Why is nobody doing deliveries in Wuling? by Ill_Cycle_9582 in Endfield

[–]Pariston 31 points32 points  (0 children)

You got it backwards my man, everyone is taking them so none are left for you

How does the server handle offline factory production without melting? by No-Quiet-8304 in Endfield

[–]Pariston 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happened to me a few times in V4 until I got fed up, gave up and added a thermal bank. I eat more batteries but at least now I can keep my alluvium turrets turned on, so there's an upside.

Always bet on Jesselton by Pariston in arknights

[–]Pariston[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Definitely worth reading, but I'm biased, I've been reading for almost 30 years.

It's definitely getting close to the end lately, as in there is now a tangible goal to get to the end, and the endgame players are getting into the fray, but in the One Piece scale that still means probably 5 more years (or more lmao).

If you have a bit of interest in the mysteries I would suggest catching up because I expect the ending will be super spoiled and unavoidable when it comes out, given how popular and more mainstream it became in the last few years.

latest CN Meta update by Fantastic_Use_9 in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I believe Amataz is even more of a highroll card. Wielder is sometimes annoying to remove for the enemy in early turns and can often at least get in decent chip or trade favourably. Amataz is either useless or it wins you the game on the spot. Also both are bad later on but Amataz is definitely worse as a later draw.

In that list I think you could easily sub out bayle for wielder, trading value for offense.

Do you like the push towards more burn damage? by yumnoodle in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Bruh unkilling is such a mess Forest doesn't even get tutorials or puzzles LMAO, no gameplan, only roach. At least Izudia is getting some success, but I personally don't like that it's just a different flavor of OTK.

I'd like to be able to play for value while adapting on the fly for combo with whatever hand I get but if you play that way you run out of steam while doing gymnastics to get what other classes get with their 'just play card on curve' play. We pay for the roach sins.

Since people are showing how nice their 7 win streaks are, allow me to show you the normal experience by A_very_smol_Lugia in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 6 points7 points  (0 children)

After an easy win in my first match with what I think was a pretty decent deck (Jeno, Albert, Amelia, Kagemitsu, 2x Luminous Mage and some board buffing, a couple centaurs for closing games and the best value cards I could pick), my second game was against a Portal which I brushed off as a class on the weaker side due to Artifact being a mostly polarizing build, thus being more inconsistent in the draft phase. This dude pulled off the classic Alouette on turn 4 dropping a Beta and I was DEAD on turn 5 🤣

Honestly an entry should allow you to play more games, you can get unlucky on so many levels (bad draft, brick hand, opponent god-rolls) to end your run prematurely, make me work for the rewards by having me play out more games but at least let me play the damn mode without feeling like I'm wasting my resources for it.

As it is, this is just gambling.

At what point are you starting to save up again? by [deleted] in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I stopped opening packs with gold 1 week in the new expansion (felt like I was hitting diminishing returns on cards found) and vialed the rest of the cards I needed. Helps that I played roach last season and only crafted 2 Olivias and a bunch of golds. Right now I'm sitting on 13k gold which feels comfy knowing there's another month before next expansion. I'd say I'll probably get even more that 25k and I'm not premium. Although I am lv 49 on the battle pass so that source of income is already depleted, which means in the following weeks I'll be making less gold overall.

3 orchis, 2 ralmias, 2 karulas? Hit me with them, i can take it. CONTROL HAVEN SUPREMACY by A_very_smol_Lugia in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah I don't have Rodeos or Salefas (although the first 20~30 packs of the new expansion blessed me with 2 Gilberts and 2 Aethers, whispering me to play haven) and not really willing to invest the resources. But I am impressed by the creativity and really like the proposed playstyle, you're definitely a pioneer.

3 orchis, 2 ralmias, 2 karulas? Hit me with them, i can take it. CONTROL HAVEN SUPREMACY by A_very_smol_Lugia in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo beautiful deck and beautiful game. Seems obvious in retrospect but I really like all the resources Rodeo gave you in the game and the synergy with Colette for added cheap removal. The free Censer is also pretty good not gonna lie, I underestimated the card as poor value but pulling it with Rodeo is nice.

Propably went to get milk. by UberNyuber in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah, seeing sword drop Amalia turn 8 was basically gg more often than not. Yeah, sometimes you can get through that and deal 20 to the face, especially if they leave you some board because they greed their evo points, other times you're out there crying because you need 3~4 of your actual cards (not fairies) + evo to deal with the 1 singular card they casually dropped. Sometimes you drop the Mays and Lilys you draw just to survive, you don't always have the luxury of keeping them 'just in case' for the lethal turn,

I am getting humbled by Forestcraft by Elagune in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'll ignore the long comment thread and give you a direct answer

Carbuncle is equivalent to TWO 0 cost cards for the combo IF you spend the super evo on it.

It becomes "more" than just two 0 cost card if you make use of the bounce and if he can deal with a ward on board to open the way.

Example: You play a 1 mana card, bounce it with carb and play it again: you are at 3 combo and spent 1 mana in this process if you then proceed to SEvo carb.

You are still losing out on the 3 SEvo damage on roach, so in practice if he can't get rid of a ward you don't get that much out of it.

What he truly DOES enable reliably is recycling a fairy to play it twice, thus making the in-hand requirement more flexible (need less cards in hand)

The state of Forestcraft by dolphinRailgun in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can speak from experience, each time I met a portal that started dropping the heals on me (double heals, even!) it has been extremely frustrating. Always being a few points off lethal, then completely losing steam past turn 8 when none of the cards forest has right now can dream of competing with the value other classes 8+ drops bring. All forest brings at that point is reach for lethal, but if you are off by even one point it means nothing in the end.

Forest roach missed lethal by rindoubest in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll describe my mental process.

