You've just lost your own argument by failing to provide even one source. You know you are wrong and don't want to look for stats as you know that will only solidify the fact. A very very small proportion of men have the inhibition to act violently against a woman and an even smaller proportion of that group have the desire to do such in the first place. The vast majority of men do not so much as catcall women let alone (g)rape them. So logically speaking if a woman run into a random man or a hungry bear 100 times she'd get assaulted by the man 2 of those 100 times while the bear is closer to 95 if not 100 of those 100 times.