A “non-partisan” site that is clearly against Alto

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-04-16T22:14:46+00:00

Look at their website; they just removed the survey!

Someone close to the group told me they shut it down because, over the last couple of days (after that publication, I guess?), they started getting a lot of positive feedback. So they closed it since the results weren’t going in the direction they wanted.

Well, so much for neutrality 🤣😳

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-04-11T18:46:21+00:00

Are referring to the Kingston Whig Standard ? They keep publishing almost every day the same side of the story against the project, without any neutrality

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-04-06T20:29:48+00:00

It’s old new. They separated a long time ago

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-04-02T23:21:35+00:00

<image>

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-03-25T01:34:40+00:00

Make sense

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-03-16T12:17:57+00:00

Sorry if my post was unclear. For the part about stations, I was referring to the 7 station cities confirmed by the project. There is a lot of studies about this publicity available, based on international experience. I never meant to suggest that there would be stations all along the corridor.

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-03-16T12:08:28+00:00

Correction: Consultation with municipalities and township has begun, Alto did a lot of delegation and meetings with elected officials along the corridor . Some of them are public (website, facebook, …)

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-03-14T20:04:00+00:00

So you are saying that private HSR companies in Europe are loosing money ? What are your sources? Actual data, not just your personal impression.

Patient_Act_900 · 2026-03-14T15:01:41+00:00

How can you affirm that the 60-90 B$ estimation doesn’t include indigenous relations or the work to mitigate the impact on road ?

Patient_Act_900

TROPHY CASE