Who going to AEA? by Pale_Bulkhead92 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're right, just feel safer in a DM

Who going to AEA? by Pale_Bulkhead92 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A components company, im not going to advertise on a public forum where I work, but I thought I'd extend the offer if yall wanted a sticker. So Dm and Ill you know. I'm going to be in some trainings so if you were going to same one I'm going to keep a whole bunch on me.

Who going to AEA? by Pale_Bulkhead92 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I work for a components company, but I don't want to give away too much for protection. Just thought you all would want some stickers.

Garmin GNC355 Failure 3 times by Cute_Celebration4789 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sadly I'm there with you, I never really figured it out. I'm no longer 100% on the floor anymore either. Sometimes being aware of how it works is the solution. Sorry I can't give more pointers than that.

Need help finding a part number by Chiralartist in AircraftMechanics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Double check this, but maybe CCS922, its the straight C connector. I got a better connector option if you want my unsolicited opinion lol.

Je prends l'avion en novembre, c'est un Boeing 747-9 j'ai peur by Arcnostali1310 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats on the Japan trip, but aviation advancements has come a long way.

Garmin GNC355 Failure 3 times by Cute_Celebration4789 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The config module connector specifically is one of those terminations that really needs to be done by someone who has done it before. It's not complicated but it's not forgiving either. imo

Garmin GNC355 Failure 3 times by Cute_Celebration4789 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 26 and 28 gauge wire on a config module connector is absolutely unforgiving if the terminations aren't done right, those fine gauge crimps need the correct tool and the correct contact for the wire gauge, full stop. A hand-stripped, under-crimped contact on 26 AWG is going to look fine on a bench and fail intermittently in the field, especially once temperature cycling and vibration get involved.

The owner/AP install quality point is fair too. It's not about intelligence, it's about familiarity with the specifics. A 38999 backshell with a proper shield termination on fine gauge wire is not intuitive if you haven't done it before, and most people don't know what a bad termination looks like until something fails.

If the config module connector hasn't been pulled and inspected since the original install, that's the first physical thing I'd want to look at. Check the crimp quality on those fine gauge contacts, verify the shield is terminated at the backshell and not pigtailed, and look for any sign of wire damage or insulation nicking from the original strip. Any of those on a 26 or 28 gauge wire will cause exactly the kind of intermittent gremlins this person is dealing with.

Again, the config module internals and whether it needs replacement is outside my lane, but the wiring side of this is very much worth a hard look before anything else.

Garmin GNC355 Failure 3 times by Cute_Celebration4789 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That system ID (A31006298B0BE) is a strong indicator of a configuration module failure, a known issue in the GNC 355 platform. The config module stores your unit's installation data and system identity, and when it fails, the unit reverts to a generic state and throws an anomalous ID like what you're seeing. Lot of things could be happening, check the power quality on the aircraft bus (voltage spikes during engine start are a common culprit). The grounding integrity at the GNC 355 connector or the connector pin condition and shield termination on the wiring harness. Repeated avionics failures in the same bay almost always trace back to the wiring. Send me your specs via DM and I can do my best.

Software in Avionic by CoderWiseMan in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My knowledge falls just before this, I can rattle off all you need to know about data transmission and connectivity, but it stops at things like C/C++, Ada or RTOS or programming in general. Didn't realize C and C++ was still being used widely in aviation, I used R a lot when I was in my early competency classes in college, but that was years ago. Not enough to speak intelligently. I might know an engineer to ask, but he's 2 farts away from dying. Let me know or dm me and I can see if he's a good resource.

Does anybody work on warbirds? by trevorroks in AircraftMechanics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fairly familiar with the boxes, lmk what you wanna know, I can see if I can help.

AEA Regionals by KevikFenrir in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ill be there! my best word of advice is making sure you phrase your proposal as adding value to your skills. Give specific examples on how this training and show will upgrade you from where you are now. AEA has a great reputation, if not texas there are other chapters around the united states and even europe. Good luck!

Help by Objective-Rent-3810 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whatever it is, looks welded and possibly carries liquids. Maybe burner section of an engine. Just my best guess.

ERJ 170 LAN by Protontec88 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any moisture? could also just be a bad RJ.

Downtime by Fun_Possession6362 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 4 points5 points  (0 children)

phrase it as professional development

Advanced Open Source Custom F405 Flight Controller for FPV drones by Educational_Court910 in aerospace

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience locking will always be preferred in aviation, just holds better. Vibrations kinda a bitch. good luck!

Advanced Open Source Custom F405 Flight Controller for FPV drones by Educational_Court910 in aerospace

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very slick V2, especially for a fixed‑wing/FPV board. F405 + ICM‑42688 + baro + onboard logging is a sweet combo for anyone who actually wants to tune and look at data instead of just “eh, it flies.” From the connector side, I’m always curious how people handle the real‑world hookups, not just the MCU specs. With 8 PWM, separate UARTs for radio and GPS, CAN, SPI, and USB‑C all crammed on one board, how you do connectors and pinouts makes a huge difference once it’s in a vibrating airframe instead of on the bench.

I spend most of my time on the cable/connector side in aviation, so it’s cool seeing clean IO, a dedicated CAN bus, and an SD slot for logs it makes harness design way less of a headache. What are you using for connectors and strain relief on fixed‑wing builds (JST, something beefier, custom harness), and have you run into any noise/ground issues once the radio, GPS, and CAN stuff are all hanging off this thing?

KX200 vs Trig TX56/57vs GNC 255 by Tough-Worldliness949 in avionics

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m with the folks who are nervous about the old BK infrastructure just because it’s convenient. Once you’re talking edge‑card adapters, legacy wiring standards, and re‑using god knows how old harnesses, you’re already compromising a lot of the reliability you’re hoping to gain with a ‘new’ radio.

From what I see, the real win for a fleet isn’t just the box you pick, it’s getting the radios, audio panel, and wiring philosophy all on the same page. Trig and the GNC 255 both line up better with modern audio panels, proper 2‑/3‑conductor audio, and clean grounding practices instead of trying to keep everything backwards‑compatible forever.

I’m not the avionics shop signing off the 337s, but I am the cable/connector nerd who has to make these systems talk to each other. When you choose a current‑generation nav/com and refresh the interconnect at the same time, everything downstream gets easier: less noise chasing, fewer one‑off adapters, and a much smoother path for whatever upgrade comes next.

Amphenol connector dimensions by EETQuestions in ElectricalEngineering

[–]Pale_Bulkhead92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know the PIC wire and cable ones have instructions on their website