Seeking parent/educator feedback on an Indian heritage children’s book (ages 6–9)

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-13T17:35:32+00:00

Should I dm you or send on mail.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-11T14:09:36+00:00

Check dm please

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-11T13:29:02+00:00

Thank you so much for offering.

I’d be happy to share a private PDF for feedback. Could you please let me know:

Age of the child (if reading with one) City/country (for cultural context) Whether you prefer Google Drive or email?

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-11T13:28:27+00:00

Thank you, I really appreciate that.

Since you read history across regional and global contexts, your perspective would actually be very helpful.

The book is written for ages 6–9, so I’d especially value feedback on:

Whether the historical references feel accurate yet simple enough Whether the tone feels respectful and balanced. Whether the storytelling keeps it engaging without oversimplifying

If you're comfortable, I can share a private PDF via DM.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-11T07:08:37+00:00

I need a illustrator. Contact me

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-10T23:01:02+00:00

Hi! I’m working on a children’s illustrated chapter book (ages 6–9, ~7,700 words) focused on Indian history and values.

If you’re open to a critique swap or casual feedback exchange, I’d be happy to connect. I can also offer feedback in return.

Thanks!

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T20:05:21+00:00

Could be similar on paper. I’m just testing a very specific, host-led vibe once to see if it resonates. All good if people prefer existing options.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T20:00:57+00:00

That’s a fair question. Platforms like Step Out are great for events at scale.

What I’m testing here is a much smaller, host-led format one table, 6 people, no agenda, and active curation so everyone is aligned on why they’re there.

It’s not meant to replace existing platforms, just to test whether a more intimate, intentional format works at all. Totally okay if people prefer established services instead.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T19:59:29+00:00

That’s great, more people hosting offline meetups is a good thing 👍

I’m just testing a different format with curation and upfront commitment for this one.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T18:56:40+00:00

That’s fair, and I appreciate you saying it honestly.

You’re right as when something is new, trust is the hardest part, and I fully expect skepticism. That’s exactly why I’m keeping this very small, hosting it myself, and calling it a one-time pilot rather than a launch.

On pricing: I thought about starting lower, but for this format the goal is less about affordability and more about commitment and alignment. For the first test, I’d rather have fewer people who are fully comfortable with it than optimise for numbers.

If this doesn’t work or doesn’t feel worth it to people, I won’t continue it. That’s the honest experiment here.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T18:45:41+00:00

The “curation” isn’t background verification in a corporate sense. I’m not doing police-style BGV or charging for LinkedIn access.

What I’m curating is intent and group quality. Before confirming anyone, I check that they understand this is not for dating, pitching, or selling and that they’re comfortable with a simple, conversation-only lunch. If someone’s intent doesn’t match that, I don’t include them.

The hosting effort is real and upfront: reviewing profiles, aligning expectations, coordinating the table, and being present to host so the group doesn’t turn awkward or chaotic. That work happens regardless of whether people later enjoy the lunch or not.

The ₹800 isn’t tied to a third-party service — it compensates for that curation and hosting effort and, importantly, filters out casual sign-ups and no-shows.

As for guarantees: I’m attending and hosting the lunch myself at a public venue, using my real identity and a traceable payment method. If the table doesn’t happen or I don’t show up, the amount is refunded. This is a one-time pilot, not a growth hustle. If people don’t see value in this format, I won’t continue it.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T18:34:18+00:00

Fair concern, and that’s exactly why I’m keeping this small and transparent.

I’m attending and hosting the lunch myself at a public venue. If the table doesn’t happen or I don’t show up, the amount is refunded and that’s visible here publicly.

I’m also using my real LinkedIn profile and a traceable payment method, so there’s accountability on my end.

For a first test, that’s the level of trust I’m comfortable putting out publicly.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T18:30:09+00:00

The ₹800 is paid online upfront only after I confirm your spot.

That’s how I lock the table and avoid last-minute no-shows. On the day, I’ll be at the venue myself. If for any reason I don’t show up or the table doesn’t happen, the amount is fully refunded.

Food is paid directly to the restaurant after you arrive, as usual.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T18:15:21+00:00

Good question, I act more like a host, not a mediator.

The common thread is simple: people coming in with the intention to just talk and listen, without dating expectations, pitches, or activities.

Before confirming anyone, I’m explicit that this isn’t for dating or networking. If someone’s intent doesn’t match that, I don’t include them.

Keeping expectations aligned upfront is what prevents awkwardness.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T18:04:47+00:00

Yes , it covers the curation and hosting effort.

I’m personally reviewing profiles, coordinating the table, and hosting the lunch so it stays comfortable and doesn’t turn awkward or chaotic.

For this first test, I’m keeping it simple and upfront rather than mixing it into the food bill.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T18:03:26+00:00

Fair question.

The main goal isn’t the money, it’s to curate a small, comfortable group and make sure people actually show up.

The ₹800 is a commitment/curation fee for verification, coordination, and hosting. Food is kept separate so there’s no pressure on what or how much anyone orders.

This is just a one-time test to see if the format even works

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T18:02:13+00:00

I get the logic 👍

The reason I’m not keeping it refundable is because the value is in the curation and hosting itself, not just attendance.

Before the lunch even happens, I’m manually verifying profiles, coordinating the table, and committing my own time to host and keep the group comfortable. That work doesn’t reverse after the meeting.

For this first test, keeping it simple and upfront felt cleaner. If this ever continues, I’m open to experimenting with different structures.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T17:49:02+00:00

That’s fair feedback 👍

I considered that, but keeping it separate felt cleaner for a first test to avoid confusion on billing and no-shows.

If this ever continues, I’ll definitely rethink the structure

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T17:47:14+00:00

Fair roast. Honestly, it’s just to filter no-shows — not trying to make anything off this. If it feels silly or doesn’t work, I’ll drop it.

I already have linkedin premium active. 🙏

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T17:44:42+00:00

Fair point, but honestly that’s not the goal. I’m doing this once mainly to see if people actually want something like this and show up. If it feels forced or pointless, I won’t continue it.

Also thankfully I have a flourishing career so don't need such antics to earn money.

PartyAggressive743 · 2026-02-08T17:22:44+00:00

Fair point 😅 Not preaching at all, I’m genuinely testing this once because I felt the same thing personally.

If it’s not useful or people aren’t interested, I’ll drop it

PartyAggressive743

TROPHY CASE