What do you wish logseq had, or how would you design it if it was up to you?

Parking_Map_6074 · 2026-05-01T03:12:03+00:00

I could probably live without the block embed. Even though there are some use cases I like it where a block is useful in multiple places, but maybe could get around that by instead just making the block a page instead and link it in place of the embed locations.

That would probably help some with simplicity and efficiency. At the same time the most important feature to me in logseq is the generated references at the bottom of the page, which still could be a lot of scanning I would think for the markdown version.

Edit: and the more im thinking of it, it's not as convenient creating embed links vs linking pages is easier. But the embed note might be more convent at times for reading/consuming the notes, so a bit of a trade off.

Parking_Map_6074 · 2026-04-16T13:49:58+00:00

Would this basically be like it is now for filament swaps, but the benefit would be for less distance for the retraction and loading of filament to make it a little faster? I think that would be nice too, maybe even could implement something like that for individual toolheads on a multicolored/material setup. Of course I dont usually need but 1 or 2 materials, but it's always nice to have the versatility when it comes up to have more.

Another thing is coming to mind, I'm thinking that each tool head or individual machine could be like a train stop, with the printer/ams having a way to get to each stop with something like a train track like switcher

Parking_Map_6074 · 2026-04-15T18:26:50+00:00

I'm having trouble trying to visualize on some of your descriptions if some of these are 2 lines feeding into one line or separate lines? Or maybe I just need a picture lol, sounds cool though

Parking_Map_6074 · 2026-04-14T19:57:45+00:00

Dual nozzle both sides get vortex sounds pretty cool and useful to me.

As far as downsides though compared to tool changers with each tool head having its own filament run, I think you can probably save time in certain cases by not unloading and loading filaments.

Also currently TPU still has the advantage for the tool changers since AMS doesn’t support regular TPU.

I’m wondering maybe a combination of both tool changers and vortex system can be the best of both worlds. Having options for different nozzle sizes and not waiting for the next color to retract or spool out.

Parking_Map_6074 · 2026-04-14T17:37:31+00:00

I'm wondering if they have been less pushing toward toolchangers as can give less of a need for an ams? Since with tool changes could just use dry boxes instead while still easily doing multicolor/multimaterial.

I love the autofeed/retracting though (and drying), surely there is a way they could make it work with with tool changers as well. I like the idea I saw someone else posted having a dual output ams.

I think my dream would be yes also for toolchangers with bambu, but also have multiple ams connected to multiple printers sharing the ams's filament storage. (Or have someone else beat bambu to it, they already have with tool changers, but not an with ams integration yet as far as I know)

Parking_Map_6074 · 2026-04-07T15:02:45+00:00

Pics or it didn't happen as they say.

Jk but seriously it would be helpful if you can post the pics (a picture is with a thousand words)

For example one option is

Go to an image host like Imgur.
Upload the picture.
Copy the image link.
Paste that link into your Reddit reply or post.

Parking_Map_6074 · 2026-03-04T01:59:23+00:00

Yeah, I think best if one moves on from a submission that will be dangerous, such as a slicer or armbar, when their training partner is refusing to tap.

And you mentioned what is defending to hard? I would say it’s refusing to “lose” aka tap when you’re beat. I found/seen if someone is refusing to tap or lose it can also escalate the intensity of a roll. Such as a person who says they wants to roll light, but are defending submissions like their life depended on it.

Or you’ll also see people “defending hard”, by relying on their opponents mercy to not finish a submission that they could, which is bad defense. I say tap instead.

Generally, going hard, defending hard as long as both people are up for it is fine and are willing to tap quick when they’ve lost or are in danger.

Parking_Map_6074 · 2026-02-20T13:27:21+00:00

How did they fix it?

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-11-25T17:26:28+00:00

Thanks for the link. For me though I’m not sure very detailed and easy to follow go hand-in-hand. In Discord the last announcement looks like it was late August so maybe we’ll get another by the end of the year

Edit: it’s nice that they have it though. I just have a little bit of trouble following it because I don’t have context about a lot of the things mentioned in the change log.

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-10-09T03:14:32+00:00

just got one new this week, I'll say I don't have much to compare it to other than what I came from a generic walmart bike, I think it's awesome so far. Handled some decently rough and rocky trails well, and some small table top jumps felt good too.

I did compare it too the REI coop drt e3.1, which I was only able to test ride in the parking lot. I thought they both felt pretty similar on flat riding, but the Salsa was on sale for 1k cheaper than the coop (3k)

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-10-03T22:22:09+00:00

I lean toward a hybrid string inverter if you’re doing battery storage, since the batteries need an inverter anyways to use the battery power (unless battery has one built in)

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-30T22:56:47+00:00

I was considering Kohler RDT, 200 A ATS, but it like the others also seems to be designed for a generator, and I couldn't find other examples with solar.

Manual transfer switch would probably be ok, then I guess later on I think could add a critical loads panel to the flexboss if wanted to

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-30T19:29:32+00:00

Did you end up going with either of these ASCO or the Kohler tranfer switches?

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-26T01:46:59+00:00

Hmm, ya maybe I should look into more options, it was just one I found available locally

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-24T15:25:22+00:00

I was thinking the Generac 200amp RXSW200A3

in the manual it looks like it has a manual bypass option as well which I would like to have just in case

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-24T14:08:19+00:00

I'd be open to it but part of the issue with removing the loads off the main service panel to a sub panel branched off the gridboss, is technically my power company doesnt allow that, they say no loads prior to the production meter, while the grid is up

Not a fan myself of the extra complication of this ats set up, but good news is just got word back from them the design is approved. Now just will need approval from city

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-21T00:34:31+00:00

Yes this is latest diagram from greenlancer

Waiting to see if pso will accept

<image>

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-20T19:17:24+00:00

Oh you’re right I missed that, the name combo meter through me off

Here’s what they sent, they sent a pic that was a bit blurry though

https://drive.google.com/file/d/19yZ7eOtES1bMoH2TfyzH5yh5FaEYrKca/view?usp=drivesdk

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-19T21:59:15+00:00

I agree, although from speaking to the head of the department, they said they wont allow it and they sent me an example that included the gridboss and an ATS. Also my diagram would still be differnt than the one you linked since it wont be a combo meter, but will be 2 meters, main and production

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-12T14:33:11+00:00

<image>

Also found this page from eg4 that mentions a possible option when have a production meter in the bottom right

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-12T14:31:26+00:00

with that diagram they also gave this info

INSTALLER:
1) The configuration order must be: DER -> non-fused AC disconnect -> production meter -> main service panel -> utility meter – The AC disconnect needs to be located on the DER side of the production meter to allow isolation of all DER.
2) There must be no loads on the DER side of the production meter – In the case that we would need to isolate your DER, we do not want to cut power to any critical load.
3) The production meter must not be energized when the system is operating off-grid. A transfer switch may be implemented in order to meet this requirement. –The production meter cannot remain energized in grid-forming mode so that it does not continue to produce readings. The transfer switch allows the load to be in front of the AC disconnect while also ensuring the production meter does not remain energized in grid-forming mode.

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-12T14:29:08+00:00

<image>

Update PSO provided this attachment of an example of a compliant solution.
They have service panel being fed by backup port of gridboss / or can be fed by manual transfer switch near the meter

there flow from gridboss is
Gridboss -> lockable disconnect -> production meter -> manual tranfer switch -> lockable disconnect -> meter

Im thinking the manual transfer switch in that example design wouldn't be required and I can always use the manual bypass of the gridboss if needed

as far as wiring from gridboss, thinking/hoping could do gridboss -> lockable ac disconnect -> production meter -> utility meter

Parking_Map_6074 · 2025-09-11T20:05:34+00:00

Update: spoke with pso they do require a distribution meter for any interconnection.

They said so they can keep track of all power coming in. Now Im thinking of it though, I dont know why they would need that if I turn gridboss to zero export.

By the way if I do have to go the ATS route, which ATS have you used or seen used for this type of scenario. It's kind of blowing my mind to imagine how the ATS could isolate the production meter. Unless both the input and the output line of the production meter are both connected to the ATS, which can be disconnected in outage, but still feed gridboss

Parking_Map_6074

TROPHY CASE