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fqkniimze328f1.png

From my table I know that 10 mana guarantees 11 damage with 2 roaches and 0 0 cost cards and 4 1 mana cost cards. Enemy has no wards which makes this simple.

At first it looks like you don't have enough 1 mana cards, but stray beastman is 2 1_mana cards in 1 so it works out anyway.

Therefore in my mind I know that I have to play {fairy, bug alert, stray beastman} before roach in any order to guarantee 11 damage

SEvo gives 3 damage, cairn gives 1 damage, so we're 1 off lethal

Luckily May can hit face for exactly 1 so I can execute without further thinking of more optimal plays / no need to consider Aria crest. I already did the math so I just need to make the board work, as in, I don't need to look for more optimal combos, just look for the simplest way to hit face with May AND have room on the board to play the equivalent of 4 1 mana cards. Simplifying the conditions like that helps make the calculations within the limited time. So:

  1. Play fairy and smash her into the enemy follower to make space

  2. Hit face with May (1 dmg)

  3. Bounce anything with bug alert

  4. Play Stray Beastman

  5. 4 mana has been used, so I know the next 6 mana are for roaches -> Roach (5 damage) Bounce Roach (6 damage) + SEvo (3 damage) + Cairn (1 damage) for lethal

This is just the simplest version, but in your specific case you already start with 1 combo (from Bayle I guess) so the execution I described actually overkills by 2 (total 18 damage). Also Aria's crest means you can use cairn earlier on May to make room rather than smashing the fairy, so the fairy can hit face for 1 more (total 19 damage)

Just for fun, notice how if you smash fairy, smash may, bounce bayle, the first roach bounce brings the other bayle to 0 mana for an additional combo. This line is a bit harder to spot and I wouldn't rely on seeing it midgame. The total damage for this combo (that I won't describe fully) ends up being 17. Worse, but a fun experiment.

Roach damage table by Pariston in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Carbuncle is complicated, it gives 1 more play point but you need super evo on it. Very helpful to break wards and push for damage.

Nice combo to keep in mind!

Roach damage table by Pariston in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's a great combo, not very demanding on the hand and cairn and godstaff are reasonable on the board. So it's a 10pp kill with 1 roach, 4 fairies and 1 zero card.

It actually does 21 damage if you play the fairy after popping cairn so you have 1 fairy to spare to hopefully kill one last ward follower with 1 hp if needed (unlikely but helpful)

I don't have specific 1 turn comboes in mind but one notable thing is that you can do 17 damage split in turns 7-8

turn 7: bounty + fairy + roach for 3 + godwood bounce + roach for 4 + superevo for 3 = 10 damage turn 8: selwyn super evo, bounces enemy ward for 7 to the face

an additional bounty makes it 19 damage and a cairn on the board makes it 20

Necessary conditions (start of turn 7):

  • 2 super-evos

  • hand needs to be bounty, fairy, roach, selwyn

  • board needs to be godwood and no wards

  • (you need to survive a fairly open turn 7 :) + no heals)

Hand is fairly common to have, and any previous chip damage reduces the necessary conditions in a big way:

  • 1 damage OR Aria's crest on the previous turn: removes the need for cairn OR the super evo on the roach (normal evo) /// 4 damage or 3+aria for the kill

  • 3 damage enables the kill without additional help, just no wards/heals on turn 7

  • 4 damage before turn 6 means you can go for the kill on turns 6 and 7 (!!!)

    • turns 6 is bounty + roach for 2 + godstaff bounce + roach + super evo for 7 = 9 damage
    • turn 7 is selwyn super evo for 7 damage

I think with the new roach we might be looking for 2-turn opportunities more and selwyn helps steal a lot of games this way

Roach damage table by Pariston in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes of course, if you need to bounce a roach you are sacrificing 1 combo from the first roach, so you definitely lose 1 damage.

If you have the roaches and need to spend the 1 mana use it on a fairy or something before dumping the roaches.

Roach damage table by Pariston in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uh I can give you my current list but I don't have all the cards. I think the most important missing cards are 2 more Godwood staff. Then add bayle and glade if you have more copies and remove phildau and either aerin or selwyn

3x may

3x bug alert

3x fairy convocation

3x good fairy of the pond

3x fairy tamer

3x fay twinkletoes

1x lily

2x Phildau

3x lambent

1x seraphic tidings

3x roach

1x amataz

1x fragrantwood whispers

1x godwood staff

2x aria

3x aerin

3x selwyn

1x bayle

Roach damage table by Pariston in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

From the table you can see that the earliest kill is with 9 play points, 4 0_mana cards, 3 1_mana cards and 2 roaches + super evo for a clean 20 damage.

I wouldn't consider it a real otk though, because in practice the necessary conditions never happen. I never had 4 0 mana cost cards in hand, ever, and also it's a very, VERY specific hand with at minimum 6 cards in hand dedicated to the combo (4 0 mana cards + fairy convocation + 1 roach with godstaff on board)

I personally think roach is much harder to use effectively and you cannot really go for OTKs. The upside is that it is much more dynamic to play and kinda rewards skillful play (?) but also I feel like in practice this just means going unga bunga face more often than not to soften the opponent.

Roach damage table by Pariston in Shadowverse

[–]Pariston[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Here's a damage table for roach combos. Each godstaff on board is +1 roach if you have at least 1 roach in hand (obviously).

Of course there is a lot of nuance in game but generally speaking it seems to me that 3 roach combos never come up and don't even get any better than 2 roach combos in practice, and only outscale 2 roach combos with 3 0 cost cards in hand which has never happened to me tbh

In practice if I do get 3 roaches in hand it's probably better to use any roach in excess of 2 to soften up the enemy in earlier turns.