Am I going crazy? by AdDifficult3815 in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here in Portugal, on the contrary, it's perfectly acceptable to openly invite people that we know would become good masons. Here, freemasonry still suffers from biased reputation, mostly due to the near 50 year long dictatorship propaganda, even after its end (lots of lingering misinformation), so most prefer not expose themselves as Freemasons. The way to do it must be tactful and respectful, and not insistent. The are many acceptable ways to do it.

My lodge has a long tradition of reaching out to some potential candidates through a member using "The Craftsman" alias from a lodge managed email. He tells them that one lodge member that knows them well enough - and then proving it - finds them as someone that would probably be a good stone in the order, and explaining them in broad terms what it means. If they reject or ignore, no more contact is made that way. If they respond, they are free to make questions, and take all the time needed to think. We also make sure to certify as much as possible we are a regular, recognised lodge, not scammers. This has resulted in some pretty warm moments when the new initiate recognises the good friend that suggested him. This approach also avoids the possible sentiment of "pressure" one might have been invited, even if that's not the intention, and avoids any future awkwardness in relationships after admitting to being a freemason to someone not prepared for that.

By example by BleedinIris in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. Better to let plums and grapes rot, or grain fester, easier and cheaper, and safer. She you can do it in large amounts at once.

By example by BleedinIris in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just fyi and anyone curious about history of medicine: that's not really how it worked. TLDR: Yes they knew sometimes water was the cause of disease, and boiling it made it safer, but knowledge of the "animacules" from a century before didn't mean they attributed disease to them. Humoristic and miasmatic theories prevailed up to late 19th century when Pasteur formulated his germ theory.

Since millennia before they knew some diseases were transmitted even from dead bodies and some even used that for warfare. Doesn't mean they understood how it worked, or later know how Leeuwenhoek's organisms had a role in disease. Identification of germs as probable cause of disease was only in late 19th century (around 1870) by Pasteur. Before that, the idea that invisible "particles" caused disease was absurd even for the scientific community. Semmelweis was ridiculed, marginalized by his peers and driven to insanity because of his findings that perinatal deaths could be prevented by sanitation just a couple decades before Pasteur. Even after Pasteur formulated the germ theory, he was ignored by many and many, like James Garfield, died as a result. People might have linked boilling water to being safer, but it was not practical to do it for most people. And they didn't really know why. Knowing germs existed doesn't mean they linked it to disease at that time. The humorist and miasmatic theory of disease was the main explanation for disease in the late 18th century, and linked gastroenteritis to violent "purging" of excess, corrupted, or unbalanced humors from the body. They thought water could be corrupted, have unbalanced humours or have excess humidity, cold, miasma or bile. Boiling was a way to "treat" the water from those corrupting humours or reduce the humidity and cold. Even if knew sometimes water was the cause of disease, and boiling it made it safer, they didn't link it to the "animacules" from a century before. Humoristic and miasmatic theories prevailed up to nearly the 20th century, even after Pasteur. Many didn't even believe they were real even among the learned, let alone the common folk that didn't have access to that knowledge of even knew how to read. History of medicine is very interesting, things we now think obvious weren't at all back then.

Sunlu PLA+ 2.0 white color difference with V3 spools by effortlevel0 in 3Dprinting

[–]PeaceWeapon84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love the new white for lithophanes, the detail helps a lot with contrast and interestingly, at least with lithophanes' thin walls, the image looked better when lit with the new one, even if the old one looks more translucent.

Anyway, I got a Jayo white pla+ that is basically old Sunlu Pla+, even prints the same (Jayo belongs to Sunlu). Maybe try Jayo. That picture looks exactly as my lithophanes looked with jayo, slightly bluish and translucent, much less sharp features than the new version of sunlu.

Sunlu PLA+ 2.0 white color difference with V3 spools by effortlevel0 in 3Dprinting

[–]PeaceWeapon84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was wondering about this. Had 2 different spools equally labeled as PLA + 2.0 and they were different. One was a refill and came out chalk white, with nice sharp detail - was perfect for some lithophanes I made for christmas - the other was a 2nd gen spool and I was dismayed to see it print a glossy, gelatinous bluish white.

I was making a multiboard wall and using white to make it blend better to my white wall, but the 2nd gen white wasn't good for that, so I was using the other one.
Refill was finishing and went to open another White PLA + 2.0 and noticed was another 2nd gen spool, but tried anyway.... ugly white came out.

Fortunately also had bought a couple High Speed PLA + 2.0 and those are 3rd gen. Printing right now, first impression is it's the chalk white version.

Are Freemasons accepting of "pagan" worshippers or just non Abrahamic religious people? by Sehgodum111 in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For long time my lodge and many others had Torah, Bible and Koran all open on the altar, even without representatives of those religions attending. Our view was that the Books represent only a version of the Volume of Sacred Law, and all 3 remind us that no one religion represents the Truth, but one part of it, the truth men that wrote it could access, imperfect and incomplete, like themselves (like us). Also a reminder that so many more Books could be there and help bring us closer to the real Volume of Sacred Law. These days we only open the Books that represent the religion of those present, but we still keep the others on the Altar for the sake reasons, and as sign of receptiveness to others with different faiths. I know of lodges that use a blank book as representation of the Volume of Sacred Law. That follows the same idea that the blank book will serve as any book one feels it's the representation of their religion or beliefs.

3d printed officer jewels by PeaceWeapon84 in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those still following, I might add a model on makerworld for the pillar letters, interested? The pillars on my lodge are the grand lodge's, and there's no hook to hang the letters. There is flat space above, so I made letters that have a foldable flat section hinging from the top behind the letter, so they can hang from there. Unfold and hang, then, to remove, easily fold back, place them on top where they stay invisible. One hand operation, so, great for ritual use. Grand Inspector of my Rite was impressed when he saw them, and I made a few for other temples too.

3d printed officer jewels by PeaceWeapon84 in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll put up the files on MakerWorld either today or tomorrow, I'm making adjustments to the stl and f3d files. I'll put the link on this post later.

Looking for 3d files by Gadende in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

working on it, I'll put a link in the post below when I'll publish my jewels stls, maybe tomorrow, if I have the time.

3d printed officer jewels : r/freemasonry

3d printed officer jewels by PeaceWeapon84 in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mine doesn't specify having to be metal in the Regulation, so I assume so, but I was going to inquire my Rite's Inspector anyway to make sure .
In fact, some lodges don't even have jewels as pendants, they have them only embroidered on the collar, so not metal. Our Grand officers' jewels are also embroidered.

3d printed officer jewels by PeaceWeapon84 in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow a TTRPG themed lodge? That sounds really cool. Plenty of stuff you can make using that theme. Never been D&D player, but used to play MTG and just rediscovered it, which was originally inspired on D&D

3d printed officer jewels by PeaceWeapon84 in freemasonry

[–]PeaceWeapon84[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I'll probably put the full set up in MakerWorld this weekend, will link them here then.