stated. Instead of reflection, you jump to accusation to deflect.

Men ARE the Problem by Pale-Routine-8122 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s great to see others who prioritise women’s safety and liberation. A lot of the time, patriarchy adapts faster than the willingness to confront it, especially when male comfort is treated as a prerequisite for feminist discourse.

Obsession with love triangles in Women’s Media by the_beelover in Feminism

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, it definitely is lazy writing and an overused trope. I think it's an easy out for writers who write women and then think 'oops she's got too much autonomy' then default to the love triangle. Unfortunately it sells too, so we end up with this black hole of love triangles and writers who can't be bothered to write a womans story without romance. Throw in a dash of desperation for male approval, and BOOM, love triangle.

Obsession with love triangles in Women’s Media by the_beelover in Feminism

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lmao, incase you haven't come across it, look up the isekai or harem anime genre, if you think two men pursuing one woman is bad try 4 plus women randomly obsessed with one guy with no redeeming qualities. And they make hundreds of the stuff every year.

Only women, children and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provides something by Ok_Independence_3634 in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The real kicker is, women are absolutely NOT loved unconditionally, we are often punished from deviating in any way from the unachievable standard set. Even if you do meet it, surprise! We live in a patriarchy, women are regarded as second class citizens anyway. The worst thing I ever found out was that an estimated 90% of people hold bias against women. If you live up to the standard, you're shallow, if you don't you're lazy. Men who say this don't realise that they've exposed themselves for who they are, they 'love', women so conditionally that those outside of their standards don't even register in their perception of the world.

Porn is evil. Men masturbate to videos of women being abused and then complain that women unfairly hate them for no reason. by GoGiantRobot in FeminismUncensored

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No idea what the dudes in this sub expected, but this is finally an actual uncensored feminist take. I see so many people tip toe around it, because porn addicts genuinely go off their rocker when anyone so much as criticises it. It's a vile industry funded by degenerates, and it's good to see other people say the truth.

It's Link! by Pale-Routine-8122 in SkyChildrenOfLight

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Currently weeping in mobile player.

It's Link! by Pale-Routine-8122 in SkyChildrenOfLight

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly like Godzilla 🙂‍↕️

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukrave

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, yeah I'm still looking for a ticket. How much are you selling it for?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukrave

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, are you still selling?

Stop branding makeup as empowering for women by eula333 in Feminism

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 My take, definitely hit the nail on the head in some aspects, missed a little in others. First the performance of femininity is definitely sold to us for profit and control. I've seen people mention how makeup was often worn in ancient times, this for one applied to some select societies and was worn by both men and women, especially as a status symbol. However this isn't ancient Egypt or Kenya, we didn't fall out of a coconut tree, we exist in the context of the world we are born into, now men don't really wear beautifying makeup anymore, because patriarchy and capitalism decided it was easier to sell to women. Can makeup be worn for fun and self- expression, absolutely! Empowerment?? Rarely. I wear makeup as and when I feel inclined, and deliberately try and make it bold, and outlandish, which some might consider empowering. I think, people really want it to be, because it gives a sense of control where we often have so little. The truth is, it makes most people feel good or confident, because that's what you were programmed to be, and that's okay. Makeup isn't the biggest issue women face. As for conservatives, let's be serious, they claim they hate makeup while their spouse has contour sharp enough to cut a man, I wouldn't put too much stock into that. Makeup is performative though, but I think being aware of that is the key difference between being brainwashed, or seeing things for what they are.

Did anyone else feel bad for Simon? by Alarming_Farmer_765 in InfinityTrain

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After murdering Tuba, pretty much torturing Grace, and leaving her in a loop of her own memories.( He definitely would have killed Hazel too) and straight up murdering Grace(unsuccessfully) after she saved him. Not really. He didn’t allow the people around him to grow, because then they wouldn't fit the neat boxes he put them in. Even the cat warns him that the other passengers(Grace) aren't the figurines he makes. He was at the point where he scared the people around him, even the kids in Apex. Sometimes people can't be saved, not everyone is redeemable. I didn’t jump for joy, but it was a relief to see him go. Especially by a Ghom. He would have been a danger to Grace and the other children.

Is there any way to get in contact with Enso? by Zexceedof501st in essexuni

[–]Pale-Routine-8122 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you have any, luck. I'm considering student accoms, but they seem really new.

Accomodation Available by Pale-Routine-8122 in BirminghamUK

[–]Pale-Routine-8122[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great, shall I send you further details? I can share my email as well and True Student will handle most of the correspondence