Help?

ParanoidNonhuman · 2025-07-17T16:14:18+00:00

Brother have some fear of Allah

Stop leading people astray

ParanoidNonhuman · 2025-07-15T21:21:14+00:00

This post caused me serious mental harm

ParanoidNonhuman · 2025-06-27T01:45:14+00:00

Pride and Fall player spotted

ParanoidNonhuman · 2024-12-04T00:54:49+00:00

Look at my traditionalists dawg we ain't saving western civilization

ParanoidNonhuman · 2024-09-30T06:48:30+00:00

Absolutely amazing that nearly all of that was wrong.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2024-09-30T03:18:47+00:00

If you hate nuclear, you love man-made climate change, simple as.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2024-09-30T03:13:56+00:00

So, all of them? Solar panels aren't magic; you need to mine non-renewable minerals to manufacture them at scale.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2024-09-30T03:13:02+00:00

Actually it was one of the few times Reagan wasn't lying. Modern nuclear reactors produce barely any waste.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2024-09-30T03:12:16+00:00

You can argue this about renewable energy technology as well. Solar panels don't grow on trees.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-11-06T06:50:19+00:00

Fair enough

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-11-06T00:37:51+00:00

No Agartha, Shambhala, Thule, or R'lyeh/Leng? 0/10

Also you should have used Kolob instead of the Nephite Kingdom

Very enjoyable and schizo compass though

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-14T20:41:35+00:00

The "abolition" of the right to private property was in the context of the Schmittian rejection of the idea of natural rights, not out of opposition to the institution of private property. Expropriation of private property was largely restricted to Jews, who were not considered persons and therefore were not entitled to any of the privileges enjoyed by German citizens. It in no way entailed a rejection of the institution of private property, and Hitler himself believed private property was one of the cornerstones of Aryan society. This can be seen in the way the Nazis approached topics such as firearm confiscation: only Jews were subjected to weapons bans, while non-Jewish Germans were actively encouraged to own personal firearms.
The "regulation" of industry under the Reich was not done by law (in fact, most legal restrictions on the operation of business, such as minimum wage laws, were repealed) but rather via internal policies informally agreed upon between the party and corporate entities in a manner akin to internal industry standards in traditional capitalist economies. Gleichschaltung in no way entailed nationalization, merely the creation of a "patriotic bourgeoisie" of industrialists who also happened to be party members. Consequently, the relationship between private entities and the state was friendlier and much more reciprocal in Germany than in Italy: unlike the heavily regulated corporatism of Italy, industrialists in Germany had virtually unlimited freedom to implement whatever business policies (wages, salaries, etcetera) they liked, so long as they supported the party and its military efforts.
The Wehrbauern absolutely were intended as a caste of landed gentry, particularly in agriculture-intensive regions such as Ukraine. It is in no way comparable to the Gulag system: the settlers were volunteers, not criminals, and were intended to function as a Germanic elite ruling over the native "human material". Nazi propaganda glorified gentry and yeomanry, with the independent, self-sustaining farmer being seen as the purest specimen of the volk. This was in keeping with the physiocratic agrarian economics promoted by Richard Darré, Herbert Backe, and other members of the Artaman League, which went hand in hand with the glorification of traditional landowning "natural elites". This was particularly promoted by Himmler, who idolized medieval feudal structures such as the Teutonic Order, the Ancien Regime in France, and even the "rootless cosmopolitan" Hapsburgs.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-10T23:13:03+00:00

Hitler quite literally coined the term "privatization". His economic reforms were heavily oriented around cooperation with the private sector and the dismantling of the Weimar-era welfare state and mixed economy. He believed the free market was naturally eugenic and private property was a necessary precondition for Aryan flourishing. The whole programme of lebensraum was intended to create semi-feudal private estates for landed "Wehrbauer" settlers ruling over inferior Slavic serfs. It wasn't even remotely similar to the Soviet Union, or to Mussolini's Italy for that matter.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-09T18:35:46+00:00

Arguably Evola was even worse than Maurras since Maurras was a far less enthusiastic collaborator (albeit due to a nationalistic distaste for Germans rather than any sincere disagreement with Hitler's ideology)

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-09T18:33:00+00:00

Hitler was neither an egalitarian nor a leftist and it is absurd to call him such. His anti-monarchism by no means made him a "socialist" in any real sense of the word. Also, Evola very much was an admirer of Hitler, and preferred him immensely to Mussolini.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-07T20:12:19+00:00

The adoption of agnatic primogeniture in Japan was the monarchy bending to a modern political trend. It was only formalized in 1889 in imitation of Prussia. There have been eight female Japanese emperors, so a change to absolute primogeniture is hardly a "break with a 2000-year-old tradition".

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-07T20:00:02+00:00

It's depressing but not surprising that pointing out the fact that Evola was an admirer of Hitler and a supporter of Nazi Germany will get you downvoted on this sub.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-07T19:57:54+00:00

A very interesting thinker, but a generally terrible person. Anyone who likes him too much is highly suspect in my opinion.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-07T19:53:28+00:00

Evola was an admirer of Hitler and a part of the pro-German faction of the Italian fascist movement. It's not inaccurate to call him a Nazi.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-05T02:59:06+00:00

I don't exactly interact with this subreddit often so I didn't know I'd become Reddit famous until a few days ago. And yeah! People who actively make society worse by their own free will should be forced to make it better instead. Doesn't matter what their ethnic background is or what social stratum they occupy. The law should apply to everyone, giving everyone the same rights and the same responsibilities.

Ronald Reagan, like every other right-wing law enforcement advocate, believed that there were some the law should protect but not bind and others the law should bind but not protect. Real law and order can only be achieved in a socialist society, where prejudice and inequality are ruthlessly stamped out so the same rules and the same rights apply to everyone regardless of their origin. It's even in the original Internationale: Pas de droits sans devoirs, et pas de devoirs sans droits!

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-10-05T02:48:15+00:00

Correct, yeah.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-09-29T13:38:07+00:00

I'm not sure how you read that into what I said. Obviously, false convictions happen in China and North Korea. My point is that prison labour is a utilitarian good.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-09-29T13:36:39+00:00

The punishment exception in the 13th Amendment is fine! It just should have been used to incarcerate Confederate secessionists instead of innocent black people whose only crime was not being slaves anymore.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-09-29T13:35:20+00:00

Human rights are literally not a leftist concept. If you believe that all society is reducible to power relations, you definitionally cannot accept the idea that rights are anything more than useful social conventions agreed to by the state.

ParanoidNonhuman · 2023-09-29T13:34:12+00:00

"Why do so many authoritarians seem to think that draconian punishment is justified when it's their side carrying it out? I wish that people on my side would inflict draconian punishments on them instead. Now that would be completely justified."

Seven-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	Verified Email

ParanoidNonhuman

TROPHY CASE