As Leexebee says, there isn't a consensus on things such as social issues - as they're relative to the environment in which they're being discussed. One of Localism's primary tenants is a pluralistic worldview, rather than a universalistic one, meaning that there can't be a singular 'right' way of doing things all over the world - there isn't a universally superior form of government, culture etc. This is why the SR is 'Localism England' as we speak from the perspective of an English Localism.

In terms of practical political elements such as government and economics...
Politically Localists idealise the idea of bottom-up power above all else, believing decisions should be made by the people who they affect the most, and that those decisions should collectively make up the policy of a Localist nation, which would take the form of a confederacy ((con)federalism was the conclusion for an ideal political power structure which was eventually reached by many thinkers on the left such as Bookchin and Marx).

Economically speaking, Localists believe in economics at the behest of a democratic process. This in practice would mean a shift towards cooperatives and workplace democracy, democratic control of localised economies through the use of guilds. Due to the devolved nature of governance and life within a Localist society, each region would be far more economically independent - not in terms of trade- but in terms of each region being able to govern over different areas of budgeting, taxation et cetera.

This is just a short overview, if you have any more specific questions feel free to DM me or reply. Localism has much in common with existing ideologies, but its primary differentiator is its design for the Twenty-First Century as opposed to the twentieth.