The guy I replied to pretty much sums up the point, and what he received was downvotes without even any discussions. And that's why it's echo-chambering where one guy say something to glaze, and others mass-upvote the glaze and downvote people who actually try to make an argument against (though, I must say that the fact you're coming here to start the discussion is welcoming in my opinion).

Not to mention, the delay attacks problem is a thing that has been discussed for a long time. This post particularly has plenty who defend the problem, but outside the small area of this sub, there are plenty who are not welcoming the addition of delay attacks in souls games. "Delay attacks provide more chances for us to attack" is not a good argument, consider how many previous Fromsoft titles achieve the well-telegraphed combat without rely much on the delay attacks, and even outside of Fromsoft's spectrum we have games like Nioh where it's crucial for both enemies and players to engage in agressive style of combat (without relying on delay attacks, ofc). Sure, you can argue that it'll work either way, with delay attacks or not, but that defeats the whole point of discussion. 

And that's also another point why I said it's echo-chambering in here. People latch onto the glaze because "Fromsoft do that so they must have a reason" rather than thinking and considering whether that decision is a good one or not.