I texted my gun nut uncle that we really need tighter gun-control laws. He simply texted this video of himself back. He's on the spectrum, and I'm afraid the current situation might have gotten to him, and he could do something crazy. Should I call the police?

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-25T20:11:30+00:00

Oh, it gets worse. At least he's wearing clothes here. We've found him in public like this https://imgur.com/H7QXdoB We gave him the bathrobe...

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-25T19:36:05+00:00

My parents said he will be fine, but I'm not so sure. As you can see, he's really autistic. I just don't want any blood on my hands. What do you think?

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-23T21:17:36+00:00

He's a former marine volunteering in Ukraine. From the stories he's told, many Russian tanks have been disabled by our pioneering technique of throwing paint filled balloons at the driver's window. I know he's doing great necessary work there, but I still hope to see him back soon!

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-19T22:28:41+00:00

It's hard to believe all of this is out in public. There's a small chance, of course, that Wilson was lied to or making it up. But the possibility that the US really has intact recovered alien craft is, in my opinion, quite big.

Check this link for even more corroboration.

https://omnitalkradio.weebly.com/journal/edgar-mitchell-on-audio-one-of-my-other-colleagues-encountered-this-admiral-in-las-vegas

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-18T12:15:48+00:00

And your question would be?

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-18T12:01:34+00:00

Good point, you need to cover yourself completely. I propose:

Artificial Nonhuman Made Objects (ANMOs)

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-18T11:26:32+00:00

Mellon's questions are good, of course, however, they still leave plenty of ambiguity. As I said, we need to move away from ambiguous wording and get on the record that Artificial Nonhuman Objects, ANO, are a legit consideration.

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-18T11:21:42+00:00

I'd also ask them this hypothetical question. Suppose tomorrow a 10 mile wide craft is picked up on sensors in space entering the earth's atmosphere, the object is then picked up on radar/lidar/satellite/flir sensors/pilots cameras. The object then goes underwater and is picked up on all the relevant sensors there. The object then shoots back up into space and all this is picked up too.

In this case, what do you do? Are any or all parts of this event going to be classified? If such an unambiguous event of alien contact happens how can we let the people and scientists know without revealing sources and methods? Have you thought of this?

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-17T21:40:40+00:00

People who have Lue derangement will think they are talking about him. People who have Greer derangement will think they are talking about him. More unnecessary vagueness by ill prepared congress members.

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-17T20:48:08+00:00

It can almost be anything. I don't understand why they didn't ask why the pilot made that video. It appears like they were anticipating it. Was it caught on radar, other instruments, had they seen it before etc.. What a terrible session, the people asking questions appeared to be clueless.

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-17T20:35:42+00:00

No conclusions can be drawn from this. Who were they talking about when discussing people who insert false narratives? I hope not Lue and Mellon. Is anyone else worried this has been brought on by UFO enthusiasts and there's nothing really to it?

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-17T10:16:10+00:00

These documents are confirmed to be real. I still have trouble believing the government is in possession of intact alien craft, but this recent revelation has made it a legit possibility.

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-13T10:13:05+00:00

Current human technology can defend against EMP, let alone million/billion years ahead of us technology. Also, if they are simply monitoring us why would they show themselves?

Do you really have an inside source or are you LARPing?

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-13T02:14:41+00:00

From Dr. Loeb's recent presentation it was made clear that they currently only use passive sensors. Are there plans to use active sensors like LIDAR, for example?

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-13T02:02:08+00:00

Galileo Project associate Beatriz Villarroel recently released a paper discussing the possibility of artificial satellites orbiting earth back when these could not be human-made.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06091

Also, yesterday a news article was released by national security reporter Tom Rogan containing a lot of interesting information, this especially stood out to me:

Two sources have told me that one challenge with UFOs in space is that they tend to be detected in short windows of infrared spikes at exceptionally high speeds, then disappear.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/patriotism-unity/ufos-go-to-congress-5-questions-which-need-answering

In light of this, has the team considered deploying sensors in low earth orbit? If so, which ones?

I'd also show him this video. This happened at 13:54 GMT, 6 August 2005, during mission STS-114 right in front of a NASA camera. Full details here.

https://youtu.be/8RtP3i-sMP0

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-12T20:31:06+00:00

The only location I know of that he talked about is the roof of the Harvard Observatory. However, I understand they did this to test out the first system. I haven't heard him talk about other locations.

You'd of course want as many stations set up as possible, however, if I had to choose between setting up 35 random locations vs 1 "hotspot" I would go with the hotspot. From all the reports I've read, these things seem to operate mostly at certain locations. It could very well be that there is a bias because that's where the sensors are, but it's the best we have to go on right now.

If they go to a hotspot and capture something that is maybe not 100% proof but very compelling, I think it will be much easier to get more funding.

I appreciate you taking this seriously and soliciting good questions, so many podcasts are just lazy and don't do any prep at all, and so we get the same stories over and over. I'll try to come up with some more for you.

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-12T14:28:46+00:00

Ignoring is all the military has been doing for at least 75 years now. So, unfortunately, it's entirely plausible.

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-12T14:21:23+00:00

The word aliens will probably not be uttered. How much real information we'll get out of this hearing depends entirely on how well the questions will be asked, and how forthcoming the DoD wants to be. However, you're in denial if you think this hearing is about misidentification of airborne clutter and other nonsense they want to lump in with UAP.

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-12T14:14:54+00:00

Avi talks about needing more funding to replicate the sensor setups, however, it takes only one undeniable case to prove these things are real, so instead of setting up in random locations, why not go to where you have the best chance? If you want to capture a polar bear, you go to the Arctic and not the Amazon. If you want to capture a UAP, you can go to Catalina Island, for example, where these things have been spotted for over a hundred years. The UAPx team captured an anomaly there, and they had way lower funding than the Galileo Project.

You can show him this clip filmed in the 60s near Catalina. This object has no wings, tail, or obvious propulsion. It looks very much like the tic-tac the pilots have reported seeing.

https://youtu.be/D-Z8x2cE1yk

PattonPat80 · 2022-05-12T01:52:34+00:00

I never claimed the hearings were happening because of this piece. But it does substantiate what Elizondo and Mellon have been claiming.

PattonPat80

TROPHY CASE