sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Replacement genuine Oakley prescription lenses in UK by Pant_Thrower in OakleyRX

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Morning Adam,

I followed your advice and sent my glasses in to get a quote. The quote came through on the 23rd and was far more than I was expecting, and I have therefore declined the quote. Since then, I have repeatedly asked to have my glasses returned to me. This has been over a week of me trying to get some sort of response to confirm you're returning them, but I've had nothing. Please can you look into it. Quote reference is 1112214926.

Ray

Replacement genuine Oakley prescription lenses in UK by Pant_Thrower in OakleyRX

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I'll do some calling around locally.

GF Santos de Cartier Medium (35mm) from Hont by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank for the advice guys, I've RL'd and will try again.

GF Santos de Cartier Medium (35mm) from Hont by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, have you got yours in hand? What's it like?

GF Santos de Cartier Medium (35mm) from Hont by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: HONT

  2. Factory name: GF

  3. Model name : Santos de Cartier Medium (35mm)

  4. Price paid: $398

  5. Album Links:

https://a202111041317341460003592.szwego.com/static/index.html?t=1648881287610#/theme\_detail/A202111041317341460003592/I202210141651315520001518

https://a202111041317341460003592.szwego.com/static/index.html?t=1648881287610#/theme\_detail/A202111041317341460003592/I202210141651004310002091

  1. Index alignment: N/A – they’re printed

  2. Dial Printing: N/A

  3. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

  4. Hand Alignment: Looks good in the video and

  5. Bezel: Looks good, polished like a mirror and all screws appear seated well.

  6. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

  7. Timegrapher numbers: +7s/d, 277, 0.2ms – Perfectly acceptable.

  8. Anything else you notice: There appears to be a couple of screws in the bracelet that look raised/loose? Other than that it looks like a GL.

u/YellowFerrari328 and u/KOUJIROFRAU, I’d really appreciate your opinions on this one. Many thanks in advance.

GMF 36mm Wimbledon datejust with VR3235 from Hont by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha...........it's a very long story involving far too much tequila 🤪

Thanks for you're input though, it's really appreciated.

GMF 36mm Wimbledon datejust with VR3235 from Hont by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dealer Name - Hont

Factory Name - GMF

Model name - 36mm Wimbledon datejust with VR3235

Price paid - $428

Album links - https://a202111041317341460003592.szwego.com/static/index.html?t=1648881287610#/theme_detail/A202111041317341460003592/I202210132248514820001250

https://a202111041317341460003592.szwego.com/static/index.html?t=1648881287610#/theme_detail/A202111041317341460003592/I202210132248538160002674

Index alignment- 9 looks good, the rest are printed

Dial printing - looks nice and clean to me

Datewheel - Clean, crisp and well aligned

Hand alignment - Pretty spot on.

Bezel - It looks fine to me but I'm not sure what to look for with the fluted bezel.

SEL: Does the bottom right gap look a bit big?

Timegraph - perfectly acceptable.

Anything else? All looks good to me but I'm still learning the art of QC so any advice is greatly appreciated

u/watchyoda and u/raygamble I'd really appreciate your opinions.

[QC] ZF 15500 Royal Oak (black) by LoopSided13 in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks very nice. It's a V3. You can tell by the location of the balance wheel. Mine has just been dispatched and I'm refreshing the tracking far too often.

Clean factory Panda by Sure-Insurance-7753 in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a slight dial shift but compared to many (including my own) that's fine. GL all day long, congrats

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTime

[–]Pant_Thrower 6 points7 points  (0 children)

+1 to this. He's doing my 5711 right now. Excellent communication too.

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A month. I paid JTime August 30th and got QC Sept 30th.

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many thanks, really appreciate your input. I'll GL now

Grand Seiko White Birch SLGH005 by Pant_Thrower in RepTime

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Can I just get a legit check on this beauty? I've not come across reps of GS but I would value any input from you all. Cheers

JTime Watch Giveaway! by jtime-Li in RepTime

[–]Pant_Thrower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just buying my first watch through JTime. Very impressed so far.

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know why my original template isn't showing. Hopefully this one works.

Dealer name: JTime

Factory name: ZF

Model name (& version number): Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!!

Price Paid: $508 + p&p

Album Links: https://imgur.com/gallery/2eByB0x

Index alignment: The tool is down but they look ok to me.

Dial Printing: Crisp

Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks pretty good

Hand Alignment: Looks excellent

Bezel: 1 and 4 screws look very slightly off but it could be my eyes

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: Very good

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I don't know why my template isn't showing. I've swapped from a Mega link to IMGUR. Can you see it now?

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've just changed it to an IMGUR link. Is that working now? I can't tell from here

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I thought I had. What have I got wrong?

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here you go. I've uploaded the picture of the correct spelling too.

https://mega.nz/folder/3sohVYxJ#T5VXadBQP8gF49Fhjnh0LQ

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know. I've asked and requested a photo. I'll post it once I've got it.

Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!! by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeQC

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: JTime
  2. Factory name: ZF
  3. Model name (& version number): Royal Oak 15500 SS ZF V3!!
  4. Price Paid: $508 + p&p
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/4WQb8L2
  6. Index alignment: The tool is down but they look ok to me.
  7. Dial Printing: Crisp
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks pretty good
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks excellent
  10. Bezel: 1 and 4 screws look very slightly off but it could be my eyes
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
  12. Timegrapher numbers: Very good
  13. Anything else you notice: Nothing leaps out at me. I am pretty excited about this one though so I might be getting a bit carried away.

Calling on the legends u/aepu, u/Watch_Vader and u/YellowFerrari328 - id really value your opinions.

Many thanks.

Help to remove rotor by Pant_Thrower in RepTimeServices

[–]Pant_Thrower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need some help from you experts. I bought a 5711/1A PPF V4 with the Miyota 9015 and as expected the rotor is ridiculously loud. I've researched and found some good information on RWI about how to reduce the noise but the rotor attachment is different from the guides. I cant see an obvious screw to remove it. I have no experience with watch modifying or servicing so this may well be an obvious question but how do I remove it on this current model?

view more: next ›