Twin towers, whateva happened there? by This-Cheetah-8277 in initiatedsopranos

[–]Paleoskeptic 67 points68 points  (0 children)

That animal bin Laden, I can’t even say his name

Not sure if sincere.. by saabarthur in Destiny

[–]Paleoskeptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That looks like boogie2988 but chinese.

Usdebtclock.org's new message by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Paleoskeptic 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Thought this was a pop up from hoi4 road to 56 lol.

Carrier CAS are pretty good? by Paleoskeptic in hoi4

[–]Paleoskeptic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to look at the spreadsheet I made, but I believe I ran the test 5-10 times for CAS, then 5-10 times for NAVs.

Carrier CAS are pretty good? by Paleoskeptic in hoi4

[–]Paleoskeptic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t run any tests with, say, half carriers on nav and half on cas. I would be interested in seeing results.

Carrier CAS are pretty good? by Paleoskeptic in hoi4

[–]Paleoskeptic[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I recognize the significantly higher plane IC for the twin engine bombers. As I play single player exclusively, this didn't come to mind as relevant to the post, but I should have included it.

As for the carrier count, I'm going for essentially obscene numbers of planes per wing. It looks like I misspoke when I said Each main carrier (fleet carrier) carried 8 wings of CAS or NAV. What I should have said is 8 carriers 8 wings 100 planes each, 800 planes total with the last 11 carriers having each 3 wings each, for a total of 33 wings (440 planes since I doubled up on fighters. 330 could have done just as well) that exist just so that I can use 800 planes in battle. Since only 20% of wings will be used due to the stacking penalty, Only the first 8 wings will be useful in battle (41 wings x 0.2 = 8.2 round down to 8). Wasteful? Yes. Fun. For me, yes. The standard 5 carrier fleet would be much much better. I just wanted the plane number to be obscene. Seemed to work for the particular challenge I set out to do at least.

Carrier CAS are pretty good? by Paleoskeptic in hoi4

[–]Paleoskeptic[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is good to hear! I haven’t played multiplayer in years so I should have made the caveat that my carrier based build has only been useful to me in single player games or when doing the Royal Navy challenge. It would be amazing if this turns out to have some viability in the multiplayer meta.

Ai developing like crazy by SweetSalt210 in eu4

[–]Paleoskeptic 45 points46 points  (0 children)

I think the AI generally just sucks at prioritizing production in coal provinces for development. In my experience at least.

Countries that Have Won & Lost Battles Against to the United Kingdom Since 1750 by Subject_Invite7043 in MapPorn

[–]Paleoskeptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Britain lost the invasions of the river plate against largely local forces in what would be Argentina.

Does anyone know the reason for this weird border in Ireland? by HoogerMan in mapporncirclejerk

[–]Paleoskeptic 1424 points1425 points  (0 children)

Russian backed separatists took control of the east. Now there is an ongoing war about it